Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Conspiracy Theories

Comparison with historical data shows that beliefs in conspiracy theories are not increasing

by Vladimir Hedrih
October 28, 2022
in Conspiracy Theories, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Researchers compared historical data to results of current opinion polls and found no evidence that the percentage of people who believe in conspiracy theories has increased in comparison to previous times. In a series of four studies, they compared results of recent opinion polls on a number of conspiracy theories including those about the origin of the coronavirus pandemic, QAnon and plots to rule the world, beliefs about groups that are conspiring and general conspiracy thinking.

Although there are conspiracy theories that lost popularity recently and others that became more popular, there is no evidence of an overall increase in such beliefs. The same holds for general tendencies towards conspiracy thinking. This series of studies was published in PLOS One.

Beliefs in conspiracy theories have attracted lots of public and media attention in recent years. With 73% of Americans believing that conspiracy theories are currently “out of control” and 59% agreeing that people are more likely to believe them now compared to quarter of a century ago, many scholars view conspiracy theories as an indication of a modern crisis.

However, conspiracy theories change over time. While in previous decades popular conspiracy theories were linked to sightings of UFOs, the origins of the AIDS virus, the purpose of adding fluoride to water and the assassination of president Kennedy, the most novel conspiracy theories are about origins and nature of COVID-19, effects of vaccines and 5G cellphone technology. But have beliefs in conspiracy theories indeed increased over time?

To answer this question, Joseph Uscinski from the University of Miami — a political scientist and a well-known researcher of conspiracy theories — and his colleagues conducted four studies in which they compared historical data to results of recent polls. The data came from a variety of polls organized between 1966 and the present date and many of these have been done or commissioned by the authors of this study themselves. All polls were done on large samples (1000+ participants for most) and using sampling techniques known for having a good likelihood of producing representative samples.

In the first study, the researchers tested the hypothesis that the proportion of people believing conspiracy theories has increased over time. To do that, they first compared percentages of respondents who declared belief in various COVID-19 related conspiracy theories and pieces of misinformation in four opinion polls conducted between March 2020 and May 2021.

In these polls, participants reported their level of agreement with statements such as “Bill Gates is behind the coronavirus pandemic”, “5G cell phone technology is responsible for the spread of the coronavirus” or “Putting disinfectant into your body can prevent or cure COVID-19”. In the next step they conducted similar comparisons for QAnon related beliefs.

For the last part of study 1, authors searched the Roper Center for Public Opinion database, a repository of publicly available polling data in the US, for results of historical surveys on beliefs in conspiracy theories. They identified 37 such questions in polls conducted between 1966 and 2020, and asked the same questions in their own 2021 survey.

What all these results showed is that some conspiracy beliefs became somewhat more popular and some became less popular between compared timepoints, but that no overall increase in the belief in conspiracy theories can be noted.

In study 2, the researchers compared the results of two polls conducted in 2016 and 2018 in six European countries, while study 3 compared answers of respondents of opinion polls conducted in 2012, 2016, 2018 and 2020 about which groups “are conspiring.” Finally, the fourth study tested whether “people have become more conspiracy-minded, in general, over time?” To do that, authors compared assessments of a particular cognitive property called “conspiracy thinking” across eight polls conducted between 2012 and 2021.

None of the results indicated any overall increase in either proportion of people endorsing conspiracy beliefs, nor in the average levels of conspiracy thinking. The authors note, however, that “the average levels of conspiracy thinking are concerning, even though they are not increasing.”

The study, “Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time?”, was authored by Joseph Uscinski, Adam Enders, Casey Klofstad, Michelle Seelig, Hugo Drochon, Kamal Premaratne, and Manohar Murthi.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news
Artificial Intelligence

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

May 23, 2025

Researchers developed a large-scale system that detects political bias in web-based news outlets by examining topic selection, tone, and coverage patterns. The AI tool offers transparency and accuracy—even outperforming large language models.

Read moreDetails
A man and woman laying on a bed
Relationships and Sexual Health

Study uncovers three sexual power profiles—and only one is linked to relationship satisfaction

May 22, 2025

A new study reveals that people with flexible gender beliefs and low interest in dominance are most satisfied in relationships, while those with conflicting views on gender roles report more distress.

Read moreDetails
Scientists uncover potential genetic mechanisms behind the sex bias observed in autism
Political Psychology

Genetic essentialism more common among supporters of radical right-wing parties

May 21, 2025

A new study finds that people who support far-right populist parties in Sweden and Norway are more likely to believe that genes determine social traits, raising concerns about the political implications of genetic essentialism and its links to discrimination.

Read moreDetails
Narcissism negatively predicts partner-enhancement in romantic relationships
Narcissism

Narcissists are more likely to become addicted to social networking sites

May 21, 2025

A study tracking Polish adults over eight months finds that nearly all narcissism types, except sanctity, are tied to social networking site addiction. Some traits even show a bidirectional relationship with addiction symptoms, shedding light on digital-age personality dynamics.

Read moreDetails
New study highlights power—not morality—as key motivator behind competitive victimhood
Social Psychology

New study highlights power—not morality—as key motivator behind competitive victimhood

May 21, 2025

A replication study conducted during the first wave of COVID-19 confirms that need for power, rather than moral concerns, best predicts competitive victimhood in Israeli Arabs and Jews, pointing to deeply rooted motivations in intergroup conflict.

Read moreDetails
Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences
Business

Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences

May 21, 2025

A new study reveals that brain activity, particularly in regions linked to emotion, predicts market preferences more accurately than self-reported choices—especially when samples aren’t demographically representative. Neural signals offered consistent forecasts even when behavioral data failed.

Read moreDetails
Passive scrolling linked to increased anxiety in teens, study finds
Anxiety

Passive scrolling linked to increased anxiety in teens, study finds

May 20, 2025

New research shows that teens who spend more than two hours a day on screens—especially passively scrolling through content—are more likely to report anxiety and emotional or behavioral problems, even when accounting for age, gender, and existing vulnerabilities.

Read moreDetails
Scientists identify distinct brain patterns linked to mental health symptoms
Moral Psychology

Your bodily awareness guides your morality, new neuroscience study suggests

May 20, 2025

Researchers found that interoceptive awareness—the ability to sense internal bodily states—predicts whether people’s moral judgments match group norms. Brain scans revealed that resting-state activity in specific brain regions mediates this relationship.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Judgments of breast attractiveness show surprising consistency across gender, race, and orientation

Neuroscientists challenge “dopamine detox” trend with evidence from avoidance learning

Non-right-handedness is more common across multiple mental health conditions

Withdrawal symptoms are common after stopping antidepressants

Anxious attachment linked to depression spillover in romantic relationships, study finds

Scientists find 16 new Alzheimer’s-linked genes using multi-ancestry genome data

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

Gut bacteria can influence how brain proteins are modified by carbohydrates

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy