Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

When do children learn to write? Earlier than you might think

by The Conversation
February 20, 2016
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Steven Yeh

Photo credit: Steven Yeh

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

We typically think of writing as something that is out of reach for preschool children. After all, young children can’t write recognizable letters, and they can’t spell words.

We have been studying young children’s knowledge about writing in our research. And we are finding that they know more about writing – even before they learn to read – than one might think.

Writing is smaller than drawing

Consider this production by a two-and-a-half-year-old American child, Sophia:

Sophia identified the large circular portion on the right as a drawing of a circle. She said that the portion with small squiggles on the bottom and near the left was writing. Sophia’s writing did not use recognizable letters, nor was she spelling any specific word.

However, she seemed to know that writing is generally smaller than drawing and that writing is arranged along a line.

Research has supported what the example from Sophia suggests – that children as young as two or three years of age already know about some of the basic differences in appearance between writing and pictures. They try to reproduce these differences in their own attempts to write and draw.

Consider a study in which Chinese children were asked to write several words, such as “sun,” and also to draw pictures of those same things. Two- and three-year-old children’s attempts to write characters were far off the mark, bearing little resemblance to the correct characters.

However, children’s writings tended to be smaller than their drawings. The writings were also less curvy and more angular, angularity being a property of characters in Chinese.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Not only did children make different sorts of marks when writing than when drawing, they also chose different implements to do so. Specifically, children would often choose dark pens or pencils to write and colored crayons to draw.

In another part of this study, adults were shown the productions that the children had made. They were told that some of them were produced in response to a request to write and that others were produced in response to a request to draw. The adults were not told which was which, and their job was to guess.

The adults found the task to be difficult, which is not surprising. However, they performed better than would be expected by random guessing even with the productions of two- and three-year-old children.

Clearly, children were doing something different when writing than when drawing – different enough that adults could even detect some of the differences.

Drawings can have different labels, words remain same

Young children may know that writing generally looks different from writing, but the next question is: do they have any understanding that it functions differently?

One important property of writing is that it represents a specific word in a specific language. The written word “rabbit,” for example, stands for the spoken word “rabbit.” It would not be appropriate to read this word as “bunny.”

In contrast, we can look at a picture of a rabbit and say that it is a rabbit or a bunny or an animal – any one of these labels, or others, would be considered correct.

In a recent study, we examined children’s knowledge of this important difference between writing and drawing. The children in the study ranged from three to five years old, and they were not able to read words themselves. A researcher would show a child a written word such as the word rabbit and would read it to the child.

Later, when a puppet employed in the experiment read the word as “bunny,” many children picked up the mistake. In a similar task with drawings, children were more likely to say that the puppet was correct in using the alternative label.

The different results in the writing and drawing tasks suggest that young children have some understanding that a written word stands for one specific unit of language in a way that a drawing does not.

They are beginning to understand that, while a written word should be read the same way each time, it is sometimes appropriate to use different labels for a drawing. Importantly, children begin to acquire this understanding even before they can sound out words themselves.

Encouraging children to write

Parents and teachers sometimes dismiss children’s early productions as scribbles – signs of a lack of knowledge about how to write and how to draw.

Reading activities are common in preschools, and parents appreciate the importance of reading to their young children. The value of writing is less widely appreciated. Reading activities are more common than writing activities in preschools. And parents too tend to give more importance to reading. Preschool writing activities may be limited to having children write their names.

The research we have reviewed, together with other findings, shows that children begin to learn about some of the visible distinctions between writing and drawing from an early age. Our research shows that from a surprisingly young age, children have some knowledge about what writing looks like and how it functions. That is, young children know more about writing than we might think. There is more to their scribbles than meets the eye.

Preschool teachers and parents can build on the knowledge that children have. If we know what to look for, we can acknowledge what children already know, for example by saying, “You did a good job of writing on a line here.” This can help children advance to the next step.

The Conversation

By Rebecca Treiman, Burke and Elizabeth High Baker Professor of Child Developmental Psychology, Washington University in St Louis and Lori Markson, Associate Professor of Psychology, Washington University in St Louis

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Previous Post

Motion-controlled video games may improve real world skills

Next Post

What’s love got to do with it? Drinking, smoking and teen romance

RELATED

How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

New psychology research reveals that wisdom acts as a moral compass for creative thinking

March 6, 2026
Hemp-derived cannabigerol shows promise in reducing anxiety — and maybe even improving memory
Alcohol

Using cannabis to cut back on alcohol? Your working memory might dictate if it works

March 5, 2026
Chocolate lovers’ brains: How familiarity influences reward processing
Cognitive Science

A single dose of cocoa flavanols improves cognitive performance during aerobic exercise

March 4, 2026
Heart and brain illustration with electrocardiogram waves, representing cardiovascular health and neurological connection, suitable for psychology and medical research articles.
Cognitive Science

Fascinating new research reveals your heart rate drops when your brain misperceives the world

March 4, 2026
Colorful digital illustration of a human brain with neon wireframe lines, representing neuroscience, psychology, and brain research. Ideal for psychology news, brain health, and cognitive sciences articles.
Cognitive Science

New research on acquired aphantasia pinpoints specific brain network responsible for visual imagination

March 3, 2026
Traumatic brain injury may steer Alzheimer’s pathology down a different path
Cognitive Science

Growing up with solid cooking fuels linked to long-term brain health risks

March 1, 2026
The disturbing impact of exposure to 8 minutes of TikTok videos revealed in new study
Cognitive Science

Problematic TikTok use correlates with social anxiety and daily cognitive errors

March 1, 2026
Why most people fail to spot AI-generated faces, while super-recognizers have a subtle advantage
Artificial Intelligence

Why most people fail to spot AI-generated faces, while super-recognizers have a subtle advantage

February 28, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New research sheds light on the psychological recipe for a grudge

Eating ultra-processed foods is not linked to faster mental decline, study finds

Hypocrisy and intolerance drive religious doubt among college students

A single dose of DMT reverses depression-like symptoms in mice by repairing brain circuitry

Apocalyptic views are surprisingly common among Americans and predict responses to existential hazards

A psychological need for certainty is associated with radical right voting

Blocking a common brain gas reverses autism-like traits in mice

New psychology research sheds light on why empathetic people end up with toxic partners

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc