Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Psychopharmacology

Research reveals why ‘smart drugs’ can impair memory and cognitive performance

by The Conversation
July 22, 2016
in Psychopharmacology
(Photo credit: pitju/Fotolia)

(Photo credit: pitju/Fotolia)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

It is an open secret: while athletes dope their bodies, regular office workers dope their brains. They buy prescription drugs such as Ritalin or Provigil on the internet’s flourishing black market to boost their cognitive performance.

It is hard to get reliable data on how many people take such “smart drugs” or “pharmacological cognitive enhancement substances”, as scientists call them. Prevalence studies and surveys suggest, though, that people from different walks of life use them, such as researchers, surgeons, and students. In an informal poll among readers of the journal Nature, 20% reported that they had taken smart drugs. And it seems that their use is on the rise.

So, if you are in a demanding and competitive job, some of your colleagues probably take smart drugs. Does this thought worry you? If so, you are not alone. Studies consistently find that people see brain doping negatively.

A main concern is fairness. Imagine that while you are going for a run to boost your mental energy, your colleague is popping Ritalin instead. While you believe in your afternoon nap to regain concentration, your office mate relies on Provigil. Unfair? The general public thinks that taking smart drugs is cheating, because it can give users a competitive edge. In fact, even several academics have argued that brain doping is unfair towards people who don’t do it.

Mixed effects

So, if your colleague gets a better performance report than you do, is it really because of the Ritalin she takes? If your office mate has more creative ideas, is it because of Provigil? Probably not. The smart drugs currently available can boost brain performance, yet they are not as effective as glaring media reports often suggest. In fact, research shows that while they can help some people achieve better, they can actually make others perform less well than they normally would. Let’s look at two prominent smart drugs, methylphenidate and modafinil, and their effects.

Methylphenidate, best-known under its brand name Ritalin, is a psychostimulant that increases the concentration of the neurotransmitters dopamine and norepinephrine in the brain. Methylphenidate is usually prescribed to people who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Indeed, this drug can have positive effects on memory performance. However, if methylphenidate can help with other important areas of cognitive performance, for example attention and learning, isn’t clear yet. Importantly, people who normally do not perform that well benefit more from taking it than people who are “natural” high performers. Methylphenidate can even reduce the brain power of high performers, by weakening their short-term memory, for example.

Modafinil, sold under names including Provigil or Alertec, is a wakefulness-promoting drug. Although its effects on the brain are not fully understood yet, modafinil works in part by increasing dopamine concentration. It has been developed to treat sleep disorders such as narcolepsy. Taking modafinil does improve attention, but it is still unclear whether it also brings any other cognitive benefits. If it does, they are likely to be small.

But modafinil might also make you less smart: it can reduce creativity and flexibility in thinking. Also, similar to methylphenidate, modafinil boosts brain power more for people who normally show low performance. In other words, if you take modafinil you might make your performance better in one domain, but reduce it in another. And you will hardly benefit if you are a high performer anyway.

That’s because smart drugs influence the concentration of neurotransmitters in the brain. Performance is highest at an optimal concentration, and both having too low and too high levels can make it worse. If you are a low performer, increasing your probably low concentration of a certain neurotransmitter with a smart drug can help you. If you are a high performer, you are probably close to having an optimal neurotransmitter concentration already and increasing it further will not improve your performance – it will make it worse. So there is an upper limit of how much can be achieved with brain doping. This is even true for low performers: by taking too many smart drugs, you just push your neurotransmitter level above the optimum and get reduced smartness in return.

Where does this leave us?

Instead of taking smart drugs, going for a run or taking a nap might actually be a better idea. Research shows that physical exercise improves, for instance, memory and learning, especially if done regularly. Similarly, sleep can improve brain power, even if you are not tired. It has particularly large positive effects on memory, but can also increase creativity. Even naps as short as six minutes during daytime can improve memory.

There are so far no studies that directly compare such non-pharmacological means to improve cognitive performance with smart drugs, but it appears that smart drugs are not more effective.

Some might argue that smart drugs are therefore no big deal at all – and that we we should simply stop thinking that it’s unfair to take them. I don’t think it is that simple. People still tend to overestimate the effectiveness of smart drugs, which may lead them to order such drugs from an unregulated black market on the internet – despite the potential long-term side effects. The truth is that we just don’t know whether there are any such side effects yet.

Also, overestimating the power of smart drugs can stigmatise users and create tensions between users and non-users, for example when they work together in teams. Our task as scientists is to help people get an accurate picture of what smart drugs can do – and what they cannot.

The Conversation

By Nadira Faber, Research Fellow, University of Oxford

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

RELATED

Traditional beliefs can shift the link between beauty and women’s sexual openness, new research suggests
Cannabis

Lumberjack amputates ears and penis during psychotic episode linked to cannabis and kratom use

August 14, 2025

A 31-year-old man amputated his ears and penis while in a psychotic state after consuming cannabis and kratom. The case report underscores the rare but severe psychiatric risks of these substances.

Read moreDetails
Psilocybin might be effective for treatment-resistant depression even with ongoing SSRI use, study suggests
Psychedelic Drugs

Psychedelic experiences may offer a lasting boost in perceived life meaning

August 11, 2025

New research suggests that psychedelics may offer more than momentary insight—they tend to leave people with a stronger sense of meaning in life. Across three studies, participants reported lasting increases in existential fulfillment after psychedelic experiences.

Read moreDetails
Hemp-derived cannabigerol shows promise in reducing anxiety — and maybe even improving memory
Anxiety

Inflammation levels may shape how cannabis affects anxiety and sleep

August 11, 2025

A study of adults with anxiety found that cannabis products with higher cannabidiol (CBD) content tended to improve mood and sleep regardless of inflammation, while the effects of THC-dominant cannabis varied with participants’ baseline inflammatory status.

Read moreDetails
Pet dogs fail to favor generous people over selfish ones in tests
Psychedelic Drugs

Psychedelic benefits may partially depend on your personality, new research suggests

August 9, 2025

High openness nearly doubled the odds of reporting lasting positive changes from a psychedelic trip, while high neuroticism raised the odds of negative aftereffects by 56%, according to new research examining the role of the Big Five personality traits.

Read moreDetails
Ketamine shows promise for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder in new study
Ketamine

Ketamine’s paradox: Life-changing therapy for some, devastating addiction for others

August 8, 2025

Ketamine’s popularity is surging in both medical and recreational circles, but so are its risks. A new international survey of people addicted to the drug sheds light on severe health effects, treatment shortcomings, and the urgent need for better care.

Read moreDetails
Professors who use safe space language seen as more caring—and more authoritarian
Psilocybin

Religious leaders become more effective after two supported psilocybin sessions

August 7, 2025

A groundbreaking study has found that psilocybin can profoundly affect religious leaders, enhancing their spiritual lives and emotional well-being. Six months after two guided sessions, clergy from major world religions reported lasting positive changes in faith, mood, and leadership effectiveness.

Read moreDetails
Common “cat poop” parasite hijacks brain chemistry through infected neuron vesicles
Psychedelic Drugs

Psychedelic experiences linked to identity shifts and improved mental health among LGBTQIA+ individuals

August 6, 2025

A new study explores how psychedelic experiences may influence identity and mental health among LGBTQIA+ individuals. Survey data suggest that these substances are linked to greater self-acceptance, reduced psychological distress, and meaningful changes in gender and sexual identity exploration.

Read moreDetails
New psychology research reveals why people stay in situationships
COVID-19

New study links psychedelic use to mental health recovery in times of crisis

August 4, 2025

Unlike other drug users, individuals who used psychedelics and cannabis during the pandemic saw average improvements in anxiety and depression, according to a UK-based longitudinal study that tracked mental health before and after COVID-19 restrictions.

Read moreDetails

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New technology reveals how autism disrupts brain cell communication

New neuroscience research links psychopathy’s antisocial features to distinct brain structure abnormalities

Positivity resonance predicts lasting love, according to new psychology research

Common infections during pregnancy unlikely to impact children’s intelligence, large study finds

Scientists uncover brain’s “reset button” for splitting memories into distinct events

Lumberjack amputates ears and penis during psychotic episode linked to cannabis and kratom use

Children begin weighing confidence in others’ opinions by age 8, study suggests

New study links celebrity worship to narcissism, materialism, and perceived similarity

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy