Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Insufficient sleep could be suppressing voter turnout, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
June 12, 2019
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Why do people decide not to vote? New research published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour provides evidence that lack of sleep may play a role. The study found that insufficient sleep is associated with lower voter turnout and reduced intentions to vote.

“Civic participation holds democracy together. However, measures of civic participation like voting in democratic elections have languished — or by some accounts declined — in recent years,” said study author John Holbein, an assistant professor

“This is true despite the fact that more people than ever are interested in politics and say that they want to participate. However, many people who show a genuine interest in being active participants in democracy fail to actually follow through and engage. We wanted to know why that is.”

“While brainstorming ideas with my coauthors, David Dickinson and Jerome Schafer, we came up with the idea that it might be because voters are simply too tired to actually follow through on their good intentions. We know that people are sleeping less and less over time. And we know that these patterns affect performance in the labor force. Could a lack of sleep also be having a negative effect on citizen engagement? This project set out to see if that was actually the case.”

For their study, the researchers examined data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and the German Socioeconomic Panel. Both of the large nationally representative longitudinal surveys included questions about civic participation and sleeping.

By analyzing Census data, Holbein and his colleagues also found that individuals living near the eastern side of U.S. time-zone boundaries tended to sleep less and were also less likely to vote.

The researchers then conducted a controlled experiment to confirm the findings. More than one thousand participants were recruited and surveyed via Amazon Mechanical Turk. The participants were randomly assigned to complete a second survey either in the afternoon or between 3:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m at night.

Holbein and his colleagues found that participants who completed the survey in the middle of the night were less willing to sign a petition to increase recycling in their community, less willing to donate money to the Red Cross, and expressed a lower intention to vote in an upcoming election.

“In the paper, we present evidence from three different study designs that tired people are much less likely to do the types of things that hold democracies and communities together. Tired individuals are less likely to vote, donate, and sign petitions for a good cause,” he told PsyPost.

“This shows that many people want to participate but are just too tired to do so. Sleep deprivation has real consequences for the social health of our communities. Not only does it make it harder for people to get their jobs done or to do well in school it also makes them less likely to contribute in ways that build democracies.”

The study — like all research — includes some caveats.

“There are two primary questions lingering from this study. First, we don’t really know who is most affected by sleep deprivation. It could be the case that sleep deprivation has larger effects for individuals who are already unlikely to participate,” Holbein explained.

“When it comes to voting, it could be the case that Democrats are affected differently than Republicans (for example). If, that’s the case, then sleep deprivation may have the potential to swing election outcomes.”

“Second, we’re still waiting to see what the effect of long-term sleep deprivation is. Our experiment tested the effects of short-term sleep deprivation. We’re still waiting to see how big of an effect chronic sleep deprivation has on prosocial behavior. We’re working on answering these questions in subsequent studies,” Holbein said.

“We sometimes think that not getting enough sleep only affects us. But, that’s not true! Sleep deprivation makes us more selfish and willing to focus on ourselves rather than others. Doing all that we can to make sure that we get enough sleep is vitally important for the health of our communities and our democracy

The study, “Insufficient sleep reduces voting and other prosocial behaviours“, was authored by John B. Holbein, Jerome P. Schafer and David L. Dickinson.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Racism and Discrimination

Hispanic adolescents experience later sleep timing and greater social jet lag than peers, study finds

July 3, 2025

Hispanic adolescents reported later sleep timing, greater social jet lag, shorter weekday sleep, higher caffeine intake, and more evening screen time than peers. Screen use and stress, but not caffeine, were linked to delayed sleep and sleep misalignment.

Read moreDetails
Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Infidelity

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

July 3, 2025

The online shaming of unfaithful celebrities is a modern spectacle, but why do some join in while others don't? Researchers exploring this puzzle found a key predictor: a belief in a just world, which unexpectedly dampens outrage and blame.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Social Psychology

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

June 30, 2025

Individuals with higher mortality risk—as judged by actuarial life insurance data—tend to care less about long-term consequences. They show more impulsivity and less future planning, consistent with evolutionary theories that link time horizon to environmental and internal health cues.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Hispanic adolescents experience later sleep timing and greater social jet lag than peers, study finds

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

Genetic factors may influence how well exercise buffers against childhood trauma

Tips for parents in talking with your kids about your partner’s mental illness

Subjective cognitive struggles strongly linked to social recovery in depression

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy