Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Reading fiction early in life is associated with a more complex worldview, study finds

by Patricia Y. Sanchez
August 25, 2022
in Social Psychology

[Subscribe to PsyPost on YouTube to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in psychology and neuroscience]

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Research has demonstrated that people who read more fiction tend to have better perspective-taking abilities. Now, new research published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin has found that reading more fiction early in life is associated with a more complex worldview and increased empathic abilities.

“By introducing readers to difference, even if that difference is not expressed as a different cast of mind, we argue that fictional experience can nevertheless remind readers that the world is complex, not simple; with powerful psychological effects,” explained study author Nicholas Buttrick and colleagues. “Fiction, in other words, does more than just give people social practice—by presenting difference, novelty, and even confusion, it underlines the idea of the world as a radically complicated place.”

People have differing levels of attributional complexity, which is one’s comfort with ambiguity and willingness to understand behavior in the context of a complex system. Readers of literary fiction, which is characterized by the introduction of a problem or difficulty in a world, may then have differing worldview complexity compared to non-readers.

For Study 1, researchers recruited a final sample of 369 American adults from Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online research platform. Participants completed measures assessing the genres they read early in life, attributional complexity (i.e., how much participants prefer complex explanations for social behavior over simple ones), and psychological richness (i.e., a sense that one’s life is interesting, and one is gaining wisdom).

Results showed that reading more overall was not associated with differences in attributional complexity; however, reading more romance novels, specifically, early in life was associated with lower attributional complexity. Frequency of reading fiction overall in early life, on the other hand, was associated with more psychological richness.

For Study 2, researchers wanted to extend these findings to understandings of systemic injustice to explore whether early life reading of fiction is related. They recruited a final sample of 2,243 American university students to participate.

Participants completed measures of both their current and early life reading habits and system justifying beliefs (i.e., how much one believes in the legitimacy of the current social order). The latter measure contained 4 sub-sections assessing participants’ belief in a just world, belief in the importance of hard work, belief that people can climb the social ladder, and belief that status differences in a society are appropriate.

Results showed that reading more literary fiction (both currently and in early life) was associated with a lower belief in system legitimacy.

For Study 3, the researchers expanded to a national sample and further sought to explore the relationship between reading habits and complexity of worldview. Using a survey firm, Lightspeed GMI, the researchers recruited a sample of 1,514 adults to participate.

Participants once again completed measures of reading habits and system justification as in Study 2. They also completed measures of psychological essentialism (i.e., one’s belief in the immutability of core human characteristics), empathic concern, and perspective-taking.

Results from Study 3 show that reading more fiction in early life, but not current reading habits, was associated with lower belief in system legitimacy. Similarly, those who read more literary fiction in early life were less likely to agree with the idea that people are only one type of way (i.e., essentialism discreteness). More reading of fiction overall was also associated with increased perspective-taking.

For Study 4, the researchers sought to replicate the findings of Studies 1 and 3 above in a large nationally representative American sample. Once again using Lightspeed GMI, the researchers recruited a final sample of 1,401 adults to participate. Participants again completed measures of their reading habits (as in Study 3), measures of attributional complexity and psychological richness (as in Study 1), and measures of belief in system legitimacy and essentialism discreteness (as in Study 2).

For exploratory purposes, participants also completed measures of intellectual humility (i.e., one’s willingness to realize their beliefs may be incorrect) and simple certain knowledge (i.e., one’s belief that knowledge is objective, static, and understood universally).

Results from Study 4 indicated that those who read more fiction in early life showed higher attributional complexity, more psychological richness, decreased beliefs in system legitimacy, and less agreement with essentialism.

Current fiction reading habits were not associated with attributional complexity or essentialist beliefs. However, reading more fiction currently was associated with more psychological richness and decreased beliefs in system legitimacy. Exploratory analyses suggest that reading more fiction in early life was associated with more intellectual humility and increased endorsement of simple certain knowledge.

“Across four studies (total [number of participants] = 5,176), including one preregistered replication with a nationally representative sample, we found that greater reading of literary fiction in early life predicted a more complex worldview in the present day among Americans,” the researchers said.

The authors cite some limitations to this work, such as the reliance on self-report for early life reading habits. Perhaps one’s memory of their early reading habits is less precise than that of their current reading habits. Further, we cannot say from these data alone whether the reading of fiction in early life caused these current changes in worldview, or vice versa. Perhaps people who are naturally empathic or inclined toward attributional complexity were more likely to seek fiction in early life.

The study, “Reading Literary Fiction Is Associated With a More Complex Worldview“, was authored by Nicholas Buttrick, Erin C. Westgate, and Shigehiro Oishi.

ShareTweetSendScanShareSharePin5Send

STAY CONNECTED

TRENDING

Harsh mothers more likely to have poor executive functioning and interpret others’ behavior as hostile

Machiavellianism most pronounced in students of politics and law, least pronounced in students of social work, nursing and education

Psychedelic treatment linked to substantial reduction in alcohol misuse and PTSD symptoms in US Special Operations Forces Veterans

Surprising link between exercise and negative memory bias discovered

Upward comparison on social media harms body image, self-esteem, and psychological well-being

Toxoplasma gondii parasite infection linked to cognitive deterioration in schizophrenia

RECENT

Scientists find that people use emojis to hide, as well as show, their feelings

Maladaptive personality traits can lead to social rejection via problematic love styles, study suggests

Psychedelic treatment linked to substantial reduction in alcohol misuse and PTSD symptoms in US Special Operations Forces Veterans

Upward comparison on social media harms body image, self-esteem, and psychological well-being

Study finds male heterosexuality is more precarious than women’s regardless of race

Machiavellianism most pronounced in students of politics and law, least pronounced in students of social work, nursing and education

Longitudinal study finds no evidence heavier smartphone use results from or triggers heightened stress

LGB individuals do not have better auditory “gaydar” compared to heterosexuals, study finds

Currently Playing

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Social Psychology
People with dark personality traits are better at finding novel ways to cause damage or harm others

People with dark personality traits are better at finding novel ways to cause damage or harm others

Dark Triad
Exercising in nature produces psychological benefits and measurable changes in brain activity

Exercising in nature produces psychological benefits and measurable changes in brain activity

Cognitive Science
People with social anxiety tend to engage in restrictive “safety behaviors” that make them less likable, study finds

People with social anxiety tend to engage in restrictive “safety behaviors” that make them less likable, study finds

Anxiety
Study helps untangle the complicated relationship between psychopathy and emotional awareness

Study helps untangle the complicated relationship between psychopathy and emotional awareness

Psychopathy
People exposed to phubbing by their romantic partner are less satisfied with their romantic relationship

People exposed to phubbing by their romantic partner are less satisfied with their romantic relationship

Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Cognitive Science
  • COVID-19
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Drug Research
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Meditation
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Aviation Psychology and Human Factors
  • Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychedelic Drugs
  • Dark Triad
  • Political Psychology

About

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.