PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Women tend to have better sexual outcomes in committed relationships — but there’s an important caveat

by Eric W. Dolan
November 7, 2019
Reading Time: 3 mins read
(Photo credit: gpointstudio)

(Photo credit: gpointstudio)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Women experience greater sexual outcomes in committed relationships compared to hookups, according to new research published in The Journal of Sex Research. But there’s an important exception to this trend: Women who are more open to short-term, casual sexual relationships tend to experience similar levels of orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction in both committed and casual sexual contexts.

“I became interested in this topic because female orgasm is very complex and can be affected by a wide array of factors including psychological, physiological, and environmental factors,” said study author Val Wongsomboon, a PhD candidate at Florida State University.

“It’s also well known that women tend to orgasm less often than men do, hence the word ‘orgasm gap.’ Many researchers have focused on orgasm gap between men and women. However, I realized there is also an orgasm gap among women themselves.”

“Some women orgasm all or most of the time while some rarely or never do, and this is greatly affected by contexts. Therefore, I started examining the orgasm/sexual satisfaction gap among women as I hope it will help us better understand women’s sexual function and satisfaction as a whole.”

For their study, the researchers surveyed 1,084 women who had been sexually active within the past 12 months. The participants ranged in age from 18 to 71, but the majority were between 18 to 24 years old.

In line with previous research, Wongsomboon and her colleagues found that, overall, women tended to report higher orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction in committed sexual relationships compared to casual ones. Even women who had sex in both committed and casual contexts in the past year were more likely to report higher orgasmic function in their committed than in their casual relationships.

“While sexual contexts matter for women’s orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction in general, this is not true for many women. Women in general had higher orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction when they had committed sex (sex in a romantic relationship) than when they had casual sex,” Wongsomboon told PsyPost.

“However, this is not true for women who had positive attitudes or were more inclined toward casual sexual relationships (we called this inclination ‘unrestricted sociosexual orientation’). These sexually unrestricted women did not experience the difference between committed vs. casual sex.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

In other words, this orgasm gap did not exist among women who strongly agreed with statements such as “Sex without love is OK” and who reported having more fantasies about having sex with someone they just met.

“The more unrestricted they are, the greater orgasmic function they had in casual sex (but also lower sexual satisfaction in committed sex). The takeaway message is, different women have different needs. Instead of telling them what kind of sexual relationship is ‘better’ for their sexual lives, it’s more about what works for them,” Wongsomboon explained.

The study — like all research — includes some limitations.

“This is a correlational study. We cannot say what causes what or why the phenomena happened. For example, we do not know why sociosexually restricted women experienced the gap while unrestricted women did not. In addition, the majority of the sample were quite young. Thus, the findings may not apply to older women,” Wongsomboon said.

The researchers also found that more sexually restricted women in committed relationships reported greater sexual satisfaction than did more unrestricted women in committed relationships. But more sexually restricted women did not have greater orgasmic function in committed relationships than unrestricted women.

“We are not suggesting that committed sex is ‘better’ than casual sex (or vice versa) for women. Many people tend to interpret our findings that way. However, we should not fall prey to the notion that there is a specific type of relationships that works best for all women, that casual sex is not for women, or that casual sex will harm women,” Wongsomboon added.

“Again, all women are different. Although our findings showed that contexts do matter for women’s orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction in general, the degree to which they matter is different for different women. Some women may find committed sex more satisfying, some may find sex equally good in any contexts, and some may find casual sex more satisfying.”

The study, “Women’s Orgasm and Sexual Satisfaction in Committed Sex and Casual Sex: Relationship Between Sociosexuality and Sexual Outcomes in Different Sexual Contexts“, was authored by Val Wongsomboon, Mary H. Burleson, and Gregory D. Webster.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Narcissistic individuals are more prone to problematic use of generative AI
  • Wealth and air pollution emerge as top predictors of state autism rates
  • Scientists develop a groundbreaking vaccine that outsmarts illicit fentanyl analogs
  • Trump’s 2020 pivot on face masks changed Republican behavior but not their medical beliefs
  • Book smarts and life smarts are driven by the exact same intelligence, study finds

Science of Money

  • The hidden language of packaging and why shoppers grant their approval
  • Screens on shopping carts nudge shoppers to spend more, even on items that aren’t on sale
  • Personality traits and social cues both feed crypto risk-taking, researchers report
  • What makes millennials engage with fashion influencers on Facebook?
  • Study finds “The Wolf of Wall Street” still sells the dream of greed to business students

Recent

  • Researchers identify risk factors for addictive use of cosmetic procedures
  • Study finds societal affluence is linked to wider gender gaps in STEM graduation
  • Is AI making us stupid through cognitive offloading? New review explores the evidence
  • High fluoride exposure breaks down brain cell structures in laboratory mice
  • A hidden electrical process in the inner ear allows humans to perceive extremely low sounds
  • Linking bipolar disorder vulnerability to cannabis habits in college
  • The surprising link between routine vaccines and Alzheimer’s risk
  • Men become somewhat more supportive of feminine honor norms when they feel jealous
  • New study explores the psychological chain behind involuntary sexual thoughts
  • Short-video viewing temporarily shuts down cognitive control networks, study finds

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc