Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Mental Health Addiction

Brain differences in childhood predict substance use in later life, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
March 4, 2025
in Addiction, Neuroimaging
[Imagen 3]

[Imagen 3]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

A recent study published in JAMA Network Open has found that subtle differences in brain structure during late childhood are linked to whether young people start using substances like alcohol, nicotine, or cannabis in their early teens. Children who initiated substance use before the age of 15 tended to have slightly larger overall brain volumes and a thinner prefrontal cortex compared to their peers who did not use substances. Importantly, these brain characteristics were often detectable even before the young people had ever tried substances, suggesting they could be pre-existing factors that increase the likelihood of early substance use.

The widespread use of psychoactive substances and the serious problems that can arise from it, such as addiction and health issues, are a major concern for public health around the world. While the most severe consequences of substance use often become apparent in late adolescence or young adulthood, the path towards these problems frequently begins much earlier. It is well-established that starting to use substances at a young age is a strong predictor of developing substance use problems later in life. Therefore, understanding what puts some young people at risk of starting substance use early is a critical area of research.

Previous studies using brain imaging have shown that people with substance use problems often have differences in their brain structure compared to those without such problems. These differences have been observed as reductions in the amount of gray matter in the brain, a thinning of the outer layer of the brain called the cortex, and less integrity in the brain’s white matter, which is responsible for communication between brain regions.

While these brain changes are often seen across the entire brain, some areas, like the hippocampus (important for memory) and the prefrontal cortex (involved in decision-making and self-control), seem to be particularly affected. However, much of this previous research has looked at brain structure in people who already have substance use problems. This makes it difficult to determine whether these brain differences are a result of substance use itself, or if they were present beforehand.

Some research has started to suggest that these brain differences may not just be caused by substance use, but could also be pre-existing risk factors. For example, studies following children over time have found that children with smaller brain volumes and a thinner prefrontal cortex are more likely to start using alcohol later in adolescence. Furthermore, studies of families have shown that even children who do not drink heavily, but have siblings or parents with alcohol problems, also tend to have similar brain structure differences.

These findings suggest that brain structure might play a role in making some individuals more susceptible to substance use, possibly due to a combination of genetic predispositions and environmental influences. This idea aligns with broader theories about addiction, which propose that brain biology can be both a cause and a consequence of substance use. Developmental theories also highlight that the way the brain develops during adolescence, with an imbalance between emotional drive and cognitive control, might contribute to a greater vulnerability to substance use during this period.

To explore this further, researchers analyzed data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. This large, ongoing study is following the development of over ten thousand children across the United States from childhood into young adulthood. The researchers wanted to see if differences in brain structure, measured when the children were around 9 or 10 years old and had not yet started using substances, could predict whether they would begin using substances in the following years. Specifically, they wanted to know if brain variations present in late childhood were associated with starting to use substances before the age of 15.

“A lot of existing research on brain structure associations with substance involvement has focused on the effect of substance use on the brain, typically in the context of substance use disorders, rather than the brain on substance use,” explained study author Alex P. Miller, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Indiana University School of Medicine, who conducted the research while a postdoctoral fellow at Washington University School of Medicine working with Arpana Agrawal and Ryan Bogdan.

“This study provided the opportunity to investigate this latter possibility and examine whether pre-existing brain structure differences in late childhood were associated with early substance use initiation in early adolescence in a large sample well-designed to examine this question.”

The researchers used data from nearly 10,000 children participating in the ABCD study. These children were initially between 9 and 11 years old when they joined the study. As part of the ABCD study, the children underwent brain scans using magnetic resonance imaging, a technique that provides detailed pictures of the brain’s structure. These scans were performed at the beginning of the study. The children and their parents also participated in regular interviews, both in person and over the phone, over the next three years. During these interviews, they were asked whether they had ever used alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, or other illicit substances.

The researchers defined “substance use initiation” as having used any of these substances at any point during the three-year follow-up period. They focused on early initiation, specifically before the age of 15. They considered the use of alcohol, nicotine, and cannabis separately, as well as any substance use in general. It is important to note that they excluded instances of alcohol or nicotine use that were solely within religious ceremonies, focusing on use in other contexts. Children who reported using any substance during this period were categorized as “initiators,” while those who reported no substance use were considered “non-initiators.”

From the brain scans, the researchers measured a wide range of brain structure features. These included overall measures like the total volume of the whole brain, the volume of the cortex, the volume of subcortical gray matter, the total surface area of the cortex, and the average thickness of the cortex. They also measured the volumes of specific subcortical structures, such as the hippocampus, amygdala, and caudate. Furthermore, they analyzed the volume, thickness, surface area, and depth of folds in 34 different regions of the cortex in both hemispheres of the brain. In total, they examined nearly 300 different brain structure measurements.

To analyze the data, the researchers used statistical methods to compare the brain measurements of children who initiated substance use with those who did not. They took into account factors that could influence brain development and substance use, such as the child’s age, sex, stage of puberty, whether they were a twin or sibling in the study, and the type of magnetic resonance imaging scanner used for their brain scan. By controlling for these factors, the researchers could isolate the relationship between brain structure and substance use initiation more clearly.

The study’s findings revealed several significant associations between brain structure and early substance use initiation. Children who went on to initiate substance use before age 15 showed, on average, larger overall brain volumes, including larger total brain volume, cortical volume, subcortical volume, and cortical surface area. Regionally, they found that those who initiated substance use had a thinner cortex in a specific area of the prefrontal cortex, called the right rostral middle frontal gyrus. However, in other regions of the brain, specifically in the temporal, occipital, and parietal lobes, they observed a thicker cortex in the substance-using group.

When they looked at specific substances, they found that alcohol use initiation largely mirrored the findings for any substance use, which is not surprising given that alcohol was the most commonly used substance in this age group. They found similar associations between larger brain volumes and thinner prefrontal cortex with alcohol initiation. Nicotine and cannabis use initiation showed some unique associations with brain structure as well, but these were less consistent and did not hold up to the strictest statistical tests applied in the study.

“The findings of the study suggest that early adolescent substance use is associated with differences in brain structure measured in late childhood and that some of this brain structure variability precedes initiation,” Miller told PsyPost. “Variability in brain structure may partially reflect predispositional risk for initiating substance use earlier in life which is, in turn, associated with greater risk of developing a substance use disorder later in life.”

“The fact that there are associations between brain structure and early substance use, some of which preceded substance exposure, to me, was not as surprising as the particular pattern of results. Namely, that substance use initiation was associated with larger global brain metrics, while later stages of substance involvement (substance use disorders) are typically associated with smaller global brain metrics.”

“Similarly, thinner prefrontal cortex being associated with early substance use initiation was largely consistent with our hypotheses and prior research; however, that this was paired with thicker cortical regions elsewhere was unexpected and suggests a possible pattern of differential brain development that will be interesting to follow up on in future studies.”

To ensure their findings were robust, the researchers conducted additional analyses. They repeated their analyses, excluding children who had already used substances before the baseline brain scan, to focus on brain features present before substance use began. The results remained largely consistent, suggesting that the observed brain structure differences were indeed present before substance use began for most of these children. They also considered the potential influence of prenatal substance exposure but found that this did not change their main findings.

But as with all research, there are some caveats. “Recent research suggests that many brain-behavior associations may be characterized by relatively small effects,” Miller noted. “Given the small effect sizes we are seeing and the level of exposure studied being the very earliest forms of substance involvement, the results of our study are not clinically meaningful or predictive of individual outcomes for substance use disorder treatment.”

“However, these findings do inform, and to some extent, challenge current theoretical models of addiction. As researchers continue to follow participants of the ABCD Study over time, the hope is that we will continue to learn more about how brain structure and brain activity influences and is influenced by substance use in ways that will someday improve precision healthcare approaches.”

“We are currently examining the degree to which these brain structure differences related to early substance use initiation might themselves be influenced by differences in both environmental and genetic factors as well as to what extent brain structure correlates of early substance use initiation might overlap with those related to impulsive personality traits,” Miller added.

The study, “Neuroanatomical Variability and Substance Use Initiation in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence,” was authored by Alex P. Miller, David A. A. Baranger, Sarah E. Paul, Hugh Garavan, Scott Mackey, Susan F. Tapert, Kimberly H. LeBlanc, Arpana Agrawal, and Ryan Bogdan.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Caffeine use prevents stress-induced impairment of spatial memory
Caffeine

Caffeine may help prevent depression-like symptoms by protecting the gut-brain connection

July 15, 2025

Caffeine may help prevent stress-induced depression-like symptoms in mice by protecting gut health and reducing inflammation. While more research is needed, the findings raise the possibility that everyday dietary habits could play a meaningful role in mental health

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists identify new gut-brain circuits linked to sugar and fat cravings
Neuroimaging

Researchers identify a shared brain pattern behind feeling surprised

July 13, 2025

New research reveals that the human brain responds to surprise in a remarkably consistent way, whether it’s during a learning task, watching basketball, or viewing animated cartoons. A newly developed brain network model accurately tracked belief-violating moments across all scenarios.

Read moreDetails
Pills spilling out of a bottle on a table
ADHD

Methylphenidate: ADHD drug curbs impulsivity in men only, linked to brain wiring differences

July 13, 2025

Researchers found that methylphenidate lowers impulsive choice behavior in men but not women. The effect was associated with the structural integrity of specific white matter tracts in the brain, highlighting potential sex-based differences in drug response.

Read moreDetails
Scientists discover that brain region acts like an “anxiety meter,” scaling activity to match threat level
Neuroimaging

Neuroscientists identify brain pathway that prioritizes safety over other needs

July 12, 2025

Researchers identified a brain circuit in mice that triggers safety-seeking movement, overriding drives like hunger and social interaction. This lateral hypothalamus to brainstem pathway activates context-dependent locomotion toward shelter in response to internal or external threat cues.

Read moreDetails
A surprising body part might provide key insights into schizophrenia risk
Addiction

Neuroscientists shed new light on how heroin disrupts prefrontal brain function

July 11, 2025

After heroin exposure and abstinence, mice showed reduced prefrontal brain activity during social interaction but heightened responses to drug-related cues, suggesting heroin disrupts normal brain function in ways that may contribute to social withdrawal and relapse risk.

Read moreDetails
A common vegetable may counteract brain changes linked to obesity
Mental Health

A common vegetable may counteract brain changes linked to obesity

July 11, 2025

Could a humble vegetable protect the brain from the effects of early-life overfeeding? A new rat study finds that okra improves insulin sensitivity and reduces inflammation in key brain areas linked to appetite and obesity.

Read moreDetails
Hyperarousal peaks in the morning for insomniacs
Neuroimaging

Dysfunction within the sensory processing cortex of the brain is associated with insomnia, study finds

July 9, 2025

New brain imaging research suggests that insomnia is linked to abnormal connectivity in brain regions that process sensory information. These disruptions may play a role in the sleep-wake imbalance that makes it so hard for some people to rest.

Read moreDetails
Even in healthy adults, high blood sugar levels are linked to impaired brain function
Memory

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

July 8, 2025

New neuroscience research shows how the brain decides which memories deserve more attention. By tracking brain activity, scientists found that the frontal cortex helps direct limited memory resources, allowing people to remember high-priority information more precisely than less relevant details.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

Childhood maltreatment linked to emotion regulation difficulties and teen mental health problems

Caffeine may help prevent depression-like symptoms by protecting the gut-brain connection

Secret changes to major U.S. health datasets raise alarms

Moral outrage spreads petitions online—but doesn’t always inspire people to sign them

The triglyceride-glucose index: Can it predict depression risk in the elderly?

People with ADHD exhibit altered brain activity before making high-stakes choices

Narcissistic individuals are more prone to maladaptive daydreaming

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy