Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Mental Health

Study suggests the 2020 election resulted in increased anxiety and depression across political spectrums

by Laura Staloch
January 1, 2023
in Mental Health, Political Psychology
(Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

(Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in the United States report more depression and anxiety. The 2020 data is significant as rates of anxiety and depression in the weeks before the November presidential election can be compared with survey data taken in April 2020, the beginning of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, when many Americans would have been concerned about their health and economic security.

Despite these worries, Americans were still more anxious and depressed in November 2020. Examining survey results in 2020 (a unique and challenging year) may help us understand the American elections’ psychological effect.

The new research has been published in the journal Economics & Human Biology.

Elections in the United States, especially presidential elections, are well-publicized events that most Americans feel pressure to participate in. In the last few decades, politicians have had the funding to advertise non-stop. Any attempt at relaxing with a television show, YouTube video, or a scroll through Facebook will leave one inundated with political calls to action.

The 2020 election was unique as many Americans wondered if the election results would be a reflection of the votes cast. According to the study’s author Sankar Mukhopadhyay, “A survey conducted by the American Psychological Association in September of 2020 found that the presidential election was a source of stress for 68% of Americans, substantially higher than the corresponding number for the 2016 election (52%). After the election, there were allegations of irregularity and malaise. The results were unprecedentedly contested, leading to chaos and uncertainty over two months culminating in an insurrection on January 6, 2021.”

Mukhopadhyay used data from the Household Pulse Survey (HPS) to further investigate the mental health experiences of Americans before and after the November 2020 presidential election. The HPS was conducted weekly and then bi-weekly in the United States and gathered a representative sample of responses. The HPS collects data on mental illness, mental health visits, prescription use, and socio-economic data. The survey was given using the same questions 40 times, providing a significant amount of comparable data.

Examining responses from the HPS, Mukhopadhyay discovered rates of anxiety increased 73% over baseline during the days leading up to the election. This decreased somewhat after Election Day but remained high and was at 55% over baseline the week of January 6, 2021.

Depression was 52% higher than baseline the week of the election and remained slightly over 50% through the week of the storming of the U.S. Capitol building. Likely in conjunction with the higher-than-normal anxiety and depression levels, mental health visits and prescription usage were up 29% the week of the election.

Mukhopadhyay also compared results from states voting Republican majority versus those with a Democratic majority and found that results were the same across voting patterns. This may indicate that the mental health effects are similar regardless of the political party or who is projected to win.

Mukhopadhyay acknowledged that the HPS did not ask respondents if they were voters, limiting conclusions that can be made about mental health concerns for those who do not participate in elections. In addition, the HPS did not ask about citizenship status, leaving us to wonder if non-citizens were more or less anxious about the election results.

Regardless of these limitations, this study provides a window into the election cycle’s potential consequences on modern Americans. Mukhodapadhay summarized his results this way, “This paper shows that closely fought elections can have significant adverse effects on mental health. We also show that in addition to the increased self-reported symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety and depression, the 2020 election also led to increased use of anxiety and depression-related mental health visits and prescription drug use.”

The study, “Elections have (health) consequences: Depression, anxiety, and the 2020 presidential election“, was authored by Sankar Mukhopadhyay.

RELATED

Psychology researchers identify a “burnout to extremism” pipeline
Depression

Brief computer-assisted therapy alters brain connectivity in depression

December 18, 2025
Early trauma may hinder the ability to communicate sexual needs and boundaries in adulthood
Mental Health

Trigger sounds impair speech perception for people with misophonia

December 18, 2025
Brain circuits tied to depression’s “negativity effect” uncovered
ADHD

Combining brain scans and gene data improves prediction of ADHD impulsivity

December 17, 2025
Study links social aspects of pickleball to improved student energy levels
Mental Health

Study links social aspects of pickleball to improved student energy levels

December 17, 2025
Inflamed human digestive system highlighting stomach and intestines, medical illustration emphasizing gastrointestinal health and its impact on mental well-being and psychology news.
Anxiety

Scientists find the biological footprint of social anxiety may reside partially in the gut

December 17, 2025
New psychology research flips the script on happiness and self-control
Mental Health

New psychology research flips the script on happiness and self-control

December 16, 2025
Ayahuasca retreat participants report greater gratitude and nature appreciation after the experience, study finds
Addiction

Recent LSD use linked to lower odds of alcohol use disorder

December 15, 2025
Paternal psychological strengths linked to lower maternal inflammation in married couples
Political Psychology

Progressives and traditional liberals generate opposing mental images of J.K. Rowling

December 15, 2025

PsyPost Merch

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New AI system reduces the mental effort of using bionic hands

Brief computer-assisted therapy alters brain connectivity in depression

Scientists propose cognitive “digital twins” to monitor and protect mental health

Trigger sounds impair speech perception for people with misophonia

Study sheds light on household labor dynamics for women partnered with women vs. men

Women are more accurate than men at detecting signs of sickness in faces

Alcohol use linked to lower psychological resilience in soldiers, study finds

Large meta-analysis links TikTok and Instagram Reels to poorer cognitive and mental health

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Study finds consumers must be relaxed for gamified ads to drive sales
  • Brain scans reveal increased neural effort when marketing messages miss the mark
  • Mental reconnection in the morning fuels workplace proactivity
  • The challenge of selling the connected home
  • Consumers prefer emotionally intelligent AI, but not for guilty pleasures
         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy