Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Take notes by hand for better long-term comprehension

by Association for Psychological Science
April 24, 2014
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Rubin Starset (Creative Commons licensed)

Photo credit: Rubin Starset (Creative Commons licensed)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

Dust off those Bic ballpoints and college-ruled notebooks — research shows that taking notes by hand is better than taking notes on a laptop for remembering conceptual information over the long term. The findings are published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

Walk into any university lecture hall and you’re likely to see row upon row of students sitting behind glowing laptop screens. Laptops in class have been controversial, due mostly to the many opportunities for distraction that they provide (online shopping, browsing Reddit, or playing solitaire, just to name a few). But few studies have examined how effective laptops are for the students who diligently take notes.

“Our new findings suggest that even when laptops are used as intended — and not for buying things on Amazon during class — they may still be harming academic performance,” says psychological scientist Pam Mueller of Princeton University, lead author of the study.

Mueller was prompted to investigate the question after her own experience of switching from laptop to pen and paper as a graduate teaching assistant:

“I felt like I’d gotten so much more out of the lecture that day,” says Mueller, who was working with psychology researcher Daniel Oppenheimer at the time. “Danny said that he’d had a related experience in a faculty meeting: He was taking notes on his computer, and looked up and realized that he had no idea what the person was actually talking about.”

Mueller and Oppenheimer, who is now at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, conducted a series of studies to investigate whether their intuitions about laptop and longhand note-taking were true.

In the first study, 65 college students watched one of five TED Talks covering topics that were interesting but not common knowledge. The students, who watched the talks in small groups, were either given laptops (disconnected from Internet) or notebooks, and were told to use whatever strategy they normally used to take notes.

The students then completed three distractor tasks, including a taxing working memory task. A full 30 minutes later, they had to answer factual-recall questions (e.g., “Approximately how many years ago did the Indus civilization exist?”) and conceptual-application questions (e.g., “How do Japan and Sweden differ in their approaches to equality within their societies?”) based on the lecture they had watched.

The results revealed that while the two types of note-takers performed equally well on questions that involved recalling facts, laptop note-takers performed significantly worse on the conceptual questions.

The notes from laptop users contained more words and more verbatim overlap with the lecture, compared to the notes that were written by hand. Overall, students who took more notes performed better, but so did those who had less verbatim overlap, suggesting that the benefit of having more content is canceled out by “mindless transcription.”

“It may be that longhand note takers engage in more processing than laptop note takers, thus selecting more important information to include in their notes, which enables them to study this content more efficiently,” the researchers write.

Surprisingly, the researchers saw similar results even when they explicitly instructed the students to avoid taking verbatim notes, suggesting that the urge to do so when typing is hard to overcome.

The researchers also found that longhand note takers still beat laptop note takers on recall one week later when participants were given a chance to review their notes before taking the recall test. Once again, the amount of verbatim overlap was associated with worse performance on conceptual items.

“I don’t anticipate that we’ll get a mass of people switching back to notebooks,” says Mueller, “but there are several new stylus technologies out there, and those may be the way to go to have an electronic record of one’s notes, while also having the benefit of being forced to process information as it comes in, rather than mindlessly transcribing it.”

“Ultimately, the take-home message is that people should be more aware of how they are choosing to take notes, both in terms of the medium and the strategy,” Mueller concludes.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Eye-tracking study suggests that negative comments on social media are more attention-grabbing than positive comments
Cognitive Science

Can you train your brain to unsee optical illusions? Scientists think so

May 12, 2025

A recent study found that radiologists are less susceptible to optical illusions, likely due to their intensive visual training. The research challenges long-standing beliefs that illusions are automatic and suggests perceptual skills can be shaped over time.

Read moreDetails
Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function
Cognitive Science

Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function

May 10, 2025

Consuming a Western-style diet packed with sugar and saturated fats may hurt your brain, not just your waistline. A new study shows poorer performance on spatial memory tasks among people with diets high in processed, unhealthy foods.

Read moreDetails
People with lower cognitive ability more likely to fall for pseudo-profound bullshit
Cognitive Science

People with lower cognitive ability more likely to fall for pseudo-profound bullshit

May 9, 2025

A new meta-analysis published in Applied Cognitive Psychology finds that people with lower cognitive ability are more likely to find meaning in pseudo-profound nonsense. The study identifies key psychological traits linked to susceptibility to feel-good but meaningless statements.

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain

May 7, 2025

Our brains process social similarity in two ways—by comparing people to each other and by comparing them to ourselves. A new study using brain imaging reveals that these forms of person knowledge are represented in separate areas of the brain.

Read moreDetails
Classical music may promote calmer, more stable fetal heart rhythms, study suggests
Cognitive Science

Classical music may promote calmer, more stable fetal heart rhythms, study suggests

May 6, 2025

Listening to classical music may calm the fetal heartbeat, according to new research. The study found that heart rate patterns became more orderly after music exposure.

Read moreDetails
Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men
Cognitive Science

Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men

May 6, 2025

New research shows women underestimate their spatial intelligence, even when they perform just as well as men. This gender gap in self-perception—shaped by personality traits like narcissism and modesty—could help explain why fewer women pursue STEM careers.

Read moreDetails
Scientists create a new color never before seen by human eyes
Cognitive Science

Scientists create a new color never before seen by human eyes

May 5, 2025

A groundbreaking study reveals that humans can experience an entirely new color, thanks to a system that stimulates individual cone cells in the retina. Scientists call the color “olo”—a brilliant blue-green that doesn't occur naturally in human vision.

Read moreDetails
Eye-tracking study: Women’s attention to facial masculinity tied to mating interests and self-perceived attractiveness
Cognitive Science

Negative images hijack attention and linger in memory, new study shows

May 3, 2025

A new study using a specially designed attention task finds that disturbing background images reliably disrupt focus and slow response times. These emotionally negative distractions also heighten negative feelings and are remembered more vividly, suggesting they hijack both attention and memory.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Can you train your brain to unsee optical illusions? Scientists think so

New research links antidepressant effects of escitalopram to endocannabinoid system changes

College students still follow familiar relationship paths despite dating app era, study finds

Women who misrepresent themselves on dating apps more likely to consider cosmetic surgery

A single dose of psilocybin might help reduce symptoms in treatment-resistant depression

Abnormal brain rhythms may offer new insight into Alzheimer’s disease and its link to epilepsy

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders

Genetic mutations predict Alzheimer’s onset like a ticking clock, study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy