PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Cross-cultural study finds wide gap in what men and women want in a romantic partner

by Eric W. Dolan
July 12, 2015
in Social Psychology
Photo credit: Pedro Midena

Photo credit: Pedro Midena

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A study examining 37 different cultures has found that heterosexual men and women have significantly different preferences regarding their sexual partners. The finding bolsters the theories of evolutionary psychologists, who believe the difference is the result of evolutionary pressures.

Daniel Conroy-Beam of the University of Texas at Austin and his colleagues found they could predict a person’s sex with 92 percent accuracy if they knew his or her preferences regarding their sexual partners.

“Our new appraisal of sex differences in terms of the overall pattern of mate preferences shows that this important domain of life is dramatically different for the sexes — much more than researchers have thus far appreciated,” they wrote in their study, which was published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

The study consisted of 4,764 men and 5,389 women across 33 countries and 37 cultures. The participants were asked to rate the desirability of 18 traits. Four of the traits were predicted to be sex differentiated according to evolutionary hypotheses: good financial prospects, good looks, chastity, ambition and industriousness. The remaining traits were predicted to not be sex differentiated: good cook and housekeeper, pleasing disposition, sociability, similar educational background, refinement/neatness, dependable character, emotional stability, desire for home and children, favorable social status, similar religious background, similar political background, mutual attraction—love, good health, and education/intelligence. The participants were also asked the ideal age difference between themselves and their partner.

Evolutionary psychology predicts that men and women will tend to have consistently different mating strategies because of a simple fact: Women get pregnant and men do not. This fundamental asymmetry means men and women face different challenges in regards to reproductive fitness, the number of offspring produced by an individual.

Gestation and breastfeeding requires women to invest time and resources in her children, shortening her reproductive lifespan. “Consequently, in long-term mating, women more severely faced the adaptive problem of acquiring resources to produce and support offspring. Women are therefore predicted to greater prefer long-term, committed mates who possess resources and qualities linked to resource acquisition such as status, ambition, and slightly older age,” the researchers wrote.

Conroy-Beam and his colleagues conducted the research to account for a shortcoming in previous evolutionary psychology studies. Previous research had investigated the differences between men and women by isolating a single variable for study. However, the researchers noted, humans evaluate potential partners based on a host of traits — not just one. Mate selection is a complex multidimensional task.

“For example, men, more than women, prefer their partners to be physically attractive, but they must also be kind, educated, and share their political values; women, more than men, desire partners with good financial prospects, but they must also be ambitious, emotionally stable, and share their religious views. Importantly, mates do not come a la carte but prix fixe: Each potential mate has a set of features that must be accepted or rejected wholesale.”

To account for this complexity, the researchers used a multi-dimensional statistic called Mahalanobis distance in their study. They found only a 22 percent overlap in the sexual preferences of men and women.

“A large body of research demonstrates that mate preferences are universally sex differentiated along individual dimensions, but our multivariate analyses show that these individual dimensions contribute to a much larger (and underappreciated) sexual dimorphism in the overall pattern of preferences. This pattern-wise sex difference is large, cross-culturally robust, and driven primarily by those dimensions predicted to be sex differentiated by prior evolutionary hypotheses,” Conroy-Beam and his colleagues concluded.

ShareTweetSendScanShareSharePinSend

Get all the latest updates on new psychology research with the free PsyPost app.
 


NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

STAY CONNECTED

TRENDING

Children who play more video games show greater gains in intelligence over time, study finds

Young children are more irritable when their mother has emotion regulation difficulties

Psychopathic women who desire marriage are more likely to experience insults from their partner

New study suggests that psychopathic individuals tend to become even worse after age 50

Brain imaging study suggests that drinking coffee enhances neurocognitive function

New psychology research uncovers a “hidden source” of regret

RECENT

Study sheds light on the neurocognitive processes linked to perceiving social injustice during arrests of Black civilians

Children who play more video games show greater gains in intelligence over time, study finds

Study finds contrapposto poses in male models influence perceptions of attractiveness and masculinity

Young children are more irritable when their mother has emotion regulation difficulties

Women who dress provocatively are judged negatively by other women due to perceptions of promiscuity

  • Cognitive Science
  • COVID-19
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Drug Research
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Meditation
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Aviation Psychology and Human Factors
  • Relationships and Sexual Health
Powered by

About

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

No Result
View All Result
  • About
    • Newsletter signup form
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Contact us
  • My account
  • Privacy policy
  • Psychology news
  • PsyPost app privacy policy
  • Shop
  • SmartMag Home

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.