Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Partisanship predicts belief in fake news more strongly than conspiracy mentality, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
February 6, 2020
in Political Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Political bias might be more important in predicting acceptance of fake news than a conspiratorial mindset, according to new research published in the journal Social Psychology.

“We have been astonished to see how recently, and especially with the advent of social media, the influence of fake news on political decisions has intensified. Even important political events, such as an election, can be influenced by fake news. While the literature mainly emphasized the susceptibility of people with conservative attitudes, we were curious about how universal a phenomenon this could be,” said study author Laura Faragó, a PhD student at Eötvös Loránd University.

In the study, 1,012 Hungarian participants who ranged in age from 17 to 77 were asked to read headlines and then rate the probability that the news was written by an independent journalist. The headlines included pro-government fake news, anti-government fake news, non-political fake news, and real non-political news.

The researchers found that partisanship was an important predictor of belief in the fake news headlines.

Supporters of the current Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán, were more likely to rate the pro-government fake news as coming from an independent source and were more likely to believe that the pro-government fake news was real. But Orbán supporters were less likely to view the anti-government fake news as real.

Opponents of Orbán’s government, on the other hand, were more likely to rate the anti-government fake news as coming from an independent source and were more likely to believe that the anti-government fake news was real, but were more skeptical of the pro-government fake news.

Conspiracy mentality, a measure of one’s propensity to endorse conspiracy theories, was only weakly linked to belief in anti-government fake news.

“Despite fake news and conspiracy theories often being mentioned interchangeably, our research revealed that they do not necessarily overlap. We focused on wish-fulfilling political fake news, which was unrelated to the general mentality to believe in conspiracy theories. Therefore, our research suggests that pipedream fake news is processed like any other information,” Faragó explained.

The researchers replicated these findings in a second study of 382 Hungarian university students, which included a larger number of headlines.

“The most important message from our study is that everyone can fall prey to fake information,” Faragó told PsyPost.

“We falsely think that we are immune to fake news and expect that only gullible people can be deceived. However, if we encounter fake news that is consistent with our pre-existing beliefs and ideologies, we are more likely to believe in it, and reject the inconsistent information.”

“The perception of the source is also important in the evaluation process: if the news is consistent with our beliefs, we more likely think that the news was written by an independent journalist, but if the news contradicts our viewpoint, we assume that it is biased and part of political propaganda,” Faragó added.

“When we read news, the satisfaction with the economic situation is also an important factor: if we are satisfied with the economy and the political management, we will trust pro-government news more, even if it is fake, and regard opposition news as political propaganda.”

“Therefore, we should read news that come from our own side even more critically,” Faragó said.

The study — like all research — includes some caveats.

“We identified the importance of partisanship (supporting or opposing a political party) in the acceptance of fake news. However, other scholars argue that the key to understand this phenomenon lies in critical thinking, which is indeed important in overcoming fake news,” Faragó explained.

“In our next research project, we aim to test both partisanship and critical thinking, and compare which has a stronger effect on differentiating fake news from real ones.”

The study, “We Only Believe in News That We Doctored Ourselves: The Connection Between Partisanship and Political Fake News“, was authored by Laura Faragó, Anna Kende, and Péter Krekó.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors
Artificial Intelligence

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

July 15, 2025

Can an AI understand a political metaphor? Researchers pitted ChatGPT against the speeches of Donald Trump to find out. The model showed moderate success in detection but ultimately struggled with context, highlighting the current limits of automated language analysis.

Read moreDetails
New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election
Anxiety

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

July 13, 2025

Among young adults, stress from election news was linked to higher risks of depression and anxiety, while pre-election anticipatory stress was linked to depression only. Stress about the election outcome was not associated with either condition.

Read moreDetails
Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is
Political Psychology

Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is

July 12, 2025

New research finds that students with different political identities tend to engage in slightly different everyday behaviors. But students dramatically overestimate how much liberals and conservatives differ, fueling a distorted sense of social and political division.

Read moreDetails
Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds
Political Psychology

Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds

July 10, 2025

What if the key to swaying a swing voter lies in their biology? New research found giving testosterone to weakly affiliated Democratic men made them less loyal to their party and more open to Republicans, revealing a potential hormonal link to political persuasion.

Read moreDetails
People with psychopathic traits fail to learn from painful outcomes
Narcissism

National narcissism linked to emotional impairments and dehumanization, new study finds

July 7, 2025

A new study suggests that people who see their nation as uniquely important often struggle with recognizing emotions and experience more anger and contempt—factors that may help explain why they’re more likely to dehumanize both outsiders and fellow citizens.

Read moreDetails
Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails
New study suggests Donald Trump’s “fake news” attacks are backfiring
Political Psychology

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

July 5, 2025

Why has politics become so personal? The answers may lie in our minds. These 13 studies from the new science of political behavior reveal the hidden psychological forces—from personality to primal fear—that are driving us further apart.

Read moreDetails
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Political Psychology

Despite political tensions, belief in an impending U.S. civil war remains low

July 4, 2025

A new national survey finds that only a small fraction of Americans believe civil war is likely or necessary.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Scientists identify the brain’s built-in brake for binge drinking

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

Childhood maltreatment linked to emotion regulation difficulties and teen mental health problems

Caffeine may help prevent depression-like symptoms by protecting the gut-brain connection

Secret changes to major U.S. health datasets raise alarms

Moral outrage spreads petitions online—but doesn’t always inspire people to sign them

The triglyceride-glucose index: Can it predict depression risk in the elderly?

People with ADHD exhibit altered brain activity before making high-stakes choices

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy