PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

New research suggests that conservatives and liberals show differences in executive functioning

by Beth Ellwood
May 25, 2020
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research has uncovered a link between political ideology and differences in working memory function. The findings were published in Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Emerging psychology research has begun to explore differences in the cognitive functioning of liberals versus conservatives. In a recent series of studies, researchers Buechner and colleagues propose that the two groups differ in terms of cognitive flexibility and that this contributes to differences in working memory functioning.

Buechner and team suggest that conservatives should be better at response inhibition, a task that involves the suppression of thoughts that are in conflict with existing information. They explain, “the traits that reinforce cognitive rigidity in conservatives (e.g., rule adherence, resistance to change) should promote response inhibition by facilitating persistence through suppression of conflicting stimuli.”

Liberals, on the other hand, should be superior at response updating, a task that requires the revision of mental representations in accordance with new information. The authors say, “the traits that reinforce cognitive flexibility in liberals (e.g., openness, adaptability) should promote response updating by facilitating adaptation through suppression of outdated information.”

Three separate studies were conducted to explore differences in response updating and inhibition among liberals and conservatives.

The first study involved 105 US undergraduate students who completed an inhibition of return task. Subjects focused on a target cue while ignoring a distractor that randomly presented on the screen. In the same study, a second sample of 96 US undergraduate students completed an updating task called the “keeping-track-task” which required them to continually update their mental representation of a target cue. All participants completed assessments of political ideology and the results were analyzed using linear regression. Consistent with the researchers’ hypothesis, conservatives performed better on the inhibition task and liberals performed better on the updating task.

Next, researchers conducted a second study to assess whether these performance differences might be due to differences in intelligence and religiosity. The authors express, “This possibility is important as liberals are more open to experience (Carney et al., 2008) and openness is linked to elevated intelligence (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997). Relatedly, conservatives tend to be more religious (Feldman & Johnston, 2014), and religiosity is positively correlated with impulse regulation (McCullough & Willoughby, 2009).”

A total of 194 American and Canadian adults were randomly assigned to either an inhibition or updating task. This time, intelligence and religiosity were assessed in addition to political ideology. Results showed that, just as in Study 1, the conservatives showed superior response inhibiting, while the liberals showed better response updating. Statistical analysis showed that neither religiosity nor intelligence accounted for the relationship between ideology and task scores.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

A final study looked at whether cognitive flexibility might instead explain the working memory differences that were found. A total of 207 American and Canadian adults were again randomly assigned to complete either an inhibition or an updating task. Subjects then completed a 12-item assessment of cognitive flexibility/rigidity which included the items “I can communicate an idea in many different ways” and “I avoid new and unusual situations.”

Unsurprisingly, conservatives displayed greater accuracy on the inhibition task, while liberals showed more accuracy on the updating task. As predicted, liberals showed more cognitive flexibility than conservatives. Furthermore, this mental flexibility predicted performance differences on the tasks and explained the association between political ideology and task performance.

The authors express that their findings provide evidence that political ideology is associated with differences in executive functioning, independent of factors typically important to task performance, such as intelligence and religiosity. They say, “these findings offer a unique perspective to consider the cognitive differences that delineate conservatism and liberalism and the impact of cognitive flexibility on executive functioning.”

The study, “Political Ideology and Executive Functioning: The Effect of Conservatism and Liberalism on Cognitive Flexibility and Working Memory Performance”, was authored by Bryan M. Buechner, Joshua J. Clarkson, Ashley S. Otto, Edward R. Hirt, and M. Cony Ho.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin6ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • A computational model explains the sudden rise in societal division
  • Harsh parenting predicts teenage depression and aggression through different types of repetitive thinking
  • The surprising reason our memories become blurred as we age, according to new neuroscience research
  • Heavy ChatGPT use linked to intellectual laziness and social isolation
  • Poor emotional regulation in anxious kids is linked to greater family accommodation

Science of Money

  • Why the same risk carries different prices in different financial markets
  • The geopolitics of gold: How sanction risks are reshaping global reserves
  • How workers are actually using generative AI on the job
  • How extraordinary experiences and personality traits shape emotional brand attachment
  • What Chinese beauty influencers reveal about the limits of the Silicon Valley playbook

Recent

  • Comedy is funnier when it is easier to process, new psychology study finds
  • People with unfulfilled romantic needs form stronger attachments to fictional characters
  • Scientists build a more accurate Alzheimer’s risk score using global DNA data
  • Personality impairments link childhood maltreatment to adult anxiety
  • First human trial of psilocin since the 1960s reveals better tolerability than psilocybin
  • Watching violent online pornography is linked to poorer sexual health
  • Scientists map the brain pathway that links social isolation to increased alcohol consumption
  • Brain damage reveals how a specific region generates mind-wandering
  • Over half the risk for postpartum psychosis is tied to genetics, large study finds
  • Study reveals a double standard in how we view AI-assisted communication

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc