Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

A smile can increase or decrease how trustworthy you are perceived depending on your personality, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
July 19, 2020
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Though smiling generally increases trust, new research provides evidence that it can backfire for people with certain antisocial personality traits. The study, published in PLOS One, examined how personality traits and facial expressions interacted to influence perceptions of trustworthiness.

Previous research has found evidence that smiles increase cooperation while signs of personality disorder decrease cooperation. But what happens when smiles are combined with indications of pathology?

“I’ve had two lines of research in my career thus far. One investigates the communicative functions of facial expressions and the other investigates personality disorders. Here, I was able to combine these two lines by examining how people interact to others when given information about their emotional state (via their facial expression) and personality traits,” said study author Lawrence Ian Reed, a clinical assistant professor at New York University.

In the study, 262 participants were asked to play an economic investment game with another person. In reality, the other person was an invention of the researchers.

The participants read a brief description of the person, which described them as having traits consistent with either borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, or no personality pathology. These descriptions were paired with a brief video clip that showed them with either a neutral expression or a smile.

In the investment game, each participant was given $0.50 and was free to decide how much of that money he or she would give to the other person. The participants were informed that any amount given to the other person would be tripled. The other person would then either share back some of what they received or keep all of it. The money transferred by the participant to the other person served as an indicator of trust.

The researchers found that both smiles and personality traits influenced trust.

The participants tended to transfer less money when the other person was described as having borderline personality disorder or antisocial personality disorder in comparison to those described as having no personality pathology. Smiles increased the amount of money transferred for both those described as having either borderline personality pathology or no personality pathology, but decreased the amount transferred for those described as having antisocial personality pathology.

The findings indicate that “both your emotional state and your personality traits affect the ways that people perceive you and interact with you. Depending upon your personality, a smile can increase or decrease how you are perceived and treated by others,” Reed told PsyPost.

“In most cases, a smile makes someone appear more trustworthy. However, when displayed by an individual with antisocial traits, a smile can make them appear less trustworthy. Think the Joker or some other conniving character.”

In a follow-up with another 283 participants, the researchers repeated their experiment with slightly altered descriptions of the other person’s personality. They mostly replicated their results. However, this time around, smiles increased the amount of money transferred to those who were described as having antisocial personality pathology.

The findings suggest that how smiles influence the perception of trust “depends upon which antisocial traits are present,” Reed said.

The first experiment described the antisocial person as being disobedient, a frequent liar, and violently argumentative. The second experiment described the antisocial person as being remorseless, impulsive and reckless.

“There is great heterogeneity among those with antisocial personality disorder and only some variants have this effect. We’re hoping to find out which variants have this effect in the future,” Reed said.

“I’d like to note that although the smiles used in this study were posed, they were of the same muscular configuration and timing of a felt, genuine smile. That is, they included the zygomaticus major muscle pulling the lip corner upwards and the orbicularis oculi muscle raising the cheeks. There are many types of smiles and this is something that we might look into in the future,” he added.

The study, “In smiles we trust? Smiling in the context of antisocial and borderline personality pathology“, was authored by Lawrence Ian Reed, Ashley K. Meyer, Sara J. Okun, Cheryl K. Best, and Jill M. Hooley.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin6ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Gynandromorph research offers insight into the complexities of male sexual attraction
Sexism

Eye-tracking study shows people fixate longer on female aggressors than male ones

June 23, 2025

People pay more visual attention to female aggressors than male ones, but do not consistently judge their actions as more intentional or blameworthy, suggesting that female aggression is seen as unexpected rather than more morally significant.

Read moreDetails
Breakups can trigger trauma in emerging adults
Relationships and Sexual Health

Romantic breakups follow a two-stage decline that begins years before the split, study finds

June 23, 2025

A new study shows that romantic relationships often begin to unravel one to two years before they officially end. Researchers found a two-phase pattern of decline in satisfaction that could help identify when relationships are heading for a breakup.

Read moreDetails
It’s not digital illiteracy: Here’s why older adults are drawn to dubious news
Social Media

Believing “news will find me” is linked to sharing fake news, study finds

June 22, 2025

People who rely on social media to “stumble upon” news are more prone to spreading misinformation, according to a new longitudinal study.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails
Scientists observe reduced emotional distress in children living near greenery
Racism and Discrimination

Adults’ beliefs about children and race shift when a child’s race is specified, study finds

June 21, 2025

Specifying a child’s race alters how adults perceive their awareness of race and racism, according to new research. Black children are viewed as less “color-evasive” and more racially aware at earlier ages than White children or generic “children.”

Read moreDetails
Study helps untangle the complicated relationship between psychopathy and emotional awareness
Psychopathy

Psychopathic individuals recognize unfairness but are less likely to punish it

June 21, 2025

A new study shows that individuals with higher psychopathic traits are less likely to punish unfair behavior, especially when it costs them personally. The research suggests self-interest, not a lack of moral understanding, drives their reluctance to enforce social norms.

Read moreDetails
The neuroscience of why we cry happy tears
Social Psychology

The neuroscience of why we cry happy tears

June 20, 2025

Why do people cry happy tears? Neuroscience suggests these emotional outbursts occur when the brain becomes overwhelmed by joy, nostalgia, or relief. Far from being irrational, crying during joyful moments helps restore balance and deepen human connection.

Read moreDetails
Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders
Authoritarianism

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

June 20, 2025

A new study suggests that the way people learn to trust others early in life can shape their political ideology and preference for strong, dominant leaders—though not directly, but through dogmatic thinking and broader political attitudes.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Exposure to heavy metals is associated with higher likelihood of ADHD diagnosis

Eye-tracking study shows people fixate longer on female aggressors than male ones

Romantic breakups follow a two-stage decline that begins years before the split, study finds

Believing “news will find me” is linked to sharing fake news, study finds

A common parasite not only invades the brain — it can also decapitate human sperm

Almost all unmarried pregant women say that the fetus resembles the father, study finds

New neuroscience research reveals brain antioxidant deficit in depression

Scientists uncover kidney-to-brain route for Parkinson’s-related protein spread

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy