PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Does practice really make perfect?

by Rice University
July 16, 2014
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Does practice really make perfect? It’s an age-old question, and a new study from Rice University, Princeton University and Michigan State University finds that while practice won’t make you perfect, it will usually make you better at what you’re practicing.

“This question is the subject of a long-running debate in psychology,” said Fred Oswald, professor and chair of psychology at Rice and one of the study’s co-authors. “Why do so few people who are involved in sports such as golf, musical instruments such as the violin or careers such as law or medicine ever reach an expert level of performance?”

The study, “Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education and Professions: A Meta-Analysis,” reviewed 88 previous studies (more than 11,135 total participants) published through 2014 that investigated relevant research on practice predicting performance in music, games, sports, educational and occupational domains.

Within each domain, the researchers averaged the reported results across all relevant studies. They found that “deliberate practice” – defined as engagement in structured activities created specifically to improve performance in a specific field – explained 26 percent of the variance in performance for games, 21 percent for music, 18 percent for sports, 4 percent for education and less than 1 percent for professions.

“Deliberate practice was a strong overall predictor of success in many performance domains, and not surprisingly, people who report practicing a lot generally tend to perform at a higher level than people who practice less,” Oswald said. “However, perhaps the more important contribution of our study is that no matter how strongly practice predicted performance in our findings, there was always statistical room for other personal factors to predict learning a skill and performing successfully, including basic abilities.”

Oswald noted that significant amounts of research have already identified basic abilities as also being important to predicting performance, but some researchers tend to minimize them and consider practice as the sole determinant of performance.

The researchers conclude that while practice will not make perfect for all people, it will make almost everyone better.

“Other factors matter as well, but even so, no one says that practice will ever hurt you; but be careful if you are walking tightropes,” Oswald said.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Specific cognitive skills rival general intelligence in predicting socioeconomic success
  • Mapping the dark triad: Which countries have the most narcissistic and manipulative populations?
  • Fascinating findings emerge from recent LSD research
  • Study finds unpredictable childhood environments are linked to borderline personality traits in adulthood
  • Is intelligence related to happiness?

Science of Money

  • New study blames authoritarian bosses for the quiet quitting trend
  • Three types of older jobseekers, three very different odds of getting hired
  • Can AI read the market’s mood? Researchers test DeepSeek sentiment scores against Shanghai stock returns
  • Do glowing words really sell? An economist finds a small but real puffery effect on Airbnb
  • Error tolerance: entrepreneurship booster or societal risk?

Recent

  • Tiny vesicles in breast milk carry stress signals to the infant brain
  • Scientists discover how boosting a protective protein stops toxic tau spread in the brain
  • Internal expectations, not actual posts, drive how narcissists view their social media success
  • Female biology professors are now more likely to have a Wikipedia page than their male peers
  • Artificial intelligence reveals subtle movement differences in autistic toddlers
  • Adults with depression show a negative attentional bias, but new research suggests it is highly task-specific
  • Physically compressing peoples’ torsos reduces the riskiness of their decisions, study finds
  • The surprising disconnect between intense romance and a couple’s sex life
  • Does going to religious services actually improve your mental health?
  • Specific cognitive skills rival general intelligence in predicting socioeconomic success

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc