Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Staring contests are automatic: People lock eyes to establish dominance

by Association for Psychological Science
February 25, 2011
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

EyeImagine that you’re in a bar and you accidentally knock over your neighbor’s beer. He turns around and stares at you, looking for confrontation. Do you buy him a new drink, or do you try to outstare him to make him back off? New research published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, suggests that the dominance behavior exhibited by staring someone down can be reflexive.

Our primate relatives certainly get into dominance battles; they mostly resolve the dominance hierarchy not through fighting, but through staring contests. And humans are like that, too. David Terburg, Nicole Hooiveld, Henk Aarts, J. Leon Kenemans, and Jack van Honk of the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands wanted to examine something that’s been assumed in a lot of research: that staring for dominance is automatic for humans.

For the study, participants watched a computer screen while a series of colored ovals appeared. Below each oval were blue, green, and red dots; they were supposed to look away from the oval to the dot with the same color. What they didn’t know was that for a split-second before the colored oval appeared, a face of the same color appeared, with either an angry, happy, or neutral expression. So the researchers were testing how long it took for people to look away from faces with different emotions. Participants also completed a questionnaire that reflected how dominant they were in social situations.

People who were more motivated to be dominant were also slower to look away from angry faces, while people who were motivated to seek rewards gazed at the happy faces longer. In other words, the assumptions were correct—for people who are dominant, engaging in gaze contests is a reflex.

“When people are dominant, they are dominant in a snap of a second,” says Terburg. “From an evolutionary point of view, it’s understandable—if you have a dominance motive, you can’t have the reflex to look away from angry people; then you have already lost the gaze contest.”

Your best bet in the bar, though, might just be to buy your neighbor a new beer.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
Previous Post

Analysis shows which people most likely found incompetent to stand trial

Next Post

For alcoholics, new help in abstaining, without thinking about it

RELATED

New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators
Authoritarianism

Right-wing authoritarianism is linked to belief in the paranormal, independent of cognitive style

February 26, 2026
New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators
Artificial Intelligence

New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators

February 26, 2026
Depression might unlock a more independent mind at the ballot box
Political Psychology

People who believe they contribute to society are more likely to vote and engage in politics

February 25, 2026
The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures
Donald Trump

Donald Trump gained 2024 votes in areas where inflation was worse, study finds

February 25, 2026
Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology
Narcissism

Narcissists are persuasive speakers but terrible writers, study finds

February 25, 2026
Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology
Relationships and Sexual Health

Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology

February 25, 2026
How parent-child political disagreements harm relationships and individual mental health
Political Psychology

How parent-child political disagreements harm relationships and individual mental health

February 24, 2026
What scientists found when they analyzed 187 of Donald Trump’s shrugs
Donald Trump

Donald Trump’s 2024 election win increased the social acceptability of prejudice, study suggests

February 24, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Probiotics and prebiotics restore appetite control in mice raised on unhealthy diets

Incarcerated men with sexual sadism show distinct anatomical brain traits

Right-wing authoritarianism is linked to belief in the paranormal, independent of cognitive style

AI therapy is rated higher for empathy until people learn a machine wrote the text

Many neurological conditions are more frequent among individuals with severe mental illness

Psilocybin produces different behavioral and brain-altering effects depending on the dose

New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators

Blaming a partner for shared pornography use buffers relationship dissatisfaction in women

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc