Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Sexism

New study finds link between sexism and denial of male victimhood in relationships

by Eric W. Dolan
July 6, 2025
in Sexism
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

A new study published in Psychology of Men & Masculinities has found that people are more likely to believe myths that minimize or dismiss male victims of intimate partner violence when they also endorse sexist beliefs about men. These beliefs—both hostile and seemingly positive, yet patronizing attitudes toward men—were the strongest predictors of myth acceptance. The study also found that individuals who justified traditional gender roles and those with histories of perpetrating partner violence were more likely to endorse such myths.

While intimate partner violence is commonly portrayed as a problem that overwhelmingly affects women, a growing body of evidence shows that men can also be victims. Yet male victims are often met with skepticism, ridicule, or disbelief. Myths about male victimization—such as the belief that men cannot be abused or that abuse from a woman is not serious—can prevent men from recognizing their experiences as abuse and make it harder for them to seek help. To better understand these misconceptions and the attitudes that underlie them, the researchers developed a new tool: the Intimate Partner Violence Myths Toward Male Victims (IPVMM) Scale.

The study recruited 514 participants—247 men and 266 women—through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. All were U.S. residents and ranged in age, with an average of about 38 years old. Participants were asked to complete a battery of questionnaires, including the new IPVMM scale, which measured beliefs about male victims of partner violence.

The scale included 18 items, some adapted from earlier research on domestic violence myths toward women and others newly written to address specific misconceptions about men. These included statements such as “Men are rarely ever victims of domestic violence,” and “If a man is a victim of domestic abuse, he obviously cannot control his own partner.”

In addition to the IPVMM, participants completed measures of sexism toward both men and women, support for traditional gender hierarchies, and self-reported experiences with either victimization or perpetration of partner violence. These tools included the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, which measures hostile and benevolent sexism toward women, and a similar scale measuring sexism toward men. Hostile sexism includes overtly negative beliefs, like the idea that men are inherently violent or incapable of emotional depth. Benevolent sexism includes statements that seem positive but reinforce stereotypes, such as the belief that men must be strong protectors or providers.

The results showed that endorsement of sexism toward men was the strongest predictor of belief in myths about male victims. Specifically, those who endorsed both hostile and benevolent sexism were much more likely to agree with statements that downplayed or dismissed male victimization. Support for traditional gender roles and systems that justify gender inequality also predicted higher scores on the IPVMM. Interestingly, participants who admitted to perpetrating partner violence were also more likely to endorse these myths, while those who had been victims of such violence were less likely to believe them.

The study’s statistical analyses revealed that the new IPVMM scale had strong internal reliability and was best understood as measuring a single overall construct—belief in myths that deny or minimize male victimization. Endorsement of these myths did not significantly differ between men and women in this sample, which the authors note is somewhat surprising.

Previous research has shown that men tend to score higher than women on scales measuring sexism and victim-blaming attitudes, but in this case, both genders endorsed myths at similar levels. The authors suggest that this could reflect changing social attitudes or that participants may have responded in socially desirable ways to avoid seeming biased.

On average, participants were slightly more likely than not to endorse the myths, scoring above the midpoint of the seven-point scale. This suggests that even in a sample recruited from a general population, rather than a clinical or legal setting, these beliefs are relatively widespread. Notably, these scores were significantly higher than scores on similar scales that measure myths about female victims of domestic violence, pointing to a persistent bias in how male and female victimization is perceived.

The researchers also explored whether individuals’ own experiences with abuse—either as victims or perpetrators—influenced their beliefs. They found that those who had perpetrated partner violence were more likely to believe myths about male victims, although the connection was weaker than that observed with sexist attitudes.

Interestingly, being a victim of partner violence did not significantly predict belief in myths. This challenges assumptions based on social learning theory, which would suggest that personal experience should shape attitudes about abuse. One possibility is that perpetrators may rationalize or minimize their actions by endorsing myths, while victims may still struggle to recognize themselves as such due to internalized gender norms.

Although this study breaks new ground by validating a tool to measure attitudes about male victimization, it has several limitations. The sample, while reasonably large and diverse in age and gender, was mostly White and recruited through an online platform that may not be fully representative of the broader population. There is also the possibility that some participants responded in ways they thought were socially acceptable rather than fully truthful. The cross-sectional design of the study means the researchers could not assess how these attitudes develop or change over time, or whether interventions might shift them.

The authors suggest that future research should continue exploring the IPVMM scale’s reliability in more diverse and representative populations. It would also be valuable to examine how different professional groups—such as police officers, healthcare workers, and domestic violence counselors—respond to male victimization and whether they too endorse these myths. The role of generational differences and cultural background may also be important to investigate. Additionally, exploring these myths in same-sex relationships or among transgender and nonbinary individuals would help broaden understanding of how gendered beliefs shape perceptions of abuse.

The study, “Intimate Partner Violence Myths Toward Male Victims: Exploring Gender, Sexism, and Participant Perpetration and Victimization,” was authored by Brenda Russell, Jennifer M. Cox, and and Haylie Stewart.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Gynandromorph research offers insight into the complexities of male sexual attraction
Sexism

Eye-tracking study shows people fixate longer on female aggressors than male ones

June 23, 2025

People pay more visual attention to female aggressors than male ones, but do not consistently judge their actions as more intentional or blameworthy, suggesting that female aggression is seen as unexpected rather than more morally significant.

Read moreDetails
New research reveals aging shifts gender stereotypes in unexpected ways
Sexism

New research reveals aging shifts gender stereotypes in unexpected ways

May 19, 2025

A new meta-analysis challenges the idea that older women face “double jeopardy” due to age and gender. While younger and middle-aged women are viewed more positively than men, perceptions of older women and men appear to converge in later life.

Read moreDetails
Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men
Cognitive Science

Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men

May 6, 2025

New research shows women underestimate their spatial intelligence, even when they perform just as well as men. This gender gap in self-perception—shaped by personality traits like narcissism and modesty—could help explain why fewer women pursue STEM careers.

Read moreDetails
Changing implicit stereotypes helps men see themselves as more caring
Sexism

Changing implicit stereotypes helps men see themselves as more caring

April 17, 2025

Men may identify more with caring and connection when stereotypes linking these traits to women are disrupted, according to a new study.

Read moreDetails
Neuroticism linked to lower brain volume in individuals unable to adapt themselves to situations in life
Relationships and Sexual Health

New study sheds light on why objectification lowers women’s relationship satisfaction

March 20, 2025

A study finds that women who feel objectified by their partners experience lower personal power, which in turn is linked to reduced relationship satisfaction.

Read moreDetails
Even feminist men can struggle with female proposals, study suggests
Relationships and Sexual Health

Even feminist men can struggle with female proposals, study suggests

March 14, 2025

Marriage norms are shifting, but proposals remain traditional. New research explores women who buck the trend and propose, revealing their experiences and the social reactions they face.

Read moreDetails
Feeling objectified by partner linked to fewer orgasms and more emotional labor for women
Relationships and Sexual Health

Feeling objectified by partner linked to fewer orgasms and more emotional labor for women

March 13, 2025

A new study finds that when women feel objectified by their partner, they report fewer orgasms and greater emotional labor in sex.

Read moreDetails
Men in childcare are seen as less warm, moral, and competent than women
Sexism

Men in childcare are seen as less warm, moral, and competent than women

March 13, 2025

Why are men so underrepresented in childcare? A new study in Sex Roles explores the stereotypes shaping public perceptions of male childcare workers—and how these biases influence support for greater gender diversity in the field.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

Inside the bored brain: Unlocking the power of the default mode network

Choline imbalance in the brain linked to with cognitive symptoms in young depression patients

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

Sedentary time linked to faster brain aging in older adults, study finds

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

New study uncovers a surprising effect of cold-water immersion

Being adopted doesn’t change how teens handle love and dating

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy