PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Narcissism and sadism predict likelihood of using ‘brainteaser’ questions in a job interview

by Eric W. Dolan
January 20, 2019
Reading Time: 2 mins read
(Photo credit: fizkes)

(Photo credit: fizkes)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research has found a link between brainteaser interview questions and several negative personality traits. The findings appear in the journal Applied Psychology.

The researchers behind the study were interested in brainteaser questions — such as “Why is a tennis ball fuzzy?” — because they’re reportedly being used by several large tech companies. It is unclear how effective such questions are when evaluating potential employees, but research has found that interviewees find the questions distressing.

“Use of brainteasers in the hiring process provides little information about the suitability of the job applicant but considerable information about the callousness of the interviewer,” said co-author Scott Highhouse, of Bowling Green State University, in Ohio.

In a study of 736 working adults, the participants were presented with a long list of interview questions, which included traditional questions, behavioural questions (such as “Tell me about a time when you failed”), and brainteaser questions (such as “How would you explain what a chair was to an alien?”) They were asked to rate how appropriate they thought each question was.

The participants also completed measures of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, sadism, and social competence.

Participants who considered the brainteaser questions as more appropriate tended to be more narcissistic, more sadistic, and less socially competent. They were also more likely to agree with statements such as “I believe it is important to rely on your intuition when hiring employees.”

The researchers replicated these findings in another sample of 496 adults who had made a final decision about whether to hire a job applicant.

“The present study provides evidence of individual differences in the perceived appropriateness of brainteaser questions. These results are important because these types of questions can potentially create negative perceptions of fairness and generally negative applicant outcomes,” the researchers said.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Understanding the impetus behind using these potentially detrimental questions, therefore, can help organisations to curb their use during the hiring process and identify those who may be more effective recruiters and interviewers.”

The study, “Dark Motives and Elective Use of Brainteaser Interview Questions“, was authored by Scott Highhouse, Christopher D. Nye, and Don C. Zhang.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Screen time not consistently tied to children’s emotional or behavioral problems in a large Scottish study
  • Emotional blunting is common in depression and bipolar disorder, even after symptoms ease
  • How your personality “acts as an invisible architect for your career,” according to new research
  • The invisible chore that may matter more for women’s relationship happiness than housework
  • The genetic signature of assortative mating appears to be growing stronger in the United States

Science of Money

  • How giving AI a personality changes the way consumers buy
  • How short expert recommendation lists change online shopping behavior
  • Why saying “I like it” is more persuasive than “you will like it,” according to psychology
  • When wives earn more, do husbands do more chores?
  • The hidden trade-offs of using venture debt to delay equity dilution

Recent

  • Researchers identify a factor linked to how much happier couples are than singles
  • Scientists uncover a possible trade-off in how the hippocampus replays new memories
  • Is fatness a feminist issue?
  • Patience with life’s small annoyances is linked to lower anxiety, but it doesn’t buffer spiritual struggles
  • When women share a husband, physical fights between co-wives are common across cultures
  • Brain injury triggers unexpected hormone release in progenitor cells
  • Brain entropy during a psychedelic trip tracks later gains in insight and well-being
  • A chemical produced by gut bacteria may accelerate Alzheimer’s disease
  • People who worry more tend to have more negative dreams, study finds
  • How extreme boredom can push people toward aggressive behavior

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc