Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Study: Women evaluate partners more negatively when estrogen is elevated — and men know it

by Eric W. Dolan
February 15, 2020
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

New research provides evidence that natural fluctuations in women’s hormones are not only associated with their own psychology, but also their partner’s perception and well-being.

The study, published in Biological Psychology, was the first to examine how the rise and fall of women’s hormones during the menstrual cycle impacts their partners’ feelings and perceptions.

“Hormones have an underappreciated effect on behavior. This is true for men and women, just as it’s true for animals of other species,” said study author Francesca Righetti, an associate professor at VU Amsterdam.

“Researchers have begun to explore how the hormonal variations that naturally and reliably occur across the ovulatory cycle – specifically, variation in the hormones estradiol and progesterone – affect how women think and feel.”

“But less work has examined how variation in hormones affect both members of a relationship. Given our interests in romantic relationships, we aimed to better understand what aspects of romantic relationships vary as a function of these hormones, and which do not.”

The researchers collected urine samples from 33 women for 15 days to measure changes in estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone levels. During these 15 days, the women and their male partner also completed nightly surveys regarding their relationship satisfaction, perceptions of their partner, and other factors.

All of the relationships had lasted for more than 4 months and none of the women were using hormonal contraception.

Righetti and her colleagues found that both women and their partners evaluated their relationships more negatively on days in which women had higher estradiol levels. As estradiol increased, women also evaluated their partner as less physically attractive.

“Women’s hormone levels change across their ovulatory cycles, and these changes are likely to affect their psychology and, perhaps, the way they feel toward their romantic partner. We found that the hormone that peaks just prior to ovulation, estradiol, was associated with more negative partner evaluation,” Righetti told PsyPost.

Women’s estradiol levels were also associated with their partners’ self-reported well-being. “Men also perceived their partner to be less satisfied when estradiol was high and, consequently, they experienced lower well-being,” Righetti said.

Despite the changes in sexual attraction, however, hormonal fluctuations were not associated with having sexual intercourse .

“We’d like to emphasize that our study investigated changes within couples. Some relationships are especially good, and some relationships are especially bad,” Righetti said.

“Changes in naturally varying hormones aren’t going to turn a bad relationship into a good one, or a good relationship into a bad one. But they might influence some subtle changes within a relationship – like adding some minor turbulence to what is a great relationship on the whole, or temporarily making things a little nicer for a relationship that is pretty rocky.”

The study — like all research — includes some limitations.

“Given the difficulties in recruiting couples under 40 not not using hormonal contraception, our sample size is rather small, and replication is needed to ensure the robustness of the findings,” Righetti explained.

It is also unclear why higher levels of estradiol were associated with reduced relationship satisfaction among women.

“Evolutionary theories have suggested that, when women are ovulating, they may be especially tuned into other men (e.g., men with good genetic qualities), and that’s why they distance themselves from their primary long-term partner. Our data weren’t totally consistent with this perspective, though, since estradiol was not associated with the degree to which women reported flirting and giving more attention to other men,” Righetti said.

“But this may be due to the fact that, given our small sample, our female participants may not have encountered many attractive men during the duration of the studies. On the contrary, it may be that evolution has shaped women to pre-emptively disengage from their partner close to ovulation to be open and attentive to identify alternative partners that may be especially good reproductive partners.”

The study, “How reproductive hormonal changes affect relationship dynamics for women and men: A 15-day diary study“, was authored by Francesca Righetti, Josh Tybur, Paul Van Lange, Lea Echelmeyer, Stefanievan Esveld, Janique Kroese, Joycevan Brecht, and Steven Gangestad.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders
Authoritarianism

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders

May 12, 2025

Do muscles make a man a better leader? That depends on your politics. A new study finds conservatives are drawn to strong men in leadership roles, while left-wing authoritarians are more likely to shy away from physical dominance.

Read moreDetails
Do you call your partner your best friend? This study says you’re in the minority
Relationships and Sexual Health

Do you call your partner your best friend? This study says you’re in the minority

May 11, 2025

A large study suggests that most people separate romantic and platonic bonds. While some do see their partner as a best friend, the emotional benefits of doing so vary by age, income, and relationship type.

Read moreDetails
New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction
Relationships and Sexual Health

New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction

May 9, 2025

Personality traits and perceived power don’t operate the same way in every relationship. A new study suggests that identity and relationship context change how these factors influence satisfaction, challenging long-held assumptions about what makes romantic partnerships work.

Read moreDetails
Narcissism may be fueling political polarization, according to new psychology research
Narcissism

Narcissism may be fueling political polarization, according to new psychology research

May 9, 2025

A new study suggests that narcissistic personality traits—especially feelings of entitlement and antagonism—are strongly linked to political polarization. The findings highlight how psychological tendencies may fuel both loyalty to political in-groups and hostility toward opposing sides.

Read moreDetails
Scientists studied Fox News — here’s what they discovered
Political Psychology

Scientists studied Fox News — here’s what they discovered

May 8, 2025

Fox News, a top-rated cable network since 1996, is known for its conservative commentary and strong influence on public opinion. Researchers have increasingly studied its role in shaping Americans’ views on politics, science, and conspiracy theories.

Read moreDetails
Children’s facial expressions reveal fear response to gender-nonconforming boys, study finds
Social Psychology

Children’s facial expressions reveal fear response to gender-nonconforming boys, study finds

May 8, 2025

A new study using facial recognition software found that children react with subtle fear when shown stories about boys who break gender norms. The findings shed light on early emotional bias against gender-nonconforming peers, especially feminine boys.

Read moreDetails
Online incel forums generate “dark emotional energy” that reinforces toxic group identity
Social Psychology

Online incel forums generate “dark emotional energy” that reinforces toxic group identity

May 8, 2025

Online incel communities maintain their cohesion through repeated exchanges of negative emotion, not positive connection. A new study introduces the idea of “dark emotional energy” to explain how despair and rage serve as bonding rituals in these toxic digital spaces.

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain

May 7, 2025

Our brains process social similarity in two ways—by comparing people to each other and by comparing them to ourselves. A new study using brain imaging reveals that these forms of person knowledge are represented in separate areas of the brain.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Psychedelics linked to religious disaffiliation—but not spiritual change—in large-scale study

Can you train your brain to unsee optical illusions? Scientists think so

New research links antidepressant effects of escitalopram to endocannabinoid system changes

College students still follow familiar relationship paths despite dating app era, study finds

Women who misrepresent themselves on dating apps more likely to consider cosmetic surgery

A single dose of psilocybin might help reduce symptoms in treatment-resistant depression

Abnormal brain rhythms may offer new insight into Alzheimer’s disease and its link to epilepsy

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy