Daughters who feel more attractive report stronger, more protective bonds with their fathers

A new study published in Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology sheds light on how a father’s background and perceptions influence the kind of relationship he has with his daughter. Fathers with more education and higher incomes were more likely to have emotionally supportive, protective, and less controlling relationships with their daughters. Daughters who saw themselves as physically attractive also tended to report stronger attachments to their fathers.

The research draws on life history theory and the daughter-guarding hypothesis to better understand what shapes paternal behavior toward daughters. Life history theory suggests that people’s developmental strategies—such as how they invest time and resources—are shaped by environmental factors like economic stability or unpredictability in early life. The daughter-guarding hypothesis proposes that fathers are especially protective of their daughters in ways that may reflect broader evolutionary concerns, such as reproductive strategies and family reputation.

The researchers were interested in how these ideas could be applied to modern father-daughter relationships. In particular, they wanted to know whether characteristics like a father’s education level, religiosity, political views, and income could help explain differences in how fathers relate to their daughters emotionally and behaviorally.

Prior research has shown that father involvement is linked to benefits such as improved self-regulation and healthier attachment styles in daughters. At the same time, father absence has been associated with earlier sexual development and lower emotional security. However, most previous studies have not focused specifically on how fathers’ life experiences and social positioning influence their parenting choices with daughters.

“We were interested in how life-history factors (i.e., socioeconomic status, education) in fathers were associated with their attachments to their daughters. There is limited research on this unique relationship, and we wanted to know explore it further and potentially stimulate more research questions into this topic,” said study author Ray Garza, an assistant professor of psychology at Texas A&M International University.

The researchers conducted two separate studies. In the first study, they surveyed 120 daughters between the ages of 18 and 21. These participants were asked to rate their fathers on four key dimensions: attachment (how emotionally close they felt to their father), support (whether their father helped them through personal challenges), protection (how much their father looked out for their safety), and control (how often their father tried to influence their decisions).

Daughters also reported on their own perceptions of their physical attractiveness, their father’s level of education, religiosity, and political orientation. The researchers then looked at how these variables related to the quality of the daughter-father relationship.

Statistical analyses revealed that daughters with more educated fathers reported stronger emotional attachments and more support and protection. Daughters who rated themselves as more attractive also tended to report higher levels of attachment, support, and protection from their fathers. Interestingly, they also reported experiencing less control.

Religiosity and political orientation were less consistent predictors. Daughters with more religious fathers reported receiving less protection, which was not expected based on previous research. Fathers’ political orientation showed no clear link to any of the measured outcomes in the daughters’ reports.

The second study surveyed 304 fathers who had at least one daughter. These men provided their own assessments of how they related to their daughters using the same four dimensions: attachment, support, protection, and control. They also reported on their income, education, and political views.

The researchers found similar patterns in this sample. Fathers who had higher incomes were more likely to report strong emotional attachments to their daughters. Political orientation was again linked to weaker attachment, with more conservative fathers reporting lower emotional closeness. Education was not a significant predictor in this second study.

Across both studies, attachment appeared to be central. Fathers who reported being more emotionally connected to their daughters also tended to be more supportive and protective. These positive behaviors, in turn, were associated with lower levels of control. The findings suggest that when strong emotional bonds are present, fathers may not feel the need to regulate their daughters’ lives as much. Instead, they may focus on offering support and ensuring their daughters feel safe.

“One of the main findings were that fathers’ education and financial stability were associated with being more attached and offering more support and protection,” Garza told PsyPost. “This was noted in both studies from the daughters’ perspective (Study 1) and fathers’ perspective (Study 2). Additionally, we did find that having a stronger attachment to fathers was associated with more support and protection, but less controlling behaviors directed towards daughters.”

The researchers interpret these findings through the lens of life history theory. In that framework, fathers with more education and financial stability may be more likely to follow what’s known as a “slower” life history strategy, which emphasizes long-term planning, emotional investment, and stable relationships. In contrast, fathers facing economic insecurity or instability might adopt “faster” strategies that are more short-term and survival-focused, which may translate into less emotional availability or greater control over their children’s choices.

The results also lend some support to the daughter-guarding hypothesis. Daughters who considered themselves more attractive reported receiving more protection and support, which might reflect fathers’ concerns about their daughters’ mate value and the risks associated with sexual or social exposure. This could manifest in protective behavior intended to delay daughters’ involvement in potentially risky relationships.

While the findings are consistent with some aspects of evolutionary and developmental psychology, there are caveats to consider. “A limitation was that we relied primarily on self-report data and limited indicators of life-history factors,” Garza said. “For instance, collecting other markers of development, such as pubertal timing, age of first menstruation, and sexual history, could provide a more comprehensive account on the role of father-daughter relationships.”

“We are continuing other research projects that investigate father-daughter relationships from a life-history perspective. These include using a diverse set of life-history factors and attachment scales and potentially creating and validating a father-daughter guarding scale.”

The study, “Daddy’s Little Girl: The Role of Life History in Paternal Investment Towards Daughters,” was authored by Ray Garza, Emily Woolman, Sepide Pazhouhi, and Farid Pazhoohi.