Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Brief exposure to conspiracy theories fuels bigoted attitudes that are transferred across groups

by Eric W. Dolan
April 28, 2019
in Social Psychology
(Photo credit: Pavel Losevsky)

(Photo credit: Pavel Losevsky)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

Reading about conspiracy theories can directly increase prejudice and discrimination, according to new research published in the British Journal of Psychology. The study indicates that this prejudice-enhancing effect is not limited to the group targeted by the conspiracy theory.

“Conspiracy theories — which explain events as the result of secret, deliberate actions and cover-ups at the hands of powerful and malevolent groups — have been found to negatively impact individuals and wider society, through the environment, politics, health, and work,” said Daniel Jolley, a senior lecturer in psychology at Staffordshire University and the corresponding author of the new study.

“However, conspiracy theories can also take an intergroup focus, where for example, Jewish people are thought to be acting in plots and schemes. We were interested in our research to explore whether exposure to conspiracy theories that target groups of people (e.g., Jewish people, immigrants) could not only increase belief in those conspiracy theories but lead to increase prejudice and discrimination towards that target group.”

“We feel that understanding the consequences of conspiracy theories is a timely issue, as conspiracy theories are widespread in our society,” Jolley said.

In the study of 453 residents of the United Kingdom, participants were randomly assigned to either read an article that supported a conspiracy theory about minority groups, read an article that refuted the conspiracy theory, or read an article unrelated to conspiracy theories.

For example, one pro-conspiracy article suggested that Israel orchestrated the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center.

Regardless of whether the minority group was Jewish people or Muslim immigrants, the researchers found that reading the pro-conspiracy information was associated with higher levels of prejudicial attitudes towards the targeted group.

Reading the pro-conspiracy information appeared to increase prejudice in general. Participants who read information supporting conspiracy theories against Jews also showed increases in prejudicial attitudes towards Americans, Arabs, the elderly, poor people, and people on social benefits.

“In our study, we found that exposure to conspiracy theories about different social groups increase prejudice towards that group, which can lead to discrimination. Perhaps most importantly, we also demonstrate how the prejudice-enhancing effects of intergroup conspiracy theories are not limited to the group targeted by the conspiracy but can spread to other, uninvolved groups. These issues are therefore not just highly topical, but of great significance for society,” Jolley told PsyPost.

The findings are in line with previous research, which has found that negative contact with a minority group often results in negative attitudes towards that group — and those attitudes are transferred to other minority groups as well.

But like all research, the new study includes some caveats.

“Of course, it is possible that prejudice may also increase belief in conspiracy theories, where conspiracy theories may be the product of a motivated process. Our study does not provide evidence for or against this possibility; we believe a bi-directional relationship is probable. Future research should test this possibility,” Jolley explained.

“In our study, we show that conspiracy theories can have wide-ranging consequences on intergroup relations. One question that research has yet to fully tackle, is how to reduce conspiracy beliefs and prevent these negative consequences. Efforts to reduce prejudice and defuse negative intergroup relations should, therefore, consider the contribution of popular and pervasive conspiracy theories.”

The study, “Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups“, was authored by Daniel Jolley, Rose Meleady, and Karen M. Douglas.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction
Relationships and Sexual Health

New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction

May 9, 2025

Personality traits and perceived power don’t operate the same way in every relationship. A new study suggests that identity and relationship context change how these factors influence satisfaction, challenging long-held assumptions about what makes romantic partnerships work.

Read moreDetails
Narcissism may be fueling political polarization, according to new psychology research
Narcissism

Narcissism may be fueling political polarization, according to new psychology research

May 9, 2025

A new study suggests that narcissistic personality traits—especially feelings of entitlement and antagonism—are strongly linked to political polarization. The findings highlight how psychological tendencies may fuel both loyalty to political in-groups and hostility toward opposing sides.

Read moreDetails
Scientists studied Fox News — here’s what they discovered
Political Psychology

Scientists studied Fox News — here’s what they discovered

May 8, 2025

Fox News, a top-rated cable network since 1996, is known for its conservative commentary and strong influence on public opinion. Researchers have increasingly studied its role in shaping Americans’ views on politics, science, and conspiracy theories.

Read moreDetails
Children’s facial expressions reveal fear response to gender-nonconforming boys, study finds
Social Psychology

Children’s facial expressions reveal fear response to gender-nonconforming boys, study finds

May 8, 2025

A new study using facial recognition software found that children react with subtle fear when shown stories about boys who break gender norms. The findings shed light on early emotional bias against gender-nonconforming peers, especially feminine boys.

Read moreDetails
Online incel forums generate “dark emotional energy” that reinforces toxic group identity
Social Psychology

Online incel forums generate “dark emotional energy” that reinforces toxic group identity

May 8, 2025

Online incel communities maintain their cohesion through repeated exchanges of negative emotion, not positive connection. A new study introduces the idea of “dark emotional energy” to explain how despair and rage serve as bonding rituals in these toxic digital spaces.

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists uncover a fascinating fact about social thinking in the brain

May 7, 2025

Our brains process social similarity in two ways—by comparing people to each other and by comparing them to ourselves. A new study using brain imaging reveals that these forms of person knowledge are represented in separate areas of the brain.

Read moreDetails
Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men
Cognitive Science

Women underestimate their spatial intelligence—even when they perform just as well as men

May 6, 2025

New research shows women underestimate their spatial intelligence, even when they perform just as well as men. This gender gap in self-perception—shaped by personality traits like narcissism and modesty—could help explain why fewer women pursue STEM careers.

Read moreDetails
Women also prefer younger romantic partners, according to a major new psychology study
Dating

Women also prefer younger romantic partners, according to a major new psychology study

May 6, 2025

A new study finds that both men and women are slightly more attracted to younger partners during blind dates, challenging the common belief that only men prioritize youth. These real-world findings reveal a mismatch between people’s stated preferences and actual desire.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Little-known psychedelic drug shows promise in treating low motivation in depression

AI-driven brain training reduces impulsiveness in kids with ADHD, study finds

Neuroscientists use brain implants and AI to map language processing in real time

New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction

Even people who don’t enjoy music still feel the urge to move to it

People with lower cognitive ability more likely to fall for pseudo-profound bullshit

Narcissism may be fueling political polarization, according to new psychology research

Scientists studied Fox News — here’s what they discovered

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy