Adolescents who grow up in negative social environments – characterized by hostility, neglect, and competition – may develop psychopathic traits as a form of adaptation to obtain socially valued outcomes, such as popularity and dating success, according to new research published in Development and Psychopathology. This suggests that the behaviors often associated with psychopathy, such as manipulation and a lack of empathy, might in some contexts serve as a strategy for adolescents to navigate and succeed in challenging social landscapes.
Psychopathic personality traits are characterized by a blend of interpersonal, affective, and behavioral dimensions. These traits include manipulation, grandiosity, callousness, unemotionality, impulsivity, and sensation-seeking. Individuals exhibiting high levels of psychopathic traits may show a superficial charm, a lack of empathy or remorse, and a willingness to exploit others for personal gain.
Psychopathy should not be confused with Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), although the two are related. ASPD is a diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), primarily characterized by a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others. While there is an overlap, not all individuals with ASPD have psychopathic traits, and vice versa. Psychopathy encompasses a broader range of traits and is a spectrum, with individuals displaying these characteristics to varying degrees.
“Psychopathy is associated with many negative outcomes such as incarceration, early mortality, and economic problems. But these negative outcomes should be viewed in the context of the environments where psychopathy develops,” said study author Kristopher Brazil, a postdoctoral researcher at Carleton University.
“For instance, psychopathy is often found in environments with higher levels of adversity, including competitiveness, neglect, parental hostility and low warmth, and neighborhood violence, among other things. Further, these adverse environments may change the calculus around what is acceptable behavior to achieve one’s goals and acquire valuable and desired resources, such as social dominance in one’s peer group and dating partners.”
“Thus, characteristics of psychopathy (e.g., callousness, manipulativeness, sensation seeking) may be a response to adverse environments that results in the acquisition of positive social outcomes (e.g., dating, social dominance) as well as the negative outcomes (e.g., incarceration, early mortality). Our study aimed to test the more ‘positive’ side of this idea in a sample of adolescents.”
The study included 396 adolescents, including 230 girls, with an average age of 14.64 years. These young individuals were recruited from a diverse array of extracurricular activities, such as sports teams, youth groups, and dance groups across several medium-sized cities in Southern Ontario, Canada. The participants completed a series of online questionnaires, designed to assess their personal perceptions of their environments, psychopathic traits, and social outcomes.
Brazil and his colleagues found significant associations between adverse environmental factors — such as parental neglect, school social competition, and neighborhood violence — and higher levels of psychopathic traits among adolescents. In other words, youths who perceive their environments as hostile or competitive are more likely to report characteristics associated with psychopathy, such as impulsivity, callousness, and grandiosity. These findings align with the hypothesis that psychopathic traits may develop as a coping mechanism or adaptive response to navigate challenging social landscapes.
However, not all aspects of perceived environmental adversity were directly linked to psychopathic traits. For instance, family socioeconomic status (SES) did not show a direct association with psychopathic traits, indicating that the pathways between environmental factors and psychopathic behaviors might be nuanced and variable.
Importantly, the researchers also found that psychopathic traits were positively related to socially adaptive outcomes, notably social power and dating behavior. Adolescents displaying higher levels of psychopathic traits reported greater success in obtaining social influence and more active dating lives. This indicates that, within the context of their environments, these traits may offer a strategic advantage in achieving desired social goals. These indirect pathways were robust across different facets of psychopathy, such as impulsivity, callous-unemotional traits, and narcissism.
“Two observations are important to take away from this study,” Brazil told PsyPost. “First, youth who are higher in traits of psychopathy (e.g., lacking remorse, having a big ego, being reckless) seem to come from more challenging home, school, and neighborhood environments.”
“Second, youth who are higher in psychopathy do not just acquire negative outcomes like jail time and poor school performance as shown in previous research, they also seem to acquire outcomes that are desirable to adolescents, such as dominance among peers and dating opportunities. Together, these points suggest that psychopathy in adolescence may involve turning adversity into an advantage for themselves.”
Despite these significant insights, the study has its limitations, including its cross-sectional design, reliance on self-reported data, and the focus on a relatively homogenous demographic group. These constraints highlight the need for further research, particularly longitudinal and experimental studies, to better understand the causal relationships and the potential for these findings to generalize across different populations.
The findings are in line with previous work by Brazil and his colleagues, which has linked psychopathy to increased mating success. Research has also found that that adolescent boys with psychopathic traits may gain dating success through heightened delinquency, suggesting an evolutionary benefit to these traits.
“It’s important not to have the positive and individually self-serving outcomes that we found in our research overshadow the negative outcomes that psychopathy creates for adolescents themselves and society,” Brazil added. “The traits are inherently destructive and self-serving, which results in clear costs at the social and collective level.”
“The negative outcomes are very real for those with psychopathy too. For instance, who wants to die young? Who wants to spend most of their lives in prison? Nevertheless, we make do with what we have, and an important point that our research hopefully will communicate is that the positive outcomes that these traits may sometimes provide to adolescents are an important part of the developmental calculus and they should be viewed in the context of what these youth experience (e.g., competitive school atmosphere, poorly connected home life).”
“Interventions for these youth could be made more sensitive to the positive social outcomes that adolescents may acquire who have these traits and target the adverse social issues that may be influencing their development in the first place,” Brazil concluded.
The study, “Adolescent psychopathic traits and adverse environments: Associations with socially adaptive outcomes,” was authored by Kristopher J. Brazil, Ann H. Farrell, Abby Boer, and Anthony A. Volk.
