PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Does practice really make perfect?

by Rice University
July 16, 2014
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Does practice really make perfect? It’s an age-old question, and a new study from Rice University, Princeton University and Michigan State University finds that while practice won’t make you perfect, it will usually make you better at what you’re practicing.

“This question is the subject of a long-running debate in psychology,” said Fred Oswald, professor and chair of psychology at Rice and one of the study’s co-authors. “Why do so few people who are involved in sports such as golf, musical instruments such as the violin or careers such as law or medicine ever reach an expert level of performance?”

The study, “Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education and Professions: A Meta-Analysis,” reviewed 88 previous studies (more than 11,135 total participants) published through 2014 that investigated relevant research on practice predicting performance in music, games, sports, educational and occupational domains.

Within each domain, the researchers averaged the reported results across all relevant studies. They found that “deliberate practice” – defined as engagement in structured activities created specifically to improve performance in a specific field – explained 26 percent of the variance in performance for games, 21 percent for music, 18 percent for sports, 4 percent for education and less than 1 percent for professions.

“Deliberate practice was a strong overall predictor of success in many performance domains, and not surprisingly, people who report practicing a lot generally tend to perform at a higher level than people who practice less,” Oswald said. “However, perhaps the more important contribution of our study is that no matter how strongly practice predicted performance in our findings, there was always statistical room for other personal factors to predict learning a skill and performing successfully, including basic abilities.”

Oswald noted that significant amounts of research have already identified basic abilities as also being important to predicting performance, but some researchers tend to minimize them and consider practice as the sole determinant of performance.

The researchers conclude that while practice will not make perfect for all people, it will make almost everyone better.

“Other factors matter as well, but even so, no one says that practice will ever hurt you; but be careful if you are walking tightropes,” Oswald said.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Kids’ aggression appears to shape parents’ discipline more than the reverse, study finds
  • One in three teen boys follows Andrew Tate at least a little, and those who do hold more rigid views of manhood
  • Neuroscientists uncover brain clues to why some people with childhood trauma struggle to look forward to things
  • College students who use more cannabis are less willing to share it, and less likely to use it with friends
  • How chronic drinking masks the brain’s hidden scars from childhood trauma

Science of Money

  • How a boss’s psychopathic traits shape employee performance
  • Study finds Medicaid expansions prompted lenders to ease borrowing terms
  • Does remote work increase birth rates? Census data points to the opposite
  • France cut the workweek to 35 hours to boost hiring, but new research suggests it failed
  • The hidden psychology behind pro-company misconduct

Recent

  • Young adults who fear rejection also tend to fear death more, psychology study finds
  • How the menstrual cycle might alter ADHD symptoms in women taking stimulant medication
  • Anger and fear nudge voters toward different kinds of leader faces, study suggests
  • Dominance-seeking workers see more sexual interest in coworkers’ behavior, and that may help explain harassment
  • Neuroscientists are digging into a worrying link between polluted air and children’s brain wiring
  • Romantic breakups correspond with changes in sexual identity during adulthood
  • Your body makes its own cannabis-like chemicals as you run, and neuroscience research finds they keep rising all the way to the marathon finish line, a possible clue to the runner’s high
  • People with psychosis and a history of aggression are more likely to mistake negative emotions for positive ones
  • Expecting to lose economic standing hurts well-being more than expecting to gain helps it
  • Breast reduction surgery is linked to improved sexual function

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc