Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

New study suggests that people share fake news on Twitter to hurt their political enemies

by Eric W. Dolan
April 21, 2021
in Political Psychology
(Image by Thomas Ulrich from Pixabay)

(Image by Thomas Ulrich from Pixabay)

[Subscribe to PsyPost on YouTube to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in psychology and neuroscience]

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New research accepted for publication in the American Political Science Review sheds light on the psychological factors related to sharing fake news on Twitter.

The findings indicate that people who share fake news don’t suffer from a lack of political knowledge or media literacy. Instead, the new study suggests that partisan animosity plays a key role.

“The spread of fabricated political news on social media has emerged as a major concern. We wanted to understand how big the problem is and to test competing theories of why some people fall for political fake news while others do not,” said study author Mathias Osmundsen, an assistant professor at Aarhus University.

The researchers analyzed data provided by 2,337 Twitter users, who completed an online survey between December 2018 to January 2019. The survey included assessments of a number of factors, including political knowledge, digital media literacy, cognitive reflection, and “trolling” behavior. The participants also indicated their own political leanings and how they felt about Republicans and Democrats in general.

Osmundsen and his colleagues then cross-referenced 2,709,052 tweets collected from the participants to a list of fake news and real news sources. They found that about 3% of the tweets contained links to either fake news or real news sources. But the vast majority of news linked pointed to legitimate news websites. Only about 4% of the news links — 3,269 tweets in total — pointed to fake news sources.

The researchers also examined the partisan slant of the news sources. Pro-Republican fake news was shared more often than pro-Democrat fake news. In contrast, pro-Democrat real news was shared more often than pro-Republican real news.

When it came to predictors of sharing fake news, the researchers found no significant link to cognitive reflection, political knowledge, or digital media literacy. Instead, negative feelings towards one’s political opponents was the strongest predictor of sharing fake news on Twitter. Partisan animosity was also associated with sharing real news.

“Our results suggest that while the sharing of fake news on social media is relatively rare, it is dictated by the same political motivations that drive the sharing of true news: Partisans, both Democrats and Republicans, are highly motivated to share news articles that put their political opponents in an unflattering light,” Osmundsen explained to PsyPost.

“Still, we find that Republicans end up sharing more fake news than Democrats do. Why? We propose this ‘partisan asymmetry’ arises because most mainstream media outlets publish negative news articles about the Republican Party that Democrats will find politically useful. Republicans, however, must turn to fake news publishers to find articles that satisfy their political tastes.”

“Importantly, this does not necessarily imply that mainstream media outlets suffer from a liberal bias,” Osmundsen noted. “It may also reflect a ‘reality bias’ during an unusual time in American politics (e.g., a polarizing Trump presidency).”

But the study — like all research — includes some limitations.

“Our study was conducted in America among a sample of Twitter users. Future work should explore if our results generalize to other social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, YouTube) and other countries characterized by less intense political polarization and different media systems. We also only examine correlational data, meaning that we are reluctant to make strong causal claims about the effect of political motivations on fake news sharing.”

The study, “Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter“, was authored by Mathias Osmundsen, Alexander Bor, Peter Bjerregaard Vahlstrup, Anja Bechmann, and Michael Bang Petersen.

ShareTweetSendScanShareSharePin3Send

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

STAY CONNECTED

TRENDING

One in four people may experience estrangement from a sibling in adulthood, study finds

New study shows how mindfulness can benefit our romantic relationships

The fascinating neuroscience behind dreaming

Cognitive control serves to override the moral default in both honesty and dishonesty

Women are more attracted to men with tougher facial features when facing uncertainty, study finds

New psychology research reveals men’s motives for sending unsolicited dick pics

RECENT

Parents with more difficult childhoods are more likely to spank their children, study finds

Study suggests partisan resentment is bad for your health

The fascinating neuroscience behind dreaming

New study shows how mindfulness can benefit our romantic relationships

New study sheds light on how scarcity is experienced across different sociodemographic groups

One in four people may experience estrangement from a sibling in adulthood, study finds

Cognitive control serves to override the moral default in both honesty and dishonesty

The passage of anti-transgender legislation increases internet searches for “suicide” and “depression”

Currently Playing

Individuals with dark personality traits are less oriented towards long-term mating strategies

Disclosing victim status reduces online dating matches regardless of race or sex

Individuals with dark personality traits are less oriented towards long-term mating strategies

Dark Triad
Longitudinal study examines the effects of adversity on wise reasoning

New study examines the psychological mechanisms underlying Solomon’s paradox

Social Psychology
Engaging in religious practice, even if you don’t believe, may increase your capacity to delay gratification

Engaging in religious practice, even if you don’t believe, may increase your capacity to delay gratification

Cognitive Science
New study sheds light on how three distinct types of first impressions predict subsequent dating outcomes

New study sheds light on how three distinct types of first impressions predict subsequent dating outcomes

Relationships and Sexual Health
A single, moderate dose of psilocybin reduces depressive symptoms for at least two weeks, controlled study finds

A single, moderate dose of psilocybin reduces depressive symptoms for at least two weeks, controlled study finds

Depression
Study identifies factors that influence the link between men’s body esteem and their ability to enjoy their sexuality

Study identifies factors that influence the link between men’s body esteem and their ability to enjoy their sexuality

Mental Health
  • Cognitive Science
  • COVID-19
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Drug Research
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Meditation
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Aviation Psychology and Human Factors
  • Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychedelic Drugs
  • Dark Triad
  • Political Psychology

About

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • About PsyPost
    • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.