Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists show children’s brains function differently during book reading and screen time

by Eric W. Dolan
April 26, 2025
in Cognitive Science, Developmental Psychology, Neuroimaging
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

A new study published in Developmental Science has found that preschool children’s brain activity differs when they are read to from a book compared to when they view and listen to stories on a screen. Using a neuroimaging technique called functional near-infrared spectroscopy, the researchers observed greater activation in the right hemisphere of the brain during live book reading, particularly in regions involved in social understanding, while screen time produced more balanced activity across both hemispheres.

Reading to young children plays an important role in supporting language development and brain growth. Book reading offers opportunities for children to hear rich language, learn the structure of stories, build vocabulary, and engage in social interaction with caregivers. In contrast, growing concerns have emerged about the effects of screen time, as many studies link high screen exposure to language delays and weaker connections in brain areas important for literacy.

While past research has demonstrated broad differences between book reading and screen media in children’s outcomes, fewer studies have directly compared what happens in the brain during these two activities. The researchers aimed to fill this gap by measuring brain activity during live reading and screen-based storytelling in preschoolers.

The study involved 28 typically developing children between the ages of 3 and 6 years old. All participants came from predominantly English-speaking households, although some were multilingual. The children listened to two different stories: one presented during a live book reading session, and the other delivered as an audio recording paired with images on a screen. In the book reading condition, a live experimenter sat beside the child, reading aloud from a printed book.

In the screen time condition, the child viewed the story on a computer while hearing a recorded voice. Both stories were carefully matched for length, vocabulary, and content. Brain activity was recorded throughout using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, which measures changes in blood oxygenation linked to neural activity.

The researchers focused on specific brain regions involved in language, narrative understanding, and social cognition, including the inferior and middle frontal gyri, the superior and middle temporal gyri, and the temporal parietal junction. The team analyzed differences in activation across left and right hemispheres during each condition.

Results showed that live book reading produced greater activation in the right temporal parietal junction, a brain area associated with social processes like joint attention and understanding others’ thoughts. Activation in this area was significant during the book reading condition but not during the screen time condition. Across the broader regions of interest, brain responses during book reading were stronger in the right hemisphere than in the left, suggesting a right-lateralized pattern. In contrast, brain responses during screen time were relatively even across both hemispheres, showing no strong lateralization.

The findings suggest that live book reading may engage preschool children in more socially oriented cognitive processes compared to solitary screen time. Book reading may encourage children to focus on the reader’s emotions, intentions, and shared attention toward the book, all of which involve right-hemisphere brain networks. In contrast, screen-based storytelling might involve more isolated language processing, relying less on social engagement.

While these patterns are consistent with previous research showing that book reading benefits language and social development, the study also highlights important nuances. For example, the right-lateralized response during live reading might reflect children’s sensitivity to the human voice, facial expressions, and social interaction, even if the reading interaction itself was somewhat scripted and controlled in this study.

As with any study, there are limitations. The relatively small sample size, particularly when accounting for missing data in some brain channels, limits the strength of the conclusions. Many of the children also came from highly educated and high-income households, so the findings may not generalize to more diverse populations.

The researchers also noted that the structured nature of the book reading task—designed to minimize variation across participants—reduced the natural, conversational aspects of typical reading interactions between parents and children. Future studies could examine brain activity during more naturalistic reading sessions that include back-and-forth conversation and emotional expression.

In addition, although the study showed different patterns of brain activation between book reading and screen time, it did not directly measure children’s language learning outcomes. Future research could explore whether these neural differences are linked to improvements in vocabulary, comprehension, or later academic skills.

Despite these limitations, the study adds important new evidence to the understanding of how different early experiences shape brain function. It reinforces previous findings that social interaction during language exposure matters for young children’s brain development. Live, shared activities like book reading seem to recruit brain systems involved in understanding others and processing complex social cues, which could give children a stronger foundation for later communication and learning.

The results also suggest that screen-based media might not activate the same social brain systems, especially when the child is passively viewing without a live social partner. While not all screen time is equal, and some interactive or educational media may still be beneficial, the findings support recommendations that live social interaction remains important during early childhood.

The study, “Do Children’s Brains Function Differently During Book Reading and Screen Time? A fNIRS Study,” was authored by Meredith Pecukonis, Meryem Yücel, Henry Lee, Cory Knox, David A. Boas, and Helen Tager-Flusberg.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin3ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Poor sleep may shrink brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer’s disease, study suggests
Memory

Neuroscientists discover biological mechanism that helps the brain ignore irrelevant information

June 14, 2025

New research suggests the brain uses a learning rule at inhibitory synapses to block out distractions during memory replay. This process enables the hippocampus to prioritize useful patterns over random noise, helping build more generalizable and reliable memories.

Read moreDetails
Psilocybin appears to have a uniquely powerful relationship with nature relatedness
Neuroimaging

Psilocybin induces large-scale brain network reorganization, offering insights into the psychedelic state

June 14, 2025

A new study using high-resolution EEG reveals that psilocybin dramatically alters brain connectivity in rats. The psychedelic induced dose-dependent changes in network organization, disrupting normal patterns of neural communication and suggesting rodents may be viable models for studying altered consciousness.

Read moreDetails
Brain boost from pecans? New study finds short-term cognitive benefits
Attachment Styles

Parental conflict may shape how mothers discipline their children

June 12, 2025

A new study shows that when mothers experience hostile conflict with their partner, they may feel less emotionally secure—an effect that predicts harsher discipline toward their children. Fathers showed no similar pattern in parenting behavior.

Read moreDetails
Brain boost from pecans? New study finds short-term cognitive benefits
Developmental Psychology

Moral self-concept in kindergarten predicts better social skills in early school years, study finds

June 12, 2025

Children who see themselves as moral tend to develop stronger social-emotional skills, and vice versa, according to new research in Cognition & Emotion that followed 500 children through the transition from kindergarten to first grade.

Read moreDetails
Brain boost from pecans? New study finds short-term cognitive benefits
Cognitive Science

Brain boost from pecans? New study finds short-term cognitive benefits

June 12, 2025

A new study published in Nutritional Neuroscience found that a pecan-enriched shake improved memory and attention in healthy young adults. Participants performed better on 8 of 23 cognitive tests after consuming pecans compared to a calorie-matched shake.

Read moreDetails
Adversity in childhood linked to accelerated brain development
Early Life Adversity and Childhood Maltreatment

Adversity in childhood linked to accelerated brain development

June 12, 2025

New research using data from over 7,000 children suggests that adversity during late childhood accelerates brain network development. While these changes may buffer against anxiety and depression, they are also associated with poorer school performance.

Read moreDetails
Democrats dislike Republicans more than Republicans dislike Democrats, studies find
Cognitive Science

New neuroscience study reveals sex-specific brain responses to threat

June 11, 2025

A new study shows that male and female mice engage distinct brain circuits when responding to threat, challenging the assumption that similar behavior reflects identical brain function. The findings highlight the need for sex-inclusive neuroscience research.

Read moreDetails
HIIT workouts outshine others in boosting memory and brain health, new study finds
Cognitive Science

Mega-study shows exercise boosts cognitive functioning across all ages and health conditions

June 11, 2025

From children to older adults, exercise enhances brainpower. A sweeping new analysis shows that physical activity improves general cognition, memory, and executive function in both healthy and clinical populations, reinforcing its value for mental sharpness at any age.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Low-carb diets linked to reduced depression symptoms — but there’s a catch

Neuroscientists discover biological mechanism that helps the brain ignore irrelevant information

Problematic porn use remains stable over time and is strongly linked to mental distress, study finds

Christian nationalists tend to imagine God as benevolent, angry over sins, and engaged

Psilocybin induces large-scale brain network reorganization, offering insights into the psychedelic state

Scientists map how alcohol changes bodily sensations

Poor sleep may shrink brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer’s disease, study suggests

Narcissists perceive inequity because they overestimate their contributions, study suggests

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy