Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Adolescents with callous-unemotional traits are more likely to carry a gun or to use a gun during a crime, study finds

by Beth Ellwood
November 23, 2020
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

A study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry suggests that a temperament characterized by callousness and a lack of empathy can predict gun use among delinquent adolescents.

Given the widely-reported prevalence of gun violence in the United States, study authors Emily L. Robertson and her colleagues aimed to dig deeper into the motivating factors linking young offenders to gun use.

“Gun violence is a serious public health concern in the United States, with an estimated 133,895 people victimized by gun-related violence in 2017 . . . Given the societal cost and pain and suffering of those affected, reducing gun violence by youths is a critical public health concern,” Robertson and colleagues emphasize.

As previous research has tentatively linked callous-unemotional traits to adolescent gun use, the researchers were particularly interested in examining this personality dimension. According to the authors, callous-unemotional traits include, “limited guilt, reduced empathic concern, reduced displays of appropriate emotion, and a lack of concern over performance in important activities.”

In a study involving 1,215 male youths who had been arrested for the first time, Robertson and team examined whether callous-unemotional traits would predict the carrying of a gun or the use of a gun in a crime.

Within six weeks of their arrest, each youth, between the ages of 13 and 17, completed a baseline measurement of callous-unemotional traits. They were additionally asked how many of their friends owned a gun and how many carried a gun. The adolescents were then reassessed every six months for three years, and then a final time one year later, for a total of seven follow-up assessments.

At the follow-ups, the youth were asked if they had carried a gun since their last assessment. They were also asked if they had “carjacked someone, shot someone, shot at someone, committed armed robbery, participated in gang violence, or killed someone”, and if so, whether they had used a gun during that offense.

The researchers found that youth with elevated callous-unemotional traits were more likely to have carried a gun in the four years following their arrest. They were also more likely to have used a gun during a crime. Importantly, these findings were significant even after controlling for other relevant predictors such as impulse control, parental supervision, exposure to violence, and neighborhood dysfunction.

Next, the researchers explored whether this antisocial temperament would affect participants’ susceptibility to peer gun use. As they expected, peer gun carrying was linked to increased gun carrying but only in those either low or average in callous-unemotional traits.

“Thus,” the researchers infer, “adolescents with elevated callous-unemotional traits appear to carry and use guns at higher rates, regardless of gun carrying and ownership by their peers, consistent with previous research suggesting that these adolescents may be less susceptible to peer influences.”

They further point out that past research may have actually underestimated the influence of peer gun use, given that the majority of youth are low in callous-unemotional traits.

The researchers highlight the implications of their findings, suggesting that interventions targeting gun violence should include methods designed for adolescents with heightened callous-unemotional tendencies. The authors note that their study focused on male youth who were involved in the criminal justice system, and the findings cannot be generalized to young females or to everyday members of the community.

The study, “Callous-Unemotional Traits and Risk of Gun Carrying and Use During Crime”, was authored by Emily L. Robertson, Paul J. Frick, Toni M. Walker, Emily C. Kemp, James V. Ray, Laura C. Thornton, Tina D. Wall Myers, Laurence Steinberg, and Elizabeth Cauffman.

(Photo credit: Geoffrey Fairchild)

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Racism and Discrimination

Hispanic adolescents experience later sleep timing and greater social jet lag than peers, study finds

July 3, 2025

Hispanic adolescents reported later sleep timing, greater social jet lag, shorter weekday sleep, higher caffeine intake, and more evening screen time than peers. Screen use and stress, but not caffeine, were linked to delayed sleep and sleep misalignment.

Read moreDetails
Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Infidelity

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

July 3, 2025

The online shaming of unfaithful celebrities is a modern spectacle, but why do some join in while others don't? Researchers exploring this puzzle found a key predictor: a belief in a just world, which unexpectedly dampens outrage and blame.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Social Psychology

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

June 30, 2025

Individuals with higher mortality risk—as judged by actuarial life insurance data—tend to care less about long-term consequences. They show more impulsivity and less future planning, consistent with evolutionary theories that link time horizon to environmental and internal health cues.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

Genetic factors may influence how well exercise buffers against childhood trauma

Tips for parents in talking with your kids about your partner’s mental illness

Subjective cognitive struggles strongly linked to social recovery in depression

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

FACT CHECK: Does cheese cause nightmares? Here’s what the science actually says

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy