Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

New Stanford research sheds light on how children’s brains memorize facts

by Stanford University Medical Center
August 17, 2014
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Life Science Databases (Creative Commons)

Photo credit: Life Science Databases (Creative Commons)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

As children learn basic arithmetic, they gradually switch from solving problems by counting on their fingers to pulling facts from memory. The shift comes more easily for some kids than for others, but no one knows why.

Now, new brain-imaging research gives the first evidence drawn from a longitudinal study to explain how the brain reorganizes itself as children learn math facts. A precisely orchestrated group of brain changes, many involving the memory center known as the hippocampus, are essential to the transformation, according to a study from the Stanford University School of Medicine.

The results, which will be published online Aug. 17 in Nature Neuroscience, explain brain reorganization during normal development of cognitive skills and will serve as a point of comparison for future studies of what goes awry in the brains of children with learning disabilities.

“We wanted to understand how children acquire new knowledge, and determine why some children learn to retrieve facts from memory better than others,” said Vinod Menon, PhD, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and the senior author of the study. “This work provides insight into the dynamic changes that occur over the course of cognitive development in each child.”

The study also adds to prior research into the differences between how children’s and adults’ brains solve math problems. Children use certain brain regions, including the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex, very differently from adults when the two groups are solving the same types of math problems, the study showed.

“It was surprising to us that the hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to memory-based problem-solving during childhood don’t look anything like what we would have expected for the adult brain,” said postdoctoral scholar Shaozheng Qin, PhD, who is the paper’s lead author.

Charting the Shifting Strategy

In the study, 28 children solved simple math problems while receiving two functional magnetic resonance imaging brain scans; the scans were done about 1.2 years apart. The researchers also scanned 20 adolescents and 20 adults at a single time point. At the start of the study, the children were ages 7-9. The adolescents were 14-17 and the adults were 19-22. The participants had normal IQs. Because the study examined normal math learning, potential participants with math-related learning disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were excluded. The children and adolescents were studying math in school; the researchers did not provide any math instruction.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

During the study, as the children aged from an average of 8.2 to 9.4 years, they became faster and more accurate at solving math problems, and relied more on retrieving math facts from memory and less on counting. As these shifts in strategy took place, the researchers saw several changes in the children’s brains. The hippocampus, a region with many roles in shaping new memories, was activated more in children’s brains after one year. Regions involved in counting, including parts of the prefrontal and parietal cortex, were activated less.

The scientists also saw changes in the degree to which the hippocampus was connected to other parts of children’s brains, with several parts of the prefrontal, anterior temporal cortex and parietal cortex more strongly connected to the hippocampus after one year. Crucially, the stronger these connections, the greater was each individual child’s ability to retrieve math facts from memory, a finding that suggests a starting point for future studies of math-learning disabilities.

Although children were using their hippocampus more after a year, adolescents and adults made minimal use of their hippocampus while solving math problems. Instead, they pulled math facts from well-developed information stores in the neocortex.

Memory Scaffold

“What this means is that the hippocampus is providing a scaffold for learning and consolidating facts into long-term memory in children,” Menon said. Children’s brains are building a schema for mathematical knowledge. The hippocampus helps support other parts of the brain as adultlike neural connections for solving math problems are being constructed. “In adults this scaffold is not needed because memory for math facts has most likely been consolidated into the neocortex,” he said. Interestingly, the research also showed that, although the adult hippocampus is not as strongly engaged as in children, it seems to keep a backup copy of the math information that adults usually draw from the neocortex.

The researchers compared the level of variation in patterns of brain activity as children, adolescents and adults correctly solved math problems. The brain’s activity patterns were more stable in adolescents and adults than in children, suggesting that as the brain gets better at solving math problems its activity becomes more consistent.

The next step, Menon said, is to compare the new findings about normal math learning to what happens in children with math-learning disabilities.

“In children with math-learning disabilities, we know that the ability to retrieve facts fluently is a basic problem, and remains a bottleneck for them in high school and college,” he said. “Is it that the hippocampus can’t provide a reliable scaffold to build good representations of math facts in other parts of the brain during the early stages of learning, and so the child continues to use inefficient strategies to solve math problems? We want to test this.”

Previous Post

Synapse dysfunction and psychiatric disorders: Suspect gene corrupts neural connections

Next Post

Do gut bacteria rule our minds? Microbes evolved to sway food choices

RELATED

Study reveals lasting impact of compassion training on moral expansiveness
Meditation

A daily mindfulness habit can improve your memory for future plans

April 15, 2026
New study confirms: Thinking hard feels unpleasant
Cognitive Science

Why thinking hard feels bad: the emotional root of deliberation

April 14, 2026
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

Your breathing pattern is as unique as a fingerprint

April 12, 2026
Vivid close-up of a brown human eye showing intricate iris patterns and details.
Cognitive Science

How different negative emotions change the size of your pupils

April 11, 2026
The surprising way the brain’s dopamine-rich reward center adapts as a romance matures
Cognitive Science

Longitudinal study links associative learning gains to later improvements in fluid intelligence

April 10, 2026
Scientists observe “striking” link between social AI chatbots and psychological distress
Cognitive Science

Why some neuroscientists now believe we have up to 33 senses

April 9, 2026
Casual sex is linked to lower self-esteem and weaker moral orientations in women but not men
Cognitive Science

Fake medicine yields surprisingly real results for older adults’ memory and stress

April 9, 2026
Sorting Hat research: What does your Hogwarts house say about your psychological makeup?
Cognitive Science

Teenage brains process mechanical and academic skills differently across the sexes

April 8, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Why personalized ads sometimes backfire: A research review explains when tailoring messages works and when it doesn’t
  • The common advice to avoid high customer expectations may not be backed by evidence
  • Personality-matched persuasion works better, but mismatched messages can backfire
  • When happy customers and happy employees don’t add up: How investor signals have shifted in the social media age
  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds

LATEST

Can psychedelics help trauma survivors reconnect intimately?

Cannabinoid use is linked to both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, massive review finds

New psychology study links relationship insecurity to the pursuit of wealth and status

Republican lawmakers lead the trend of using insults to chase media attention instead of policy wins

Scientists wired up volunteers’ genitals and had them watch animals hump to test a long-held theory

New study sheds light on the mechanisms behind declining relationship satisfaction among new parents

A daily mindfulness habit can improve your memory for future plans

Sexualized dating profiles can sabotage long-term relationship prospects, study finds

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc