Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Attachment Styles

From childhood bonds to romantic ties: The science of psychological attachment

by Marissa Nivison and Sheri Madigan
May 21, 2024
in Attachment Styles
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

There has been a recent surge of attention toward attachment theory: from TikTok videos to online quizzes that claim to “assess your attachment style.” It’s become a hot topic, especially in the context of romantic relationships, with some articles claiming that one person (or partner’s) attachment styles are the reason why relationships fail.

As experts in developmental and clinical psychology focusing on attachment theory, we seek to provide an accessible resource to better understand the science of attachment, and what it means for one’s romantic relationships.

What is attachment?

Attachment theory stems from the field of developmental psychology. It is the notion that in the first year of life, the ways in which a parent and caregiver respond to a child’s needs shape a child’s expectation of relationships across their lifespan.

In research, attachment has been associated with well-being across the lifespan including: mental and physical health, brain functioning and even romantic relationships.

How is attachment related to romantic relationships?

Among professionals in the field, there is diversity in perspectives regarding how attachment relates with romantic relationships. As developmental psychologists, we tend to think that attachment is associated with romantic relationships through what we call the “internal working model.”

In childhood, when a parent is consistent and responsive in tending to their child, the child learns that their parent can be counted on in times of need. These expectations and beliefs about relationships are then internalized as a blueprint, sometimes in popular media referred to as a “love map.” Just like how an architect uses a blueprint to design a building, a child’s attachment to their parents provides a blueprint for understanding how to approach other relationships.

Based on this blueprint, people develop expectations of how relationships should work, and how other important people in their life, including partners, should respond to their needs.

Sometimes attachment is also described in terms of attachment “styles.” There are two overarching types of attachment: secure and insecure. Those with a secure attachment style tend to have expectations that their attachment figures (and later, partners) will be responsive, sensitive and caring in times of distress. People with secure “blueprints” find it easier to build new structures (i.e., relationships) with the same design.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

People with insecure blueprints — such as disorganized, avoidant or anxious attachment styles — may face relationship challenges when their current relationship doesn’t align with their childhood experiences, and may need to renovate their blueprint design together with their partner.

Whether you think about attachment as a style or a love map, they both are related to expectations of relationships, which are shaped by past experiences.

In research we see that people who had consistent, reliable and sensitive parents are more likely to have more positive relationships — including friendships, teacher-child relationships and yes, romantic relationships too.

Relationships with parents and relationships with partners

Although we do see in research that better childhood relationships are associated with better romantic relationships, there is still a large part of the population who have good relationships with partners, despite their history of lower-quality relationships with their parents.

It is possible for romantic relationships to serve as a “healing relationship” and improve one’s own internal working model of relationships. Specifically, when a partner is consistently sensitive, responsive and available, a person may begin to adjust their blueprint and develop new expectations from relationships. Attachment theory consistently supports the idea that one’s patterns of attachment can change.

So, all in all, the answer is no: Your relationship with your parents influences but does not determine the quality of your romantic relationships.

Is attachment the reason why my relationships don’t work out?

It is possible that your expectations of a romantic relationship may not align with the expectations of your partner, and may affect the quality of the relationship. For example, sometimes individuals with insecure attachments may withdraw when they are upset, but their partner who has a secure attachment may be upset that their partner is not coming to them for comfort.

Thinking through your own attachment history and expectations of relationships may be a great opportunity for self-reflection, but it is important to remember that attachment is only one part of a relationship. Communication, trust and respect, to name a few, are also critically important aspects of a relationship.

Can I improve my attachment expectations?

The short answer: Yes! Improving attachment quality has been one of the cornerstones of attachment theory and research since its conception. Most commonly, attachment is targeted in childhood through interventions, but also in adulthood through individual therapy, or various forms of couples therapy, such as Emotionally Focused Therapy or the Gottman Method.

It is also possible that through positive relationships you may be able to improve your own expectations of relationships. There are many different avenues to explore, but improvement is always possible.

In sum, attachment can be an important factor in romantic relationships, but it is not a “catch-all” to be blamed for why relationships may not work out. Thinking about your own expectations for relationships and talking through those with your partner may do great things in improving the quality of your relationships!

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Previous Post

Psychopathic leaders use surface acting to gain trust, but their attempts at deep acting often backfire

Next Post

Superagers’ brains show superior white matter health, study finds

RELATED

Low user engagement limits effectiveness of digital mental health interventions
Attachment Styles

Hiding your true self in a relationship is linked to a higher risk of cheating

March 26, 2026
Women who are open to “sugar arrangements” tend to show deeper psychological vulnerabilities
Attachment Styles

Laughter plays a unique role in building a secure father-child relationship, new research suggests

March 14, 2026
Who lives a good single life? New data highlights the role of autonomy and attachment
Attachment Styles

Who lives a good single life? New data highlights the role of autonomy and attachment

February 14, 2026
Younger women find men with beards less attractive than older women do
Attachment Styles

Your attachment style predicts which activities boost romantic satisfaction

February 13, 2026
Narcissistic students perceive student-professor flirting as less morally troubling
Attachment Styles

Attachment anxiety shapes how emotions interfere with self-control

February 8, 2026
Data from 560,000 students reveals a disturbing mental health shift after 2016
Attachment Styles

Early maternal touch may encourage sympathy and helping behaviors in adolescence

February 2, 2026
Vulnerable narcissism is strongly associated with insecure attachment, study finds
Attachment Styles

Vulnerable narcissism is strongly associated with insecure attachment, study finds

January 28, 2026
Trump supporters and insecure men more likely to value a large penis, according to new research
Attachment Styles

Study links unpredictable childhoods to poorer relationships via increased mating effort

January 18, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • When sales managers serve first, salespeople stay longer and sell more confidently
  • Emotional intelligence linked to better sales performance
  • When a goal-driven boss ignores relationships, manipulative employees may fight back
  • When salespeople fail to hit their targets, inner drive matters more than bonus checks
  • The “dark” personality traits that predict sales success — and when they backfire

LATEST

Cannabis intoxication broadly impairs multiple memory types, new study shows

Autism risk genes are shared across human ancestries, large genome study reveals

Scientists identify a brain signal that reveals whether depression therapies will work

Large-scale study links autoimmune diseases to higher rates of depression and anxiety

Smoked cannabis reduces immediate alcohol consumption in controlled laboratory trial

Vulnerable narcissism is linked to intense celebrity worship via parasocial relationships

Brain scans reveal the neural fingerprints of dark personality traits

The psychological divide between Democrats and Republicans during democratic backsliding

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc