Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

A new study has found being angry increases your vulnerability to misinformation

by Eric W. Dolan
January 7, 2021
in Cognitive Science
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

Human memory is prone to error — and new research provides evidence that anger can increase these errors. The new findings have been published in the scientific journal Experimental Psychology.

“My interest in the impact of anger on misinformation came from both real-world experience and research,” said study author Michael Greenstein, an assistant professor at Framingham State University.

“From the real-world side, there’s this phrase that people say — ‘don’t get emotional.’ That phrase is somewhat often used to describe anger and the idea that when you’re angry you’ll make poor decisions, which would also imply poor memory use.”

“From the research side, anger is an interesting emotion because it somewhat defies traditional classifications in that it’s a ‘negative’ emotion, but it impacts cognition in a lot of ways that are more similar to ‘positive’ emotions.”

In the study, 79 participants watched an 8-minute excerpt of the film Defending Your Life. The participants then completed two challenging cognitive tasks and a scripted interview. During this second portion of the study, the participants were randomly placed into one of two conditions: an anger condition or a neutral condition.

“In the neutral induction, the experimenter behaved professionally and politely. In the anger induction, the experimenter was disorganized, dismissive, insulting, lost documents, provided only vague instructions, created unnecessary work, and interrupted the participant,” the researchers explained.

The participants then completed a short quiz about the film that contained bits of misinformation. For example, the participants were asked to respond to the question “What do Daniel and Julia sit on during their conversation when Julia drops her purse?” However, Julia never dropped her purse in the film.

To further induce feelings of anger, those in the anger condition then wrote about a time in their lives when they had been made angry. Those in the neutral condition, on the other hand, wrote about a time when they visited a museum.

Finally, the participants were given an 80-item test designed to assess how much they could accurately recall about the film and how much misinformation they had absorbed.

The researchers found that anger did not impair the ability to recognize details actually present in the film. However, those in the anger condition were more susceptible to misinformation than those in the neutral condition. In other words, angry participants were more likely to misattribute details from the initial quiz to what they had seen in the film.

The researchers also found that participants in the anger condition tended to be more confident in the accuracy of their memories. But among those participants, increased confidence was associated with decreased accuracy. Among those in the neutral condition, in contrast, increased confidence was associated with increased accuracy.

The findings highlight that “memory is not like a video camera,” Greenstein told PsyPost. “That finding is decades old, but studies continually show that the average person doesn’t know it in spite of this being one of thousands of studies replicating that finding.”

In addition, “anger doesn’t simply make someone’s memory worse,” he said. “Instead, it makes people more susceptible to the types of memory errors they were already making (because memory doesn’t work like a video camera.)”

As with all research, the new study comes with some limitations.

“This is a preliminary study,” Greenstein said. “It established what anger is doing to memory, but not how. So discovering the mechanisms for how (and eventually why) anger is impacting memory will be an important next step.”

“Just because something is a memory error doesn’t mean it’s bad,” he added. “Researchers, like myself, are interested in looking at whether people remember something true to their initial instance of remembering it, so any changes to memory from that instance are considered errors. However, any time that you learn something after the fact that is closer to reality than your memory was, anger can help make your memory more accurate.”

The study, “Anger Increases Susceptibility to Misinformation“, was authored by Michael Greenstein and Nancy Franklin.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin22ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function
Cognitive Science

Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function

May 10, 2025

Consuming a Western-style diet packed with sugar and saturated fats may hurt your brain, not just your waistline. A new study shows poorer performance on spatial memory tasks among people with diets high in processed, unhealthy foods.

Read moreDetails
People with lower cognitive ability more likely to fall for pseudo-profound bullshit
Cognitive Science

People with lower cognitive ability more likely to fall for pseudo-profound bullshit

May 9, 2025

A new meta-analysis published in Applied Cognitive Psychology finds that people with lower cognitive ability are more likely to find meaning in pseudo-profound nonsense. The study identifies key psychological traits linked to susceptibility to feel-good but meaningless statements.

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain

May 7, 2025

Our brains process social similarity in two ways—by comparing people to each other and by comparing them to ourselves. A new study using brain imaging reveals that these forms of person knowledge are represented in separate areas of the brain.

Read moreDetails
Classical music may promote calmer, more stable fetal heart rhythms, study suggests
Cognitive Science

Classical music may promote calmer, more stable fetal heart rhythms, study suggests

May 6, 2025

Listening to classical music may calm the fetal heartbeat, according to new research. The study found that heart rate patterns became more orderly after music exposure.

Read moreDetails
Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men
Cognitive Science

Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men

May 6, 2025

New research shows women underestimate their spatial intelligence, even when they perform just as well as men. This gender gap in self-perception—shaped by personality traits like narcissism and modesty—could help explain why fewer women pursue STEM careers.

Read moreDetails
Scientists create a new color never before seen by human eyes
Cognitive Science

Scientists create a new color never before seen by human eyes

May 5, 2025

A groundbreaking study reveals that humans can experience an entirely new color, thanks to a system that stimulates individual cone cells in the retina. Scientists call the color “olo”—a brilliant blue-green that doesn't occur naturally in human vision.

Read moreDetails
Eye-tracking study: Women’s attention to facial masculinity tied to mating interests and self-perceived attractiveness
Cognitive Science

Negative images hijack attention and linger in memory, new study shows

May 3, 2025

A new study using a specially designed attention task finds that disturbing background images reliably disrupt focus and slow response times. These emotionally negative distractions also heighten negative feelings and are remembered more vividly, suggesting they hijack both attention and memory.

Read moreDetails
Earworms may reflect your brain’s tendency for habits, study suggests
Cognitive Science

Earworms may reflect your brain’s tendency for habits, study suggests

May 2, 2025

An online survey of adults in the U.K. found that frequent earworms were linked to a broad range of mental and motor habits. These findings hint that earworms might be mental echoes of a habit-prone brain.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Schizophrenia may accelerate brain ageing, new study finds

New study uncovers an intriguing liver–brain connection

Parental warmth—not poverty or danger—predicts positive world beliefs in adulthood

Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function

Little-known psychedelic drug shows promise in treating low motivation in depression

AI-driven brain training reduces impulsiveness in kids with ADHD, study finds

Neuroscientists use brain implants and AI to map language processing in real time

New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy