Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Study finds using a fidget spinner can impair memory and attention

by Eric W. Dolan
November 15, 2019
in Cognitive Science
(Photo credit: weyo)

(Photo credit: weyo)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research indicates that fidget spinners can be harmful to learning in classroom settings. The study was recently published in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology.

“A few years ago, the discussion about the efficacy of fidget objects was suddenly a national conversation. In light of this debate, some of my students asked me if I thought fidget spinners might help with classroom learning and attention. So, I decided to gather some data to help answer this question,” explained study author Julia Soares, a PhD Candidate at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

In two experiments, the researchers found that fidget spinners could negatively affect memory and attention.

In the first experiment, 98 undergraduate students watched a 15-minute educational video lecture on baking bread while either using a fidget spinner or not using a fidget spinner. In addition, half of the participants not using a fidget spinner were randomly assigned to watch the lecture while sitting near someone using a fidget spinner.

A fill-in-the blank memory test showed that participants who used fidget spinners answered significantly fewer questions correctly about the material covered in the video. Participants who used fidget spinners were also more likely to report “zoning out” and having difficulty staying on task while watching the video.

Participants who were sitting near someone using a fidget spinner, however, did not appear to be affected.

The researchers then conducted the experiment again. However, this time around they specifically recruited 48 undergraduates who believed that fidget spinners could help them focus in class.

But the results were the same.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Contrary to the claims made by fidget-spinner retailers, our participants’ learning was not aided by their use of a fidget spinner while learning. In fact, when participants used fidget spinners while watching video lectures, they performed worse on a memory test of the lectured content relative to when they didn’t use fidget spinners,” Soares told PsyPost.

“This effect was observed across two experiments. Our participants also reported being aware of the deleterious effects of using a fidget spinner on their learning but were apparently unwilling or unable to compensate for the distraction caused by using the fidget spinner.”

But the study — like all research — includes some limitations.

“These data were collected from a population of college students, so they cannot speak to how fidget spinners might differently affect individuals with, for example, learning disabilities. Still, these findings suggest that students who are having trouble focusing in class might want to try evidence-based treatments over fidget spinners,” Soares explained.

“It’s also worth noting that people use fidget objects for many other uses than aiding classroom learning. Our intention with this paper was not to imply that fidget objects can’t be useful. Additional studies should investigate how using fidget objects might affect things like emotion regulation and boredom reduction.”

The study, “Putting a negative spin on it: Using a fidget spinner can impair memory for a video lecture“, was authored by Julia S. Soares and Benjamin C. Storm.

Previous Post

Meta-analysis of 83 studies produces ‘very strong’ evidence for a negative relationship between intelligence and religiosity

Next Post

Some people are willing to pay money to avoid receiving prayers in the wake of a hardship

RELATED

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

April 18, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music

April 18, 2026
How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

Higher intelligence in adolescence linked to lower mental illness risk in adulthood

April 17, 2026
Sorting Hat research: What does your Hogwarts house say about your psychological makeup?
Cognitive Science

Maturing brain pathways explain the sudden leap in children’s language skills

April 17, 2026
Republican lawmakers lead the trend of using insults to chase media attention instead of policy wins
Business

Children with obesity face a steep decline in adult economic mobility

April 16, 2026
Study reveals lasting impact of compassion training on moral expansiveness
Meditation

A daily mindfulness habit can improve your memory for future plans

April 15, 2026
New study confirms: Thinking hard feels unpleasant
Cognitive Science

Why thinking hard feels bad: the emotional root of deliberation

April 14, 2026
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

Your breathing pattern is as unique as a fingerprint

April 12, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Why personalized ads sometimes backfire: A research review explains when tailoring messages works and when it doesn’t
  • The common advice to avoid high customer expectations may not be backed by evidence
  • Personality-matched persuasion works better, but mismatched messages can backfire
  • When happy customers and happy employees don’t add up: How investor signals have shifted in the social media age
  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds

LATEST

Early exposure to forever chemicals linked to altered brain genes and impulsive behavior in rats

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

Disclosing autism to AI chatbots prompts overly cautious, stereotypical advice

Can choking during sex cause brain damage? Emerging evidence points to hidden neurological risks

The decline of hypergamy: How a surge in university degrees changed marriage in the US and France

New research finds a persistent and growing leftward tilt in the social sciences

How a year of regular exercise alters the biology of stress

Scientists tested the creativity of AI models, and the results were surprisingly homogeneous

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc