Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Can you train your brain to unsee optical illusions? Scientists think so

by Martin Doherty and Radoslaw Wincza
May 12, 2025
in Cognitive Science
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Optical illusions are great fun, and they fool virtually everyone. But have you ever wondered if you could train yourself to unsee these illusions? Our latest research suggests that you can.

Optical illusions tell a lot about how people see things. For example, look at the picture below.

[Wikimedia Commons]
The two orange circles are identical, but the one on the right looks bigger. Why?

We use context to figure out what we are seeing. Something surrounded by smaller things is often quite big. Our visual system takes context into account, so it judges the orange circle on the right as bigger than the one on the left.

This illusion was discovered by German psychologist Herman Ebbinghaus in the 19th century. This and similar geometrical illusions have been studied by psychologists ever since.

How much you are affected by illusions like these depends on who you are. For example, women are more affected by the illusion than men – they see things more in context.

Young children do not see illusions at all. To a five-year-old, the two orange circles look the same. It takes time to learn how to use context cues.

Neurodevelopmental conditions similarly affect illusion perception. People with autism or schizophrenia are less likely to see illusions. This is because these people tend to pay greater attention to the central circle, and less to the surrounding ones.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

The culture you grew up in also affects how much you attend to context. Research has found that east Asian perception is more holistic, taking everything into account. Western perception is more analytic, focusing on central objects.

These differences would predict greater illusion sensitivity in east Asia. And true enough, Japanese people seem to experience much stronger effects than British people in this kind of illusion.

This may also depend on environment. Japanese people typically live in urban environments. In crowded urban scenes, being able to keep track of objects relative to other objects is important. This requires more attention to context. Members of the nomadic Himba tribe in the almost uninhabited Namibian desert do not seem to be fooled by the illusion at all.

Gender, developmental, neurodevelopmental and cultural differences are all well established when it comes to optical illusions. However, what scientists did not know until now is whether people can learn to see illusions less intensely.

A hint came from our previous work comparing mathematical and social scientists’ judgements of illusions (we work in universities, so we sometimes study our colleagues). Social scientists, such as psychologists, see illusions more strongly.

Researchers like us have to take many factors into account. Perhaps this makes us more sensitive to context even in the way we see things. But also, it could be that your visual style affects what you choose to study. One of us (Martin) went to university to study physics, but left with a psychology degree. As it happens, his illusion perception is much stronger than normal.

Training your illusion skills

Despite all these individual differences, researchers have always thought that you have no choice over whether you see the illusion. Our recent research challenges this idea.

Radiologists need to be able to rapidly spot important information in medical scans. Doing this often means they have to ignore surrounding detail.

Radiologists train extensively, so does this make them better at seeing through illusions? We found it does. We studied 44 radiologists, compared to over 100 psychology and medical students.

Below is one of our images. The orange circle on the left is 6% smaller than the one on the right. Most people in the study saw it as larger.

Here is another image. Most non-radiologists still saw the left one as bigger. Yet, it is 10% smaller. Most radiologists got this one right.

It was not until the difference was nearly 18%, as shown in the image below, that most non-radiologists saw through the illusion.

Radiologists are not entirely immune to the illusion, but are much less susceptible. We also looked at radiologists just beginning training. Their illusion perception was no better than normal. It seems radiologists’ superior perception is a result of their extensive training.

According to current theories of expertise, this shouldn’t happen. Becoming an expert in chess, for example, makes you better at chess but not anything else. But our findings suggest that becoming an expert in medical image analysis also makes you better at seeing through some optical illusions.

There is plenty left to find out. Perhaps the most intriguing possibility is that training on optical illusions can improve radiologists’ skills at their own work.

So, how can you learn to see through illusions? Simple. Just five years of medical school, then seven more of radiology training and this skill can be yours too.The Conversation

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Previous Post

New research links antidepressant effects of escitalopram to endocannabinoid system changes

Next Post

Psychedelics linked to religious disaffiliation—but not spiritual change—in large-scale study

RELATED

These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

Your breathing pattern is as unique as a fingerprint

April 12, 2026
Vivid close-up of a brown human eye showing intricate iris patterns and details.
Cognitive Science

How different negative emotions change the size of your pupils

April 11, 2026
The surprising way the brain’s dopamine-rich reward center adapts as a romance matures
Cognitive Science

Longitudinal study links associative learning gains to later improvements in fluid intelligence

April 10, 2026
Scientists observe “striking” link between social AI chatbots and psychological distress
Cognitive Science

Why some neuroscientists now believe we have up to 33 senses

April 9, 2026
Casual sex is linked to lower self-esteem and weaker moral orientations in women but not men
Cognitive Science

Fake medicine yields surprisingly real results for older adults’ memory and stress

April 9, 2026
Sorting Hat research: What does your Hogwarts house say about your psychological makeup?
Cognitive Science

Teenage brains process mechanical and academic skills differently across the sexes

April 8, 2026
Your brain might understand music theory better than you think, regardless of formal training
Cognitive Science

Your brain might understand music theory better than you think, regardless of formal training

April 8, 2026
Cognitive Science

Intelligent people are better judges of the intelligence of others

April 6, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds
  • Should your marketing tell a story or state the facts? A massive meta-analysis has answers
  • When brands embrace diversity, some customers pull away — and new research explains why
  • Smaller influencers drive engagement while bigger ones drive purchases, meta-analysis finds
  • Political conservatives are more drawn to baby-faced product designs, and purity values explain why

LATEST

Bladder toxicity risk appears low for psychiatric ketamine patients, though data is limited

Low doses of LSD alter emotional brain responses in people with mild depression

Narcissistic traits are linked to a brain area governing emotional control

Can video games make kids feel better about their bodies?

Reduced gray matter and altered brain connectivity are linked to problematic smartphone use

Your breathing pattern is as unique as a fingerprint

Extreme athletes just helped scientists unlock a deep evolutionary secret about human survival

How different negative emotions change the size of your pupils

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc