Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Having an unsupportive romantic partner is associated with neurophysiological changes in error processing

by Eric W. Dolan
April 21, 2022
in Cognitive Science, Neuroimaging, Relationships and Sexual Health
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

Being subjected to unsupportive behaviors from a romantic partner appears to influence how the brain processes mistakes, according to new research published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology. The findings indicate that unsupportive behaviors are associated with heightened neural reactivity after committing an error in the presence of one’s partner.

“Romantic relationships are a huge part of many people’s lives, but there is still so much that we don’t know about how they impact our day-to-day experiences,” said Erin Palmwood, an assistant professor at the University of Mary Washington and a licensed clinical psychologist.

“In this study, we wanted to explore how supportive and unsupportive messages from our romantic partners impact our reactions to the mistakes we make, which might help us understand how these relationships contribute to things like adaptive risk-taking, goal-striving, and anxious avoidance.”

The final sample for the study included 20 participants (who were recruited from undergraduate psychology courses) and their romantic partners. The participants had been in a committed relationship with their partners for about 1.29 years.

The participants and their partners first independently completed a variety of psychological assessments, including the Significant Others Scale and the Social Undermining Scale. The Significant Others Scale measures levels of perceived support from romantic partners, while the Social Undermining Scale measures perceived unsupportive behaviors, such as criticism and insults.

The researchers had the participants return to the lab approximately two weeks later, where they twice completed the Eriksen Flanker Task, an assessment of selective attention and executive control. During one session, the participants completed the task while seated in an empty room. During another session, the participants completed the task with their partners seated beside them. (The partner was instructed to remain silent.)

Palmwood and her colleagues used electroencephalography to measure the participants’ brain responses as they completed the tasks. They were particularly interested in a pattern of electrical brain activity known as error-related negativity (ERN), which occurs after a person makes a behavioral mistake. “ERN amplitude is reflective of the degree to which an individual considers an error to be threatening,” the researchers explained.

Palmwood and her colleagues found that unsupportive behavior was associated with changes in error processing. Participants who perceived more unsupportive behavior from their partner tended to have increased ERN responses when errors were committed — but only when seated next to their partner.

“When your partner behaves unsupportively toward you, you tend to react more strongly to the mistakes that you make,” Palmwood told PsyPost. “This could be because an unsupportive partner might be highly critical of your mistakes, or because you may have internalized some self-critical responses as a result of hearing criticism so often from your partner. This might help explain the link between unsupportive romantic relationships and things like anxiety, depression, and decreased goal attainment.”

But the researchers said that future studies are needed to confirm the generalizability of the findings.

“A major limitation of this study is its relatively small and homogeneous sample, as well as its exclusive use of undergraduate student participants,” Palmwood explained. “This research should be replicated on larger, more diverse samples that include older adults in long-term relationships in order to enhance the generalizability of these findings.”

The study, “Unsupportive romantic partner behaviors increase neural reactivity to mistakes“, was authored by Erin N. Palmwood and Robert F. Simons.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin49ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Where you flirt matters: New research shows setting shapes romantic success
Dating

Where you flirt matters: New research shows setting shapes romantic success

May 19, 2025

A new study finds that where a romantic interaction occurs significantly influences its perceived success. Settings judged as socially appropriate—like bars or dating apps—make romantic overtures more likely to be accepted, regardless of the initiator’s attractiveness or familiarity.

Read moreDetails
Psychedelic’s anti-anxiety effects can be separated from hallucinations by targeting specific brain circuits
Neuroimaging

Psychedelic’s anti-anxiety effects can be separated from hallucinations by targeting specific brain circuits

May 19, 2025

A mouse study published in Science shows that stimulating a specific set of brain cells activated by a psychedelic drug can reduce anxiety without triggering hallucination-like behavior, pointing to new possibilities for targeted mental health treatments.

Read moreDetails
Brain oscillations reveal dynamic shifts in creative thought during metaphor generation
Cognitive Science

Brain oscillations reveal dynamic shifts in creative thought during metaphor generation

May 19, 2025

A new study reveals that creative metaphor generation involves shifting patterns of brain activity, with alpha oscillations playing a key role at different stages of the process, offering fresh insight into the neural dynamics behind verbal creativity.

Read moreDetails
Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds
Cognitive Science

Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds

May 19, 2025

A new study using direct brain recordings reveals that human economic decision-making is not localized to a single brain region. Instead, multiple areas work together, with high-frequency activity encoding risk, reward probability, and the final choice itself.

Read moreDetails
Scientists finds altered attention-related brain connectivity in youth with anxiety
Anxiety

Scientists finds altered attention-related brain connectivity in youth with anxiety

May 19, 2025

A large neuroimaging study has found that generalized anxiety disorder in youth is linked to increased connectivity in brain circuits involved in attention and emotion, and that these patterns may change with symptom remission.

Read moreDetails
New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms
Attractiveness

New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms

May 18, 2025

A new study of indigenous men in Papua, Indonesia, found that exposure to topless women during youth did not reduce sexual interest in female breasts—suggesting male attraction to breasts may stem from evolved biology rather than cultural taboos.

Read moreDetails
Amphetamine scrambles the brain’s sense of time by degrading prefrontal neuron coordination
Neuroimaging

Amphetamine scrambles the brain’s sense of time by degrading prefrontal neuron coordination

May 18, 2025

Researchers have found that amphetamine alters how the brain processes time, increasing variability in the activity of neurons that encode temporal information. The study provides insight into how the drug affects executive function and decision-making at the neural level.

Read moreDetails
Study finds couples who cuddle at bedtime feel more secure and less stressed
Attachment Styles

Study finds couples who cuddle at bedtime feel more secure and less stressed

May 17, 2025

Couples who fall asleep while cuddling or touching each other report lower stress and fewer signs of insecure attachment, according to a new study. Surprisingly, people’s individual sleep preferences don’t influence how close they sleep to their partner.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Where you flirt matters: New research shows setting shapes romantic success

Psychedelic’s anti-anxiety effects can be separated from hallucinations by targeting specific brain circuits

New research reveals aging shifts gender stereotypes in unexpected ways

Optimistic individuals are more likely to respond to SSRI antidepressants

Brain oscillations reveal dynamic shifts in creative thought during metaphor generation

Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds

Scientists finds altered attention-related brain connectivity in youth with anxiety

From fixed pulses to smart stimulation: Parkinson’s treatment takes a leap forward

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy