Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Dark Triad

Natural body posture correlates with dominance and antisocial behavior, study shows

by Eric W. Dolan
October 9, 2024
in Dark Triad
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

A recent study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found a connection between an individual’s natural body posture and their personality traits. Researchers discovered that how a person habitually stands—when not influenced by external factors—reflects their attitudes toward dominance, submission, and social hierarchy. Importantly, this relationship appears stable over time, suggesting that the way a person naturally stands might be a consistent reflection of their underlying personality.

For centuries, body posture has been viewed as an essential part of emotional and social communication. Charles Darwin, for instance, emphasized the role of body language in emotional expression. While many studies have looked at temporary body language—how someone stands or moves during a specific interaction—there has been less research on whether everyday, habitual body posture carries meaningful information about a person’s personality. The researchers aimed to answer this question by investigating whether natural posture correlates with stable personality traits.

“Many studies have previously investigated how adopting a specific posture (e.g., expansive vs. contractive in the ‘power posing’ paradigm) can change people’s social perceptions, interactions, and even their own mood and behavior,” said study authors Soren Wainio-Theberge and Jorge L. Armony of McGill University. “In psychology, we call this a ‘state’ variable—something that changes from moment to moment or day to day, like your mood. People also vary in terms of stable, ‘trait’ characteristics, such as personality. We were interested in assessing whether, in addition to its effects on state variables, natural body posture (i.e., posture when they’re not doing anything in particular) could also reflect a trait which would relate to specific personality characteristics.”

To examine whether natural body posture is a stable trait that reflects deeper personality characteristics, the researchers conducted a series of five studies.

In the first study, 421 participants were recruited, but after quality checks, data from 369 participants were analyzed. They were asked to take four photos of themselves in a natural standing position: from the front, back, left, and right. These photos were analyzed using a machine-learning tool called OpenPOSE, which detected key body points and calculated angles related to their posture, including angles of the neck, shoulders, spine, and hips.

Along with the posture assessment, participants completed a comprehensive set of personality questionnaires. These included scales measuring traits like social dominance orientation, psychopathy, empathy, anger control, and other relevant socio-affective dimensions.

The results revealed a significant relationship between an upright, erect posture and certain personality traits. Participants who naturally stood with a more upright posture, characterized by a straight neck and an open body stance, were more likely to exhibit personality traits associated with dominance, competitiveness, and antisocial tendencies. Specifically, these individuals scored higher on social dominance orientation and primary psychopathy, while scoring lower on empathy and anger control.

“We were surprised that antisocial traits were most consistently associated with posture, rather than depression and negative emotion,” Wainio-Theberge and Armony told PsyPost. “Previous studies in clinical depression have found more hunched postures in depressed patients, and while we saw some evidence for that in our data, antisocial traits were far more consistent.”

In the second study, the researchers aimed to test whether the posture-personality relationship observed in Study 1 reflected stable, trait-like behavior or if it varied over time. To do this, they conducted a follow-up study with a subset of 107 participants from the original sample. These participants repeated the posture assessment five weeks after the initial session.

The results showed that participants’ postures remained stable over the five-week interval. The angles of their neck, shoulders, and other key body points stayed consistent across both sessions, indicating that natural posture is not just a transient state but a stable individual trait. The posture-personality relationship observed in Study 1 was also replicated in this follow-up study.

The third study sought to directly test whether the natural upright postures observed in Study 1 could be interpreted as dominant postures. In this study, 104 participants were asked to adopt specific dominant and submissive poses. They were provided with no additional instructions besides being told to assume a “dominant” and a “submissive” pose, with the order counterbalanced across participants.

The researchers used logistic regression to develop a classifier that could distinguish between the dominant and submissive postures based on the postural angles measured in the photos. This classifier was then applied to the natural posture data from Study 1 to classify participants’ natural stances as either dominant or submissive.

The results confirmed that the upright, erect postures observed in Study 1 were indeed interpreted as dominant postures. Participants’ dominant poses were characterized by open, upright body positions, with a straight neck and forward-leaning hips, while submissive poses were more closed off, with slumped shoulders and a lowered head. The classifier was able to distinguish dominant from submissive poses with an average accuracy of approximately 75%, with 76.3% accuracy for dominant poses and 73.8% for submissive ones.

When applied to the natural postures from Study 1, the classifier confirmed that those classified as having dominant postures also scored higher on the antisocial personality traits identified in the first study. This finding reinforced the interpretation that habitual upright posture is associated with social dominance and hierarchy-related personality traits.

In the fourth study, the researchers aimed to explore the physiological underpinnings of the posture-personality relationship by measuring muscle activity in participants while assessing their natural posture. The study included 129 participants, and the researchers focused on two key neck muscles: the sternocleidomastoid (a muscle involved in head and neck movement) and the upper trapezius (which helps stabilize the shoulders and neck).

Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record muscle activity while participants were seated and at rest. This data was then correlated with the posture components identified in Study 1. Additionally, participants completed the same personality questionnaires as before, and their natural postures were again assessed using the photogrammetric approach.

The physiological measurements revealed that individuals with more upright postures showed increased muscle activity in the sternocleidomastoid, the neck muscle responsible for keeping the head elevated. However, there was no significant correlation between posture and the upper trapezius muscle activity. This suggests that the upright posture associated with dominant personality traits may be actively maintained through specific muscle engagement, particularly in the neck.

Importantly, the researchers also replicated the posture-personality relationship observed in earlier studies, confirming that individuals with more upright postures continued to score higher on dominance-related personality traits, even in an in-person setting.

For their final study, the researchers aimed to further explore the relationship between natural posture and personality traits by expanding the range of personality measures used. They recruited 125 participants. Participants were asked to take photos of their natural standing posture, and these images were analyzed using the same photogrammetric techniques as in earlier studies. In addition to the personality scales used in previous studies, this study included measures of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and aggression to explore a wider array of antisocial traits.

The findings showed that individuals with more erect postures scored higher on traits such as Machiavellianism, primary psychopathy, and hubristic pride, all of which relate to a desire for power and the use of manipulative or aggressive strategies to achieve social dominance. The results of Study 5 reinforced the idea that natural body posture reflects stable personality characteristics, particularly those related to dominance and hierarchy.

However, the researchers noted that “it is important to emphasize that our study is observational; that is, we observed a correlation between body posture and personality and therefore cannot make inferences about causality. In other words, people should NOT take away that standing upright will change your personality (for better or for worse).”

“One take-home message from our study is that body posture is not only important for physical health, but it also reflects (as mentioned, whether it plays a causal role or not remains to be determined) relevant aspects of our personality, particularly those related to social interactions. Thus, together with findings from studies on the psychological effects of transient body poses, it highlights the importance, and benefits, of paying attention to our bodies in our daily life.”

But as with any study, there are some limitations. The sample was predominantly drawn from a university setting in Canada. It remains unclear whether the same patterns would hold in a more diverse population, particularly among older adults or those from different cultural backgrounds. Future research should aim to replicate these findings in more varied populations to ensure their generalizability.

“The usual caveat in this kind of research is the sample—we studied young adults, most of whom were university students and the vast majority of whom self-identified as women,” Wainio-Theberge and Armony told PsyPost. “While we recently extended this to a wider age range (up to 80 years old), there’s a lot of variability in the population at large that we’re not capturing in this study.”

Additionally, while the researchers found a connection between posture and personality, their measurements focused primarily on postures related to dominance and submission. Future studies could explore whether other postural characteristics, such as slouching or leaning, are associated with different personality traits, such as introversion or anxiety.

“The long-term goal would be to extend this research to other aspects of personality,” the researchers said. “Body language is multifaceted and conveys lots of signals besides dominance and submission, so there’s no reason to expect that posture-personality relationships should be limited to this dimension. With more advanced methods, which we are currently developing, we might be able to pick up on other posture-personality relationships.”

The study, “Differences in natural standing posture are associated with antisocial and manipulative personality traits,” was authored by Soren Wainio-Theberge and Jorge L Armony.

RELATED

Your brain’s insulation might become emergency energy during a marathon
Dark Triad

Study uncovers shared and distinct brain network signatures of narcissistic and antisocial traits

August 21, 2025

New research highlights shared and distinct brain connectivity patterns linked to narcissistic and antisocial traits. Using resting-state fMRI and graph theory, the study found altered activity across key brain networks involved in self-reflection, emotion processing, and cognitive control.

Read moreDetails
People high in psychopathy and low in cognitive ability are the most politically active online, study finds
Political Psychology

People high in psychopathy and low in cognitive ability are the most politically active online, study finds

August 20, 2025

New research highlights a striking pattern: individuals with high psychopathic traits and lower cognitive ability tend to be the most politically active online. The study also links fear of missing out to digital engagement across eight diverse national contexts.

Read moreDetails
Dark personality traits flourish in these specific environments, huge new study reveals
Dark Triad

Dark personality traits flourish in these specific environments, huge new study reveals

August 17, 2025

Researchers have uncovered a connection between societal adversity and dark personality traits like callousness and manipulation. In places marked by corruption and violence, people were more likely to endorse self-serving behaviors—even when it meant harming others.

Read moreDetails
Positivity resonance predicts lasting love, according to new psychology research
Neuroimaging

New neuroscience research links psychopathy’s antisocial features to distinct brain structure abnormalities

August 15, 2025

Researchers used high-resolution brain imaging to investigate psychopathy’s neural basis, finding widespread structural differences in men with high psychopathy scores, particularly in frontal-subcortical circuits linked to impulse regulation, decision-making, and behavioral control.

Read moreDetails
Christians are more self-compassionate than atheists, but also more narcissistic
Narcissism

New study links celebrity worship to narcissism, materialism, and perceived similarity

August 14, 2025

People who strongly admire celebrities tend to score higher in materialism and vulnerable narcissism, according to a new study. The findings also suggest that feeling similar to a celebrity may play a key role in developing intense admiration.

Read moreDetails
His psychosis was a mystery—until doctors learned about ChatGPT’s health advice
Psychopathy

Female killers in Sweden show low psychopathy, primarily reactive motives

August 13, 2025

A nationwide Swedish study finds most women who commit lethal violence act in emotionally charged situations, with low psychopathy scores and little planning. Severe mental disorders were linked to a more complex blend of reactive and instrumental features.

Read moreDetails
People with narcissistic tendencies report more ostracism and are more often excluded
Narcissism

People with narcissistic tendencies report more ostracism and are more often excluded

August 10, 2025

A sweeping new study reveals that narcissistic traits—especially antagonistic rivalry—are linked to more frequent experiences of social exclusion, shaped by how narcissists perceive ambiguous interactions, how they behave toward others, and how exclusion can reinforce narcissism over time.

Read moreDetails
High sensitivity may protect against anomalous psychological phenomena
Psychopathy

Scientists have uncovered these weird facts about psychopathic individuals

August 7, 2025

Psychologists are learning that psychopathic traits can be subtle, widespread, and surprisingly influential. These 11 studies offer a science-backed glimpse into how callousness, impulsivity, and emotional detachment shape everything from romantic behavior to mortality risk and facial emotion processing.

Read moreDetails

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists find evidence of an internal brain rhythm that orchestrates memory

High-fat fructose diet linked to anxiety-like behavior via disrupted liver-brain communication

Study finds Trump and Harris used distinct rhetoric in 2024—but shared more similarities than expected

Evolution may have capped human brain size to balance energy costs and survival

Cannabidiol shows potential to reverse some neuropsychological effects of social stress

Top AI models fail spectacularly when faced with slightly altered medical questions

A new frontier in autism research: predicting risk in babies as young as two months

Cerebellar-prefrontal brain connectivity may shape negative symptoms in psychosis

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy