PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Study suggests magicians unconsciously blink their eyes to manipulate the audience during difficult tricks

by Beth Ellwood
September 1, 2022
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A new study sheds light on an unconscious tactic that magicians may be using to deceive their audiences. The experiment, published in the journal Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, found that magicians increase their eye blinking when performing difficult tricks. The researchers suggest that this tactic may be used to encourage synchronized blinking in the audience, so spectators are more likely to miss deceptive actions.

Magicians are known to manipulate the consciousness of their audiences. In 2016, a study by Wiseman and Nakano found that spectators demonstrate synchronized blinking while watching magic tricks, particularly during moments when secret actions are being carried out by the magician. This suggests that magicians may be misdirecting the audience by encouraging them to blink — and thus, to relax their attention — during moments of deception.

While this manipulation tactic seems impressive, there is some worry that a magician’s blinking behavior could lead to their own demise. Study author Anthony S. Barnhart and his coauthors note that magicians often rehearse their tricks in front of a mirror, and anecdotal evidence suggests they have a habit of blinking while practicing acts of deception.

“Before I was a scientist, I was a professional magician,” explained Barnhart, an associate professor and the Chair of Psychological Science at Carthage College. “My experiences as a magical performer showed me just how fallible human perception and memory can be, so as a psychologist I frequently turn to magicians as a source of insights about the mind that have yet to be tested. When learning magic, I was warned about the tendency for magicians to blink their eyes while carrying out sleight of hand in a rehearsal setting before a mirror, thereby blinding themselves to any evidence of their proficiency (or lack thereof) with the deceptive action.

“I decided to seek out empirical evidence of this behavior after perusing the literature on self-deception and realizing that evidence to support the existence of deep self-deception (where a person both knows the truth and actively pushes that truth out of their consciousness) was scant. If I found evidence for this blinking behavior in magicians, it would have been some of the first strong evidence of deep self-deception in the literature.”

To explore this possibility, the researchers recruited a sample of 11 magicians who had been practicing magic for anywhere between six months and 50 years. The magicians watched a tutorial for a magic coin trick involving 10 sleights of hand — a term for skillful hand movements used to deceive spectators. A week later, the magicians were filmed as they performed the magic trick four times — twice in a rehearsal setting in front of a mirror and twice in a performance setting in front of a video camera.

The researchers analyzed the footage of each performance and identified frames during which magicians were practicing sleights of hand (experimental frames) or not engaging in sleights of hand (control frames). They then coded these frames, noting whether participants’ eyes were open or closed. Finally, they performed an analysis to see whether participants’ eye blinking differed as a function of condition (rehearsal vs. performance) and frame type (experimental vs. control).

The findings revealed that the magicians increased their blinking in moments where they were practicing acts of deception (i.e., within experimental frames). However, contrary to the researchers’ hypothesis, this was only true in the performance condition, when the magicians were performing the trick for a video audience. Further evidence revealed that the magicians blinked more frequently when performing the most difficult acts of deception — suggesting that their blink rates increased with cognitive effort.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Barnhart and his colleagues say their findings suggest that the magicians’ blinking during acts of deception did not function to deceive performers about their own proficiency. They suggest instead that it served to encourage the audience to blink as well, helping the magicians conceal their secret actions.

“While my magician participants were more likely to blink their eyes when carrying out deceptive action than when not, this tendency was increased in a performance setting without a mirror compared to a rehearsal setting with a mirror,” Barnhart explained to PsyPost. “This was surprising and didn’t match the predictions from the world of magic. Our pattern of results points to a potentially interesting phenomenon: We suggest that magicians may be blinking their eyes when they carry out sleight of hand to encourage their audiences to do the same, thereby blinding the audience to any evidence of the magician’s shenanigans.”

Notably, eye blinking tends to occur during moments when visual information is scarce. If a magician increases their blink rate, this could signal to the audience that there is nothing important to see. “Although blinking during performance could act as a ‘tell’ for the audience, it could also offer a nudge to the audience that they have reached a moment when there is very little useful information in the visual stream,” the authors explained.

An important limitation of the study was that the researchers were only able to recruit a small sample of magicians due to the demanding nature of the experiment. Nevertheless, a large amount of data was collected from each participant, with researchers analyzing an average of 9,339 video frames per magician.

“Our interpretation of this surprising pattern of results is post hoc,” Barnhart noted. “Our actual experiment is agnostic to the source of this pattern. However, the pattern does conform to findings from the blink entrainment literature, which shows that media viewers are apt to entrain their blinks to those of a speaker if they are processing narrative content. Future research should explore whether a magician’s blinking behaviors impact the blinking behaviors of their audience and thereby their audience’s perceptions of the magic.”

“This work is being published in a special section of Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice edited by the leadership of the Science of Magic Association, an organization that promotes rigorous research directed toward understanding the nature, function, and underlying mechanisms of magic,” Barnhart added. “I encourage readers to follow the group’s activities at https://scienceofmagicassoc.org/.”

The study, “Tactical Blinking in Magicians: A Tool for Self- and Other-Deception”, was authored by Anthony S. Barnhart, Kaitlyn Richardson, and Shawn Eric.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • A computational model explains the sudden rise in societal division
  • Harsh parenting predicts teenage depression and aggression through different types of repetitive thinking
  • The surprising reason our memories become blurred as we age, according to new neuroscience research
  • Heavy ChatGPT use linked to intellectual laziness and social isolation
  • Poor emotional regulation in anxious kids is linked to greater family accommodation

Science of Money

  • Why the same risk carries different prices in different financial markets
  • The geopolitics of gold: How sanction risks are reshaping global reserves
  • How workers are actually using generative AI on the job
  • How extraordinary experiences and personality traits shape emotional brand attachment
  • What Chinese beauty influencers reveal about the limits of the Silicon Valley playbook

Recent

  • Comedy is funnier when it is easier to process, new psychology study finds
  • People with unfulfilled romantic needs form stronger attachments to fictional characters
  • Scientists build a more accurate Alzheimer’s risk score using global DNA data
  • Personality impairments link childhood maltreatment to adult anxiety
  • First human trial of psilocin since the 1960s reveals better tolerability than psilocybin
  • Watching violent online pornography is linked to poorer sexual health
  • Scientists map the brain pathway that links social isolation to increased alcohol consumption
  • Brain damage reveals how a specific region generates mind-wandering
  • Over half the risk for postpartum psychosis is tied to genetics, large study finds
  • Study reveals a double standard in how we view AI-assisted communication

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc