Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

“Fake news” often means news that contradicts our worldview

by Eric W. Dolan
April 15, 2021
in Political Psychology

[Subscribe to PsyPost on YouTube to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in psychology and neuroscience]

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New research provides evidence that the news sources people consider to be “fake news” are the ones that conflict with their pre-existing political beliefs. The study, published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, found that news sources considered by conservatives to provide real news were considered by liberals to be sources of fake news and propaganda, and vice versa.

“My colleague and I noted an explosion in popularity of the term ‘fake news’ around the time of the 2016 US Presidential election,” said study author Robert B. Michael, who co-authored the research with Brooke O. Breaux. Both are assistant professors of psychology at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

“We began wondering how people interpret that term: Who and what do people believe is ‘fake news’ and why? Is ‘fake news’ simply another way of saying ‘propaganda?’ Are there certain characteristics — like a person’s political affiliation — that can predict which specific sources of information are labeled ‘fake news?’ If so, then there might be alarming consequences for people’s interpretations of the news.”

The researchers used Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to recruit 700 American participants for three separate but similar studies, which were conducted in March 2017, April 2018, and August 2020. Michael and Breaux found there was a link between political affiliation and whether a particular new sources was considered as a purveyor of “fake news.”

“What we believe constitutes ‘fake news’ varies from person to person, as expected,” the researchers told PsyPost. “But importantly, we seem to be prone to a bias in belief about where fake news comes from.”

“Specifically, news sources considered ‘real’ by one side of the political spectrum are often considered ‘fake’ by the other — and vice versa. This bias is likely due to our motivation to see consistency and truth in sources that fit our political views. It does not seem to reflect a difference in our familiarity with various news sources, nor our ability to think critically.”

In the studies, participants were shown a list of 42 news outlets and asked to individually rate the extent to which they believed each was a source of real news, fake news, and propaganda.

As expected, fake news and propaganda were highly correlated. But, based on an analysis of written responses, conservatives tended to see a larger overlap between fake news and propaganda, while liberals believed there was more of a distinction between the two concepts.

The researcher also found that conservative participants tended to believe that the 42 news outlets in general provided more fake news and more propaganda compared to their liberal counterparts. While conservatives viewed the news outlets as providing less real news than liberals in 2017, this difference disappeared in 2018 and the relationship was reversed in 2020.

“The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about which sources are ‘fake’ or ‘real’ seems to be shifting over time — but it’s not clear where exactly this relationship is headed,” Michael explained.

But the study — like all research — includes some caveats. “We don’t know to what extent this bias affects people’s interpretations of actual news information (or misinformation), when reported from different sources,” Michael said. “We also don’t know which political ‘camp’ (left or right) is more correct in their beliefs about which sources constitute fake news.”

The study, “The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of ‘fake news’“, was published February 12, 2021.

ShareTweetSendScanShareSharePin1Send

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

STAY CONNECTED

TRENDING

When skin becomes smoother, the face is seen as prettier, even if it isn’t detectable

One in four people may experience estrangement from a sibling in adulthood, study finds

Exposure to social media can increase adolescent materialism but can be tempered with high self-esteem and mindfulness

Virtual reality can inoculate people against the allure of alternative romantic partners, study finds

Massive study sheds light on the psychological consequences of COVID-19 distress among workers

Study uncovers a “particularly alarming” link between men’s feelings of personal deprivation and hostile sexism

RECENT

Buying into conspiracy theories can be exciting – that’s what makes them dangerous

Is sexual loneliness a public health problem?

Massive study sheds light on the psychological consequences of COVID-19 distress among workers

New study links psychedelic drug experience to certain positive health behaviors

Electrical brain stimulation techniques can enhance hypnotizability, study finds

Exposure to social media can increase adolescent materialism but can be tempered with high self-esteem and mindfulness

An individual’s personality traits may influence their desire to make environmentally friendly food choices

Nipple erection influences perceptions of women’s intelligence, morality, and sexuality

Currently Playing

Individuals with dark personality traits are less oriented towards long-term mating strategies

Disclosing victim status reduces online dating matches regardless of race or sex

Individuals with dark personality traits are less oriented towards long-term mating strategies

Dark Triad
Longitudinal study examines the effects of adversity on wise reasoning

New study examines the psychological mechanisms underlying Solomon’s paradox

Social Psychology
Engaging in religious practice, even if you don’t believe, may increase your capacity to delay gratification

Engaging in religious practice, even if you don’t believe, may increase your capacity to delay gratification

Cognitive Science
New study sheds light on how three distinct types of first impressions predict subsequent dating outcomes

New study sheds light on how three distinct types of first impressions predict subsequent dating outcomes

Relationships and Sexual Health
A single, moderate dose of psilocybin reduces depressive symptoms for at least two weeks, controlled study finds

A single, moderate dose of psilocybin reduces depressive symptoms for at least two weeks, controlled study finds

Depression
Study identifies factors that influence the link between men’s body esteem and their ability to enjoy their sexuality

Study identifies factors that influence the link between men’s body esteem and their ability to enjoy their sexuality

Mental Health
  • Cognitive Science
  • COVID-19
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Drug Research
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Meditation
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Aviation Psychology and Human Factors
  • Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychedelic Drugs
  • Dark Triad
  • Political Psychology

About

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • About PsyPost
    • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.