PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Narcissism and sadism predict likelihood of using ‘brainteaser’ questions in a job interview

by Eric W. Dolan
January 20, 2019
Reading Time: 2 mins read
(Photo credit: fizkes)

(Photo credit: fizkes)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research has found a link between brainteaser interview questions and several negative personality traits. The findings appear in the journal Applied Psychology.

The researchers behind the study were interested in brainteaser questions — such as “Why is a tennis ball fuzzy?” — because they’re reportedly being used by several large tech companies. It is unclear how effective such questions are when evaluating potential employees, but research has found that interviewees find the questions distressing.

“Use of brainteasers in the hiring process provides little information about the suitability of the job applicant but considerable information about the callousness of the interviewer,” said co-author Scott Highhouse, of Bowling Green State University, in Ohio.

In a study of 736 working adults, the participants were presented with a long list of interview questions, which included traditional questions, behavioural questions (such as “Tell me about a time when you failed”), and brainteaser questions (such as “How would you explain what a chair was to an alien?”) They were asked to rate how appropriate they thought each question was.

The participants also completed measures of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, sadism, and social competence.

Participants who considered the brainteaser questions as more appropriate tended to be more narcissistic, more sadistic, and less socially competent. They were also more likely to agree with statements such as “I believe it is important to rely on your intuition when hiring employees.”

The researchers replicated these findings in another sample of 496 adults who had made a final decision about whether to hire a job applicant.

“The present study provides evidence of individual differences in the perceived appropriateness of brainteaser questions. These results are important because these types of questions can potentially create negative perceptions of fairness and generally negative applicant outcomes,” the researchers said.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Understanding the impetus behind using these potentially detrimental questions, therefore, can help organisations to curb their use during the hiring process and identify those who may be more effective recruiters and interviewers.”

The study, “Dark Motives and Elective Use of Brainteaser Interview Questions“, was authored by Scott Highhouse, Christopher D. Nye, and Don C. Zhang.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Why is autism increasing? Scientists are converging on an unglamorous answer
  • People with higher autistic traits tend to avoid positive relationship-maintenance tactics
  • The neuroscience of pity: how attractiveness and morality shape empathy
  • Emotional distress when stopping antidepressants appears to be due to withdrawal, not relapse
  • Scientists identify the nose-to-brain circuit that makes slow breathing calming

Science of Money

  • Customer-created shelf gaps reduce purchase intentions
  • How personality traits help graduates avoid the overeducation trap
  • How surviving a health crisis changes cryptocurrency investment behavior
  • The psychological weight of debt: how financial obligations influence mental health
  • How high school jobs impact mid-life career success

Recent

  • People in strained relationships show somewhat higher preference for hearing lies
  • Scientists identify an overlooked brain region that sustains fear responses
  • Why is autism increasing? Scientists are converging on an unglamorous answer
  • Ayahuasca combined with grief therapy shows promise in easing severe bereavement
  • Study reveals which values actually stop voters from supporting antidemocratic politicians
  • Probiotic bacteria might offer a temporary boost for sleep and vitality in mild depression
  • People with higher autistic traits tend to avoid positive relationship-maintenance tactics
  • A simple tactic can increase likability for socially anxious people, new research suggests
  • Popular AI models use arbitrary facial features to predict criminality and job performance
  • Suicidal behaviors are more heritable than depression, new twin study finds

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc