Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Biden voters were much more likely to report negative voting than Trump voters in the 2020 election

by Emily Manis
May 22, 2022
in Political Psychology
(Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

(Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

In the 2020 election, many Americans chose to vote due to their hatred of the opposing candidate, rather than their fondness for their chosen politician. A study published in American Political Research seeks to understand the dynamics behind this so-called “negative voting” pattern.

Politics is regularly a field that contains a lot of negativities, but the 2020 American presidential election was particularly difficult and polarizing. Negative voting is a choice made by constituents to vote for a certain candidate, not because they want to support them, but because they do not want their opposing candidate to win.

This is in contrast with voters who vote because they have positive feelings about their own party and their candidate. Though this is not a new concept, it is very prevalent at this point in time with approximately one third of voters in the 2020 election casting a negative vote for president.

Researchers Diego Garzia and Frederico Ferreira da Silva utilized a Computer Assisted Web Interview survey conducted by Qualtrics. It included 1,064 participants to represent the American voting pool. Participants were presented with a direct measure of negative voting, where they were asked if they view their vote as an expression or support for their candidate or opposition for the competing candidate. Votes against are considered negative votes.

Results showed that approximately 30% of participants cast a negative vote. Despite the polarization the 2020 election brought, this is not significantly more than in previous elections. Interestingly, Biden voters were much more likely (39%) to report negative voting than Trump voters (18%).

This is in line with previous research that showed that the incumbent candidate was more often the target of negative voting than the challenger. Negative voting is seen less in people with strong party affiliations and can go as high as 50% among people who swing between parties or identify as independents.

This study sought to revisit the idea of negative voting in regard to the very polarizing 2020 presidential election. Despite the strengths, this study has some limitations. For example, post-electoral surveys can lead to post-election rationalization, which could skew the results. Additionally, online surveys have come under fire many times for potentially being less accurate and being completed less carefully.

The study, “The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election“, was authored by Diego Garzia and Frederico Ferreira da Silva.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors
Artificial Intelligence

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

July 15, 2025

Can an AI understand a political metaphor? Researchers pitted ChatGPT against the speeches of Donald Trump to find out. The model showed moderate success in detection but ultimately struggled with context, highlighting the current limits of automated language analysis.

Read moreDetails
New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election
Anxiety

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

July 13, 2025

Among young adults, stress from election news was linked to higher risks of depression and anxiety, while pre-election anticipatory stress was linked to depression only. Stress about the election outcome was not associated with either condition.

Read moreDetails
Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is
Political Psychology

Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is

July 12, 2025

New research finds that students with different political identities tend to engage in slightly different everyday behaviors. But students dramatically overestimate how much liberals and conservatives differ, fueling a distorted sense of social and political division.

Read moreDetails
Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds
Political Psychology

Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds

July 10, 2025

What if the key to swaying a swing voter lies in their biology? New research found giving testosterone to weakly affiliated Democratic men made them less loyal to their party and more open to Republicans, revealing a potential hormonal link to political persuasion.

Read moreDetails
People with psychopathic traits fail to learn from painful outcomes
Narcissism

National narcissism linked to emotional impairments and dehumanization, new study finds

July 7, 2025

A new study suggests that people who see their nation as uniquely important often struggle with recognizing emotions and experience more anger and contempt—factors that may help explain why they’re more likely to dehumanize both outsiders and fellow citizens.

Read moreDetails
Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails
New study suggests Donald Trump’s “fake news” attacks are backfiring
Political Psychology

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

July 5, 2025

Why has politics become so personal? The answers may lie in our minds. These 13 studies from the new science of political behavior reveal the hidden psychological forces—from personality to primal fear—that are driving us further apart.

Read moreDetails
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Political Psychology

Despite political tensions, belief in an impending U.S. civil war remains low

July 4, 2025

A new national survey finds that only a small fraction of Americans believe civil war is likely or necessary.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Dopamine’s stronghold is the striatum, not the cortex, brain imaging study suggests

Brain injuries linked to criminal behavior highlight importance of white matter tract damage

Early exposure to violence linked to later firearm use

What friendships can tell us about life satisfaction among singles

Parent’s anxiety sensitivity linked to teen’s brain patterns during emotional challenges

Key Alzheimer’s protein found at astonishingly high levels in healthy newborns

People’s ideal leader isn’t hyper-masculine — new study shows preference for androgynous traits

Chronic pain rewires how the brain processes punishment, new research suggests

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy