Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Women Less Likely to Report “Love at First Sight” Than Men

by Eric W. Dolan
March 5, 2010
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

Women are less likely than men to report having experienced love at first sight, although they tend to report having the same number of loves.

This finding comes from a study published in Evolutionary Psychology in 2010 that investigated sex differences in “falling in love.” The authors of this study distributed online questionnaires to 357 participants that assessed whether the participant was the first to fall in love in their current romantic relationship, the number of people they have been in love with, number of episodes of “love at first sight,” and other variables related to their experiences with falling in love.

The study was conducted by Andrew Galperin and Martie Haselton of the University of California.

The authors of this study did not find any sex differences in how likely the participant was to fall in love with their partner first. (The majority of those surveyed reporting that they and their partner fell in love at the same time.) Nor were there any significant differences found between men and women concerning the total number of times they reported being in love.

There was a difference between men and women concerning “love at first sight.” As Galperin and Haselton explain,

“The sex difference we found in the lifetime number of episodes of “love at first sight” (with men reporting more) is arguably an indicator that men are more susceptible than women to falling in love early on. However, as noted above, this effect became only a non-significant trend when controlling for sex drive, suggesting that some men might be reporting some episodes of sheer sexual desire as “love at first sight.”

Men also reported falling in love with a partner that did not love them back more than women. According to the authors,

“We found that relative to women, a lower percentage of men’s loves was reciprocated. This supports the idea that for men, falling in love might function as a signal of commitment that sometimes persuades women to enter a relationship and sometimes does not.”

Reference:

Galperin, A. & Haselton, M. (2010). Predictors of how often and when people fall in love. Evolutionary Psychology, Vol 8, No 1: 5-28. Full text: http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep080528.pdf

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Racism and Discrimination

Hispanic adolescents experience later sleep timing and greater social jet lag than peers, study finds

July 3, 2025

Hispanic adolescents reported later sleep timing, greater social jet lag, shorter weekday sleep, higher caffeine intake, and more evening screen time than peers. Screen use and stress, but not caffeine, were linked to delayed sleep and sleep misalignment.

Read moreDetails
Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Infidelity

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

July 3, 2025

The online shaming of unfaithful celebrities is a modern spectacle, but why do some join in while others don't? Researchers exploring this puzzle found a key predictor: a belief in a just world, which unexpectedly dampens outrage and blame.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Social Psychology

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

June 30, 2025

Individuals with higher mortality risk—as judged by actuarial life insurance data—tend to care less about long-term consequences. They show more impulsivity and less future planning, consistent with evolutionary theories that link time horizon to environmental and internal health cues.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Hispanic adolescents experience later sleep timing and greater social jet lag than peers, study finds

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

Genetic factors may influence how well exercise buffers against childhood trauma

Tips for parents in talking with your kids about your partner’s mental illness

Subjective cognitive struggles strongly linked to social recovery in depression

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy