Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Attachment Styles

From childhood bonds to romantic ties: The science of psychological attachment

by Marissa Nivison and Sheri Madigan
May 21, 2024
in Attachment Styles
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

There has been a recent surge of attention toward attachment theory: from TikTok videos to online quizzes that claim to “assess your attachment style.” It’s become a hot topic, especially in the context of romantic relationships, with some articles claiming that one person (or partner’s) attachment styles are the reason why relationships fail.

As experts in developmental and clinical psychology focusing on attachment theory, we seek to provide an accessible resource to better understand the science of attachment, and what it means for one’s romantic relationships.

What is attachment?

Attachment theory stems from the field of developmental psychology. It is the notion that in the first year of life, the ways in which a parent and caregiver respond to a child’s needs shape a child’s expectation of relationships across their lifespan.

In research, attachment has been associated with well-being across the lifespan including: mental and physical health, brain functioning and even romantic relationships.

How is attachment related to romantic relationships?

Among professionals in the field, there is diversity in perspectives regarding how attachment relates with romantic relationships. As developmental psychologists, we tend to think that attachment is associated with romantic relationships through what we call the “internal working model.”

In childhood, when a parent is consistent and responsive in tending to their child, the child learns that their parent can be counted on in times of need. These expectations and beliefs about relationships are then internalized as a blueprint, sometimes in popular media referred to as a “love map.” Just like how an architect uses a blueprint to design a building, a child’s attachment to their parents provides a blueprint for understanding how to approach other relationships.

Based on this blueprint, people develop expectations of how relationships should work, and how other important people in their life, including partners, should respond to their needs.

Sometimes attachment is also described in terms of attachment “styles.” There are two overarching types of attachment: secure and insecure. Those with a secure attachment style tend to have expectations that their attachment figures (and later, partners) will be responsive, sensitive and caring in times of distress. People with secure “blueprints” find it easier to build new structures (i.e., relationships) with the same design.

People with insecure blueprints — such as disorganized, avoidant or anxious attachment styles — may face relationship challenges when their current relationship doesn’t align with their childhood experiences, and may need to renovate their blueprint design together with their partner.

Whether you think about attachment as a style or a love map, they both are related to expectations of relationships, which are shaped by past experiences.

In research we see that people who had consistent, reliable and sensitive parents are more likely to have more positive relationships — including friendships, teacher-child relationships and yes, romantic relationships too.

Relationships with parents and relationships with partners

Although we do see in research that better childhood relationships are associated with better romantic relationships, there is still a large part of the population who have good relationships with partners, despite their history of lower-quality relationships with their parents.

It is possible for romantic relationships to serve as a “healing relationship” and improve one’s own internal working model of relationships. Specifically, when a partner is consistently sensitive, responsive and available, a person may begin to adjust their blueprint and develop new expectations from relationships. Attachment theory consistently supports the idea that one’s patterns of attachment can change.

So, all in all, the answer is no: Your relationship with your parents influences but does not determine the quality of your romantic relationships.

Is attachment the reason why my relationships don’t work out?

It is possible that your expectations of a romantic relationship may not align with the expectations of your partner, and may affect the quality of the relationship. For example, sometimes individuals with insecure attachments may withdraw when they are upset, but their partner who has a secure attachment may be upset that their partner is not coming to them for comfort.

Thinking through your own attachment history and expectations of relationships may be a great opportunity for self-reflection, but it is important to remember that attachment is only one part of a relationship. Communication, trust and respect, to name a few, are also critically important aspects of a relationship.

Can I improve my attachment expectations?

The short answer: Yes! Improving attachment quality has been one of the cornerstones of attachment theory and research since its conception. Most commonly, attachment is targeted in childhood through interventions, but also in adulthood through individual therapy, or various forms of couples therapy, such as Emotionally Focused Therapy or the Gottman Method.

It is also possible that through positive relationships you may be able to improve your own expectations of relationships. There are many different avenues to explore, but improvement is always possible.

In sum, attachment can be an important factor in romantic relationships, but it is not a “catch-all” to be blamed for why relationships may not work out. Thinking about your own expectations for relationships and talking through those with your partner may do great things in improving the quality of your relationships!

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

RELATED

Trump supporters and insecure men more likely to value a large penis, according to new research
Attachment Styles

Study links unpredictable childhoods to poorer relationships via increased mating effort

January 18, 2026
Insecure attachment is linked to Machiavellian personality traits
Attachment Styles

Insecure attachment is linked to Machiavellian personality traits

January 12, 2026
Competitive athletes exhibit lower off-field aggression and enhanced brain connectivity
Attachment Styles

Distinct personality traits found in those who use sex to cope

December 23, 2025
New research reveals the impact of optimism on problem solving in romantic relationships
Attachment Styles

How partners talk about sex plays a key role in the link between attachment and satisfaction

December 9, 2025
Why do women cheat? New study reveals complex motivations behind female infidelity
Attachment Styles

New research highlights the role of family background and attachment in shaping infidelity intentions

November 22, 2025
The psychology of forbidden pleasures: New insights into paraphilic interests uncovered
Attachment Styles

Does your relationship with your parents influence your sexual fantasies?

November 9, 2025
People with attachment anxiety are more vulnerable to problematic AI use
Artificial Intelligence

People with attachment anxiety are more vulnerable to problematic AI use

October 17, 2025
Study uncovers a gendered double standard for interracial relationships
Attachment Styles

Attachment insecurity shapes mentalization in interracial long-distance relationships

September 13, 2025

PsyPost Merch

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Emotional abuse predicts self-loathing more strongly than other childhood traumas

Sycophantic chatbots inflate people’s perceptions that they are “better than average”

Preschool gardening helps young children eat better and stay active

FDA-cleared brain stimulation device fails to beat placebo in ADHD trial

Study finds education level doesn’t stop narcissists from believing conspiracy theories

Frequent pornography use does not always indicate a problem, new study suggests

Psilocybin microdosing fails to boost cognitive performance in rigorous trials

New study identifies a “woke” counterpart on the political right characterized by white grievance

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • The science behind why accessibility drives revenue in the fashion sector
  • How AI and political ideology intersect in the market for sensitive products
  • Researchers track how online shopping is related to stress
  • New study reveals why some powerful leaders admit mistakes while others double down
  • Study reveals the cycle of guilt and sadness that follows a FOMO impulse buy
         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy