PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

The neurophysiological underpinnings of malevolent creativity might vary by gender

by Emily Manis
March 19, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
The brain is shown with a wave of sound
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Malevolent creativity, or using creativity in a way that is meant to harm others, can be seen in members of either gender. But a study published in Brain Research suggests that though potential for malevolent creativity may be comparable between women and men, the brain mechanisms that underlie it vary.

Maladaptive behavior can occur in members of either sex, but there are often gender differences that arise. Research suggests that men are more physically aggressive than women, while women prefer social and relational aggression. Malevolent creativity, or using creative ideas to lie, bully, blackmail, assault, defame, or play mean pranks on people is linked to other maladaptive traits such as narcissism and psychopathy.

Past research has been mixed on gender differences, with some studies reporting higher rates of malevolent creativity in men and others reporting higher rates in women. Due to the lack of understanding surrounding the relationship between gender and malevolent creativity, this study sought to better understand the neurological mechanisms that contribute to it.

For their study, Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan and colleagues utilized 88 participants between the ages of 18 and 46 years old to serve as their sample. All participants reported no psychiatric history, neurological illnesses, substance use, or psychotropic medication. This study utilized an EEG design. Participants completed self-report measures prior to the EEG that assessed current mood, antagonistic personality, and self-reported malevolent creativity behavior. During the EEG, participants completed a malevolent creativity test in which participants are presented with a negative social situation in which they were treated unfairly and are asked to generate as many original revenge ideas as they can.

Results showed that there were no significant gender differences in either self-reported or total malevolent creativity performance scores. But men’s ideas were rated as significantly more harmful than women’s ideas. Men included a higher degree of physical violence into their ideas while women favored ideas that reflected social aggression, though these effects were small and not statistically significant.

The researchers also found differences in EEG results between the genders that pointed to discrepancies in functional connectivity and brain activity. Women showed decreased task-related alpha power from the frontal to left central-temporal lobe, while men showed a less steep and more diffuse pattern of alpha power changes. Additionally, men showed lower functional coupling than women. This suggests that women rely on executive control for their malevolent creativity, while men are likely displaying malevolent creativity through more spontaneous brain processes.

“Adding a novel perspective to previously reported gender differences in malevolent creativity, the present study demonstrated that women and men are similarly capable of malevolent creative ideation, but seem to utilize different neurocognitive processes in their efforts to exact creative revenge on others: While men rely on less controlled motor imagination that may initialize ideas geared towards physical punishment, women more strongly engage executive and semantic processes that may yield more intricate social aggression,” the researchers wrote.

This study took interesting and important strides toward better understanding the differing neurological underpinnings of malevolent creativity for each gender. Despite this, there are limitations to note. One such limitation is that some of these relationships were only seen at a trend level and did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, the study did not control for other factors that could be relevant, such as dark triad traits or menstrual cycle.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“In light of the reciprocal linkup of neurophysiology and behavior, further research on gender differences in malevolent creativity may have crucial practical implications for the detection and prevention of the infinite variety of malevolent creative acts in real-life,” the researchers concluded.

The study, “Women and men have a similar potential for malevolent creativity- But their underlying brain mechanisms are different“, was authored by Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan, Christian Rominger, Ilona Papousek, and Andreas Fink.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin4ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • A computational model explains the sudden rise in societal division
  • Harsh parenting predicts teenage depression and aggression through different types of repetitive thinking
  • The surprising reason our memories become blurred as we age, according to new neuroscience research
  • Heavy ChatGPT use linked to intellectual laziness and social isolation
  • Poor emotional regulation in anxious kids is linked to greater family accommodation

Science of Money

  • Why the same risk carries different prices in different financial markets
  • The geopolitics of gold: How sanction risks are reshaping global reserves
  • How workers are actually using generative AI on the job
  • How extraordinary experiences and personality traits shape emotional brand attachment
  • What Chinese beauty influencers reveal about the limits of the Silicon Valley playbook

Recent

  • Comedy is funnier when it is easier to process, new psychology study finds
  • People with unfulfilled romantic needs form stronger attachments to fictional characters
  • Scientists build a more accurate Alzheimer’s risk score using global DNA data
  • Personality impairments link childhood maltreatment to adult anxiety
  • First human trial of psilocin since the 1960s reveals better tolerability than psilocybin
  • Watching violent online pornography is linked to poorer sexual health
  • Scientists map the brain pathway that links social isolation to increased alcohol consumption
  • Brain damage reveals how a specific region generates mind-wandering
  • Over half the risk for postpartum psychosis is tied to genetics, large study finds
  • Study reveals a double standard in how we view AI-assisted communication

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc