PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

New research uncovers what really matters for couples’ relationship and sexual satisfaction

by Eric W. Dolan
December 13, 2020
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Contrary to popular belief, new research indicates that mismatches in sexual desire between partners are not associated with poorer relationship outcomes. Instead, couples with higher overall levels of desire tend to be more satisfied — even if there is a mismatch between partners.

The results from the new study appear in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.

“Sex plays an important part in couples’ lives, but couples often have differing levels of sexual desire,” said study author James Kim, a postdoctoral fellow at Western University and member of the Relationship Decisions Lab.

“Conventional wisdom and evidence from past research suggests that partners who are more similar (i.e., match) in their levels of sexual desire are also more satisfied. However, the past research on this topic has not disentangled the extent to which satisfaction is actually due to partners specifically matching on desire, or due to partners’ overall level of desire.”

In the study, 366 heterosexual couples individually completed assessments of sexual desire, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction.

Previous research has measured mismatches in desire by subtracting one partner’s self-reported desire from the other partner’s score. But for the new study, Kim and his colleagues used a statistical method known as dyadic response surface analysis to test whether satisfaction was higher for couples who matched versus mismatched at all levels of sexual desire.

“For example, if Mary has much lower desire than her partner and is unhappy in her relationship, is her unhappiness because of her desire being highly different from her partner’s, or because she simply has lower desire? We wanted to explicitly test whether matching on sexual desire actually has a unique effect in predicting couples’ satisfaction,” Kim explained.

Using this method, the researchers found no evidence that couples who matched in sexual desire were more satisfied than those who were mismatched. Rather, the overall level of sexual desire appeared to be the most important factor.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Contrary to prevailing beliefs, we did not find that couples who were more closely matched on desire were significantly happier with their relationship or sex life than couples who were mismatched: there was no unique effect of matching,” Kim told PsyPost.

“Instead, we found that what really matters for couples’ relationship and sexual satisfaction is partners having higher levels of sexual desire. This suggests that rather than trying to align partners’ levels of sexual desire to be more similar, couples can build a more satisfying sexual relationship by focusing on strategies to manage these differences (e.g. communicating effectively when sexual desire is low) or finding ways to boost or reignite sexual desire in the relationship.”

However, the study — like all research — includes some caveats.

“In this study, we looked at each partner’s self-reported levels of trait sexual desire, so couples were determined to be matched or mismatched based on these variables. However, we didn’t assess people’s perceptions of matching. People may perceive there to be discrepancies in desire when in fact there are none, and vice versa,” Kim explained.

“Thus, one remaining question that would be important to address is whether partners are aware of differences in their levels of desire, especially since previous work finds that perceptions of desire discrepancy are a stronger predictor of lower satisfaction than actual discrepancies between partners.”

The study, “Are Couples More Satisfied When They Match in Sexual Desire? New Insights From Response Surface Analyses“, was authored by James J. Kim, Amy Muise, Max Barranti, Kristen P. Mark, Natalie O. Rosen, Cheryl Harasymchuk, and Emily Impett.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • The human brain reorganizes itself at four distinct ages
  • Lower-class employees face greater professional backlash for negotiating their salaries
  • Brain scans reveal lasting tissue and chemical changes in both long COVID and recovered patients
  • A man began hearing voices from his body parts after receiving testosterone injections
  • Adolescent binge drinking permanently alters adult brain sensitivity to alcohol

Science of Money

  • The hidden asymmetry in how coworkers respond to each other’s feelings
  • A good brand match does more for fake influencers than real ones
  • When teams split into cliques, this leadership style may help them get creative again
  • Why salaried jobs might handle AI differently than hourly ones
  • Fiscal news becomes inflationary only under one condition, study finds

Recent

  • Brains of teens with depression remain on high alert to social rejection
  • Gen Z Americans are more willing to use blockades and violence to stop public speakers
  • University teachers with a strong sense of purpose report higher job satisfaction
  • Scientists discover an epigenetic mechanism that links childhood trauma to adult stress sensitivity
  • Brain imaging reveals why some people struggle to resist sweet foods
  • Researchers identify two key factors driving prejudice against asexual individuals
  • New study tracks oxytocin spikes in MDMA therapy trials
  • Negative social media posts correlated with changes in the brain’s fear network during the COVID-19 lockdown
  • Severe e-scooter crashes result in higher rates of traumatic brain injuries than motorcycle accidents
  • People who imagine their future without anyone else in it aren’t loners by nature — new research suggests it’s a learned defense that quietly collapses the moment the imagined future turns stressful

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc