PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Narcissism and sadism predict likelihood of using ‘brainteaser’ questions in a job interview

by Eric W. Dolan
January 20, 2019
Reading Time: 2 mins read
(Photo credit: fizkes)

(Photo credit: fizkes)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research has found a link between brainteaser interview questions and several negative personality traits. The findings appear in the journal Applied Psychology.

The researchers behind the study were interested in brainteaser questions — such as “Why is a tennis ball fuzzy?” — because they’re reportedly being used by several large tech companies. It is unclear how effective such questions are when evaluating potential employees, but research has found that interviewees find the questions distressing.

“Use of brainteasers in the hiring process provides little information about the suitability of the job applicant but considerable information about the callousness of the interviewer,” said co-author Scott Highhouse, of Bowling Green State University, in Ohio.

In a study of 736 working adults, the participants were presented with a long list of interview questions, which included traditional questions, behavioural questions (such as “Tell me about a time when you failed”), and brainteaser questions (such as “How would you explain what a chair was to an alien?”) They were asked to rate how appropriate they thought each question was.

The participants also completed measures of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, sadism, and social competence.

Participants who considered the brainteaser questions as more appropriate tended to be more narcissistic, more sadistic, and less socially competent. They were also more likely to agree with statements such as “I believe it is important to rely on your intuition when hiring employees.”

The researchers replicated these findings in another sample of 496 adults who had made a final decision about whether to hire a job applicant.

“The present study provides evidence of individual differences in the perceived appropriateness of brainteaser questions. These results are important because these types of questions can potentially create negative perceptions of fairness and generally negative applicant outcomes,” the researchers said.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Understanding the impetus behind using these potentially detrimental questions, therefore, can help organisations to curb their use during the hiring process and identify those who may be more effective recruiters and interviewers.”

The study, “Dark Motives and Elective Use of Brainteaser Interview Questions“, was authored by Scott Highhouse, Christopher D. Nye, and Don C. Zhang.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Scientists identify 19 core dimensions of positive mental health in new consensus study
  • Brain imaging study links childhood trauma to chronic procrastination in adulthood
  • Study links short-form video addiction to a decline in teenagers’ academic coping skills
  • Scientists discover a previously unknown cognitive benefit of aerobic exercise
  • New research finds women’s buttocks play a more stable role in male physical attraction than breasts

Science of Money

  • The networking blind spot that could be holding back your next big product
  • Did voters punish inflation or pay cuts? A county-by-county look at the 2024 election
  • Can criticism be a sign of brand loyalty? A study of gaming communities says yes
  • What a brainwave headset revealed about why some traders make money and others don’t
  • When beauty backfires: Why some shoppers steer clear of good-looking salespeople

Recent

  • Daytime emotional suppression does not affect the emotional tone of dreams
  • Single dose of rapamycin rapidly reduces autism-like traits in adult mice
  • Evolving political views linked to changes in brain activity
  • Dogs can distinguish between specific negative human facial expressions, brain scans show
  • How sexual arousal distorts men’s perception of women’s boundaries
  • New study reveals how running trains the body to handle psychological stress
  • Mentally engaging parenting linked to better working memory development
  • Newly engineered psychedelic shows therapeutic promise without gastrointestinal distress
  • Early giftedness rarely lasts into adulthood, large developmental study finds
  • Frequent cannabis use is linked to higher morning cortisol levels

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc