Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Scientists identify a psychological phenomenon that could be reinforcing political echo chambers

by Eric W. Dolan
January 16, 2021
in Political Psychology

[Subscribe to PsyPost on YouTube to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in psychology and neuroscience]

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

People are less willing to share information that contradicts their pre-existing political beliefs and attitudes, even if they believe the information to be true, according to new research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science. The phenomenon, which researchers have dubbed selective communication, could help explain the widening gulf between liberals’ and conservatives’ perceptions of reality in the United States.

“For a long time, I’ve been interested in how our political opinions and our partisan attachments bias how we deal with information. We’ve known for a while that people are very selective in what they read, listen to, and ultimately believe. And that’s a problem if we want political behavior to have some grounding in objective reality,” said study author Pierce Ekstrom, assistant professor at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln.

“Selective communication was so interesting to me because if people are biased in what they talk about with others, they could perceive reality very clearly and still present distorted or inaccurate versions of reality to the people around them. People counting on their friends and family for information will only get the facts they are willing to provide.”

In four studies, which included 2,293 individuals, participants were presented with a few positive and negative effects either of increasing the minimum wage or of banning assault weapons. After reading a positive or negative effect of the policy, the participants indicated whether they believed the finding and how likely they would be to mention the finding to someone close to them.

As expected, liberal participants were more likely to believe in the positive effects of the minimum wage and banning assault weapons, while conservative participants were more likely to believe in the negative effects of the minimum wage and banning assault weapons.

“When ideology, partisanship, or a strong political opinion is at stake, it is difficult to persuade people to believe unappealing political facts. Which we call ideology-inconsistent, identity-inconsistent, or attitude-inconsistent information. Bear in mind this first point is not remotely new to our study,” Ekstrom told PsyPost.

But the researchers found that participants were also consistently more willing to pass on findings that supported their political ideology. This selective communication of information occurred regardless of whether participants believed the findings were accurate.

In other words, liberal participants expressed a greater willingness to communicate the positive effects of the minimum wage and banning assault weapons, while conservative participants expressed a greater willingness to communicate the negative effects of those policies.

“Even if and when you succeed in persuading someone that something is true, they may be relatively unwilling to pass that information along if it undermines their ideological, partisan, or other political commitments,” Ekstrom explained.

This biased sharing of information also appeared to be impacted by political ideology in another way.

“Liberals were most biased in communication with ideological opponents, revealing greater willingness to discuss ideology-inconsistent information with fellow liberals than with conservatives. Conservatives, in contrast, were most biased in communication with ideological allies—and showed no significant evidence of bias in what they were willing to communicate to liberals,” the researchers said.

All research includes some limitations, and the current study is no exception.

“There are at least two” important caveats, Ekstrom said. “First, we asked people how likely they would be to mention the information we showed them. Their answers to this hypothetical question may under- or overestimate how selectively they communicate in actual conversations.

“Second, we focused on people’s willingness to share a specific type of information: good and bad effects of increasing the minimum wage and banning assault weapons. People may show different biases in how they talk about other issues. They may also show different biases in how they about information that is less black-and-white (like what they’d read in an op-ed, for example).”

The study, “The Selective Communication of Political Information“, was authored by Pierce D. Ekstrom and Calvin K. Lai.

(Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay)

ShareTweetSendScanShareSharePin4Send
Previous Post

Dark personality traits are linked to sexist attitudes among adolescents

Next Post

Longitudinal data suggests physically aggressive men tend to have more sex partners

STAY CONNECTED

Find these awesome psychology shirts and more at the PsyPost Store!

TRENDING

Social anxiety tends to be elevated among those who suffered emotional maltreatment in childhood

Scientists use deep learning algorithms to predict political ideology based on facial characteristics

New study identifies perceived mattering as a core psychological component of happy marriages

New study hints at the characteristics of the “ideal” female breast

Higher prenatal testosterone exposure is linked to Machiavellianism and psychopathy, study suggests

Diversity of the gut microbiota is associated with the severity of depression

RECENT

Diversity of the gut microbiota is associated with the severity of depression

Higher prenatal testosterone exposure is linked to Machiavellianism and psychopathy, study suggests

New research: Brain implant can objectively measure chronic pain severity

New study hints at the characteristics of the “ideal” female breast

Our brain prefers positive vocal sounds that come from our left

Study highlights the importance of napping for memory consolidation in early childhood

People with advanced biological age are at greater risk of developing depression and anxiety, study finds

Sun avoidance and lack of vitamin D dietary intake linked to heightened anxiety among college women

Currently Playing

Childhood adversity associated with increased emotional response to others’ suffering in adulthood

Childhood adversity associated with increased emotional response to others’ suffering in adulthood

Childhood adversity associated with increased emotional response to others’ suffering in adulthood

Mental Health
New study sheds light on cognitive mechanisms linked to hypnosis

Chronic intake of refined carbohydrates between meals is associated with decreased cognitive performance, study finds

Cognitive Science
Mindfulness might hinder prosocial behavior among individuals with high intelligence

Mindfulness might hinder prosocial behavior among individuals with high intelligence

Social Psychology
Women who have larger breasts tend to have lower levels of satisfaction with their breasts, study finds

Women who have larger breasts tend to have lower levels of satisfaction with their breasts, study finds

Social Psychology
Unwanted celibacy is linked to hostility towards women, sexual objectification of women, and endorsing rape myths

Depressive symptoms tied to malevolent creativity in new study

Depression
Psychosocial stress triggers an oxytocin response in women, study finds

Oxytocin alters amygdala activation in response to angry faces in antisocial personality disorder

Cognitive Science
  • Cognitive Science
  • COVID-19
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Drug Research
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Meditation
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Aviation Psychology and Human Factors
  • Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychedelic Drugs
  • Dark Triad
  • Political Psychology

About

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.