Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Religious fundamentalism could be associated with increased sensitivity to errors

by Eric W. Dolan
April 30, 2018
in Cognitive Science, Psychology of Religion
(Photo credit: Subbotina Anna)

(Photo credit: Subbotina Anna)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

Scientists are beginning to investigate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and cognitive processes. A new preliminary study published in Frontiers in Psychology hints that religious fundamentalism is associated with more intense processing of error-related stimuli.

“My research interests are focused on motivational processes underlying social knowledge formation and usage. Specifically, I am studying why people become closed-minded and dogmatic,” said Malgorzata Kossowska, a professor in the Institute of Psychology at the Jagiellonian University and the corresponding author of the study.

“Closed-mindedness and dogmatism have important behavioral consequences such as prejudice, intolerance, injustice, and inequality. Religious fundamentalism is a very good example of closed minded, dogmatic beliefs. Besides, in Poland, where I am doing my research, almost everybody is religious, and nowadays most of them are religious fundamentalists. Thus, understanding closed-minded religious beliefs allowed me to better understand social processes in my country.”

“In this particular piece we focused on the general sensitivity to error-related events as an important mechanism through which fundamentalism facilitates self-control,” Kossowska told PsyPost. “We observed this mechanism in brain activity. I believe that this approach allows for the integration of multiple levels of analysis and therefore refines and constrains psychological theories.”

The researchers used electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the brain activity of 34 participants while they completed a Stroop task. During the task, the participants identified the color of various words related to error and uncertainty flashed on a screen.

The researchers were particularly interested in the N400 response, a pattern of electrical brain activity that is associated with the processing of unexpected or inappropriate information.

Kossowska and her colleagues observed significantly larger error-related brain activity among fundamentalist participants who were intolerant of uncertainty, but not among participants who were tolerant of uncertainty. In other words, for people who are intolerant of uncertainty, religious fundamentalism is associated with an increased N400 response on error-related words.

“Our results are in line with the claim that religion acts like a meaning system that offers order and control, protecting people against anxiety and subjective pain of errors when faced with uncertainty,” Kossowska explained.

“More specifically, we found that increased sensitivity to error-related words may be considered as a defensive mechanism of religious fundamentalists. Detecting errors may allow one to bring their behavior in line with fundamentalist rules and standards.”

However, the study has important limitations and there is need for further research.

“There are many major caveats. The study shows a correlation between religious fundamentalism and response-related brain activity; however, the causal direction of this relationship is unclear,” Kossowska said.

“Further research is needed to determine whether a fundamentalist mindset causes overactive performance monitoring or, on the contrary, excessive behavioral monitoring leads to religious fundamentalism. In addition, fundamentalism was studied on quite a homogeneous sample of young Polish Catholics. Thus, studying this effect across religions and cultures will likely yield valuable insights.”

“Next, although small, low-powered studies are endemic in neuroscience, they are also problematic,” Kossowska added. “It was recently recognized that low sample size of studies, small effects or both, lead to low statistical power that negatively affects the probability that a nominally statistically significant finding actually reflects a true effect. Therefore, the results should be treated with some caution and replications of the results would be of great value.”

The study, “Religious Fundamentalism Modulates Neural Responses to Error-Related Words: The Role of Motivation Toward Closure“, was authored by Małgorzata Kossowska, Paulina Szwed, Miroslaw Wyczesany, Gabriela Czarnek and Eligiusz Wronka.

RELATED

Evolutionary psychology reveals patterns in mass murder motivations across life stages
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists can now predict what color you’re seeing. The secret is surprisingly black and white.

October 17, 2025
New research reveals the double-edge sword of transformative spiritual experiences
Mental Health

New research reveals the double-edge sword of transformative spiritual experiences

October 16, 2025
Stunned woman refusing bread at the table, rejecting food in a grocery store or restaurant setting.
Cognitive Science

The nocebo effect, not gluten, may trigger symptoms for many with IBS

October 15, 2025
Cannabidiol may ease Alzheimer’s-related brain inflammation and improve cognition
Addiction

Lower IQ in youth predicts higher alcoholism risk in adulthood

October 14, 2025
Futuristic digital illustration of a human brain with interconnected neural pathways highlighted in vibrant neon blue and pink colors, symbolizing advanced neuroscience, brain connectivity, and cognitive science.
Cognitive Science

This happens in your brain when you change your mind, according to neuroscience

October 13, 2025
Children in classroom raising hands to answer teacher's question.
Cognitive Science

Major IQ differences in identical twins linked to schooling, challenging decades of research

October 11, 2025
Silicone breast implants being examined by a healthcare professional in a clinical setting.
Cognitive Science

Do breast implants alter neuromuscular control?

October 10, 2025
Do chatbots fill a social void? Research examines their role for lonely teens
Artificial Intelligence

An AI chatbot’s feedback style can alter your brain activity during learning

October 9, 2025

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New study reveals how the brain learns to adapt to harmless threats

Do pets really make us happier? The science is complicated

People with attachment anxiety are more vulnerable to problematic AI use

Psychedelic experiences linked to reduced cannabis use and greater psychological flexibility

How a single detail about Trump radically changes partisan views on immigration

Neuroscientists can now predict what color you’re seeing. The secret is surprisingly black and white.

Income inequality appears to shape children’s brain development

In later life, a partner’s happiness is closely linked to your own, study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy