Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Brain-training games: What the evidence really says about their benefits

by Ian McDonough and Michael Dulas
January 11, 2025
in Cognitive Science
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

Some 2.3 million of U.S. adults over 65 – more than 4% – have a diagnosis of dementia. But even without a diagnosis, a certain amount of cognitive decline is normal as age sets in.

And whether it’s due to fear of cognitive decline or noticing lapses in cognition when we are stressed, many of us have had moments when we thought we could use an extra cognitive boost.

The good news is research has shown that people can make changes throughout adulthood that can help prevent or delay cognitive decline and even reduce their risk of dementia. These include quitting smoking and properly managing blood pressure.

In addition to these lifestyle changes, many people are turning to brain-training games, which claim to optimize your brain’s efficiency and capacity at any age. The makers of brain-training apps and games claim their products can do everything from staving off cognitive decline to improving your IQ.

But so far these claims have been met with mixed evidence.

We are cognitive neuroscientists who focus on brain health across the adult lifespan. We study how the brain informs cognition and the ways we can use brain imaging to understand cognitive and brain-training interventions. We aim to understand how our brains change naturally over time as well as what we can do about it.

Ongoing research shows what actually happens to the brain when it is engaged in new learning, offering a window into how people can sustain their brain health and how brain-training games can play a role. We believe these studies offer some strategies to train your brain the right way.

Brain training fact vs. fiction

Brain training is a set of tasks, often computerized, based on well-known tests to measure a type of cognition, but in a gamified manner.

Most brain-training games were designed to help participants master one or more specific skills. One example is a game that shows you a letter and number combination, where sometimes you must quickly identify whether the letter is even or odd, while other times you must switch to deciding whether the letter is a consonant or vowel. The game may increase in difficulty by requiring you to accomplish the task within a set time limit.

Such games are designed to require a high level of attention, fast processing speed and a flexible mind to alternate between the rules, known as executive functioning.

But it turns out that the specific skills learned in these games often do not translate to more general, real-world applications. Whether brain games meet their end goal of lasting cognitive improvement across a number of areas is still highly debated among psychologists. To make such claims requires rigorous evidence that playing a specific game improves cognitive or brain performance.

In 2016, in fact, the Federal Trade Commission issued a US$50 million penalty to one of the most popular brain-training games at the time, Lumosity, for misleading consumers into thinking that they could achieve higher levels of mental performance at work or at school and prevent or delay cognitive decline by using its product.

If improving on a brain game helps the player get better only at that or highly similar games, maybe game developers need a different approach.

 

Put some challenge into it

In a study dubbed the Synapse Project, in which one of us, Ian McDonough, helped assess the final outcomes, one group of participants were tasked with engaging in a new activity with which they had little experience. They were assigned to either digital photography or quilting. Though these activities were not games, they were meant to be engaging, challenging and done in a social environment.

Another group was assigned activities that involved little active learning, such as engaging in themed activities related to travel or cooking, or more solitary activities such as solving crossword puzzles, listening to music or watching classic movies. These groups met for 15 hours a week over 14 weeks. All participants were tested at the beginning and end of the study on various cognitive abilities.

Those assigned to the new, challenging activities showed significant gains in their memory, processing speed and reasoning abilities relative to those assigned to the less challenging activities. None of the participants were directly trained on these cognitive tests, which means that the challenging activities enhanced skills that transferred to new situations, such as remembering a list of words or solving abstract problems.

Brain scans of participants showed that over the course of the study, those engaged in the more challenging activities increased their neural efficiency. In other words, their brains didn’t have to work as hard to solve problems or recall information.

The study also showed that the more time participants spent on their projects, the bigger their brain gains and the better their memory was at the end of the 14 weeks.

One difference between the types of activities engaged in the Synapse Project and traditional brain training is whether activities are done in a group or alone. Although other studies have found a benefit to social interaction, the Synapse Project found no difference between the social and solitary activities in the low-challenge group. So, challenge rather than the social components seems to be the driver of maintaining cognitive and brain health.

What you can do to maintain a healthy brain

You might be thinking it’s time to take up digital photography or quilting. But in the end, it’s not about those specific tasks. What matters most is that you challenge yourself, which often comes naturally when doing something new.

The new learning that often is accompanied by a sense of effort – and sometimes frustration – requires accessing the resources in the frontal lobe, which manages thinking and judgment, and the parietal lobe, which processes attention and combines different sensory inputs. These regions constantly talk to each other to keep the mind adaptable in all kinds of situations and prevent the brain from going into “habit mode.”

Where does this leave us? Well, on the one hand, games touted as “training your brain” may not be the best solution compared with other routes to improving cognition.

Ironically, you might already be training your brain by playing effortful games that are not marketed as “brain training.” For example, games such as Tetris or real-time strategy games such as Rise of Nations have shown improvements in players’ cognition. Research has even shown that playing Super Mario 64 can result in increases in brain volume in regions such as the hippocampus, the memory center of the brain.

While little evidence suggests that any brain-training game or program globally improves cognition, some may improve specific aspects of it. As with other activities, challenge is key.

If you’re a word person, try a numbers-based game. If you love math, consider a word game or puzzle. Choosing a task that makes you feel uncomfortable gives you the best shot at maintaining and even improving your cognition. Once you start feeling a sense of ease and familiarity, that’s a sign that it’s time to switch tasks, change the game or at least add some challenge by advancing to a new level of difficulty that feels just beyond your reach.The Conversation

 

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

RELATED

Machine learning algorithm identifies three unique autism subtypes in males
Cognitive Science

Evolution may have capped human brain size to balance energy costs and survival

August 24, 2025

Human brain growth slowed about 300,000 years ago, research in Brain & Cognition suggests. Energy demands and shifting climates may have capped brain size, pushing survival toward cultural innovations and cognitive offloading rather than ever-larger skulls.

Read moreDetails
Women feel unsafe when objectified—but may still self-sexualize if the man is attractive or wealthy
Cognitive Science

Children’s self-estimates of IQ become more accurate with age—but only to a point

August 23, 2025

Researchers found that children under 10 often misjudge their own mental abilities. By middle childhood, their self-assessments grow more accurate—though the link between self-perception and measured intelligence remains modest throughout adolescence.

Read moreDetails
Obesity before pregnancy linked to autism-like behavior in male offspring, study finds
Cognitive Science

Children fall for a surprisingly simple numerical illusion — and it grows stronger with age

August 19, 2025

A new study suggests that a simple visual trick—connecting pairs of dots—can make people see fewer objects than are actually present. Children as young as five show this illusion, and its strength increases into adulthood.

Read moreDetails
Astronaut sleep study reveals how spaceflight alters rest patterns
Cognitive Science

New research shows the weird ways zero gravity messes with your body awareness

August 18, 2025

Scientists studying people aboard parabolic flights found that weightlessness can scramble your sense of where your arms are — but only in some cases. The findings suggest the brain uses multiple systems to monitor body position, not just one.

Read moreDetails
Lonely individuals show greater mood instability, especially with positive emotions, study finds
Cognitive Science

Game-based training can boost executive function and math skills in children

August 16, 2025

Children who played the Cucca Curiosa game showed improvements in working memory, cognitive flexibility, and math. The findings suggest that digital interventions designed to strengthen executive functioning may also indirectly support academic skills like arithmetic and problem-solving.

Read moreDetails
Lonely individuals show greater mood instability, especially with positive emotions, study finds
Cognitive Science

Researchers identify a key pathway linking socioeconomic status to children’s reading skills

August 16, 2025

New research published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience suggests that children’s reading skills are shaped more by their language environment than by structural brain differences. The study found that vocabulary and phonological awareness explain the influence of parental education on reading performance.

Read moreDetails
Positivity resonance predicts lasting love, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

Common infections during pregnancy unlikely to impact children’s intelligence, large study finds

August 15, 2025

Using data from over a quarter-million siblings, researchers found little evidence that common infections during pregnancy influence children’s intelligence or school performance, suggesting that most antibiotic use in pregnancy is unlikely to harm long-term cognitive development.

Read moreDetails
Positivity resonance predicts lasting love, according to new psychology research
Memory

Scientists uncover brain’s “reset button” for splitting memories into distinct events

August 15, 2025

A small brainstem region known as the locus coeruleus appears to help the brain segment experiences into distinct memories. New research links this neural activity to pupil responses and changes in hippocampal patterns during meaningful event transitions.

Read moreDetails

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Study finds Trump and Harris used distinct rhetoric in 2024—but shared more similarities than expected

Evolution may have capped human brain size to balance energy costs and survival

Cannabidiol shows potential to reverse some neuropsychological effects of social stress

Top AI models fail spectacularly when faced with slightly altered medical questions

A new frontier in autism research: predicting risk in babies as young as two months

Cerebellar-prefrontal brain connectivity may shape negative symptoms in psychosis

Children’s self-estimates of IQ become more accurate with age—but only to a point

Women feel unsafe when objectified—but may still self-sexualize if the man is attractive or wealthy

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy