Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Contrary to popular opinion, people with higher education level and cognitive ability are not more tolerant

by Vladimir Hedrih
February 9, 2023
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

A 15-year study of young people in Finland found that education level, nonrational thinking, cognitive potential, and cognitive performance were not associated with social intolerance — i.e., intolerance toward different attitudes, lifestyles, cultures, or values of others. On the other hand, higher social intolerance was associated with low flexibility, high perseverance and low persistence. The study was published in Brain and Behavior.

Social intolerance predisposes people to adopt prejudices, negative evaluations or emotional responses towards individuals with different political, religious, sexual or ethnic backgrounds. Prejudices are, in turn, associated with tendencies to discriminate against members of outgroups.

Researchers have proposed various psychological factors as potentially predisposing a person to social intolerance. These factors include the ideologies of parents in childhood, threat perceptions, proneness to anxiety, religious beliefs and personality traits like agreeableness and openness to experience, as well as certain aspects of moral development. Some studies on twins even suggested that genetic factors might play a substantial role in developing social intolerance.

Another factor often seen to be associated with intolerance is lower education. “There is evidence that low educational level, low cognitive abilities, and certain cognitive styles may act as susceptibility factors for development of social intolerance and prejudices,” study authors explain, but note that this evidence has substantial limitations.

This inspired them to conduct a study of their own that used a longitudinal approach to overcome the limitations. The aim of the study was to “investigate the relationship of educational level, cognitive test performance, polygenic cognitive potential, and cognitive styles with social intolerance in adulthood.” They used data from the Young Finns study.

Participants of the study were people born between 1962 and 1977 and they completed first assessments in 1980 when they were between 3-18 years old. The latest assessments were collected in 2012, when participants were 35-50 years old. The total number of participants was 3596 and all were ethnic Finns.

Participants completed assessments of social intolerance in 1997, 2001 and 2012, cognitive styles in 1997, which included distractibility, flexibility, persistence, perseverance, and mystical thinking, cognitive performance in 2011, and socioeconomic factors of participant’s parents in 1980 as well as their own in 2011. Researchers also made assessments of participants’ cognitive potential based on the available genetic data.

Results showed that neither family income level in childhood nor education level of participants or their parents in childhood were associated with social intolerance. On the other hand, participants with high levels of income in adulthood did have a very slightly lower average intolerance level. Results did not show any association between cognitive potential or performance on cognitive tests and social intolerance.

“Regarding practical implications, our study suggests that merely raising educational level or providing cognitive training may not be the most effective ways to reduce social intolerance iWestern countries such as Finland,” the study authors wrote.

Social intolerance was found to be associated with cognitive styles. People who were more intolerant tended to be more distractible and more perseverant, but less persistent and flexible. When the analysis was repeated with controlling for all other factors included in the study, results showed that people who were more intolerant tended to show lower persistence, lower flexibility and higher perseverance.

Persistence is the disposition to continue working toward the goals despite temporary frustration or challenges (e.g., “I usually continue working until I have completed the task”). Flexibility is the ability to adapt one’s behavior to unexpected changes of the situation or circumstances (e.g., “Changes in my plans make me nervous”; “I resist changes in my daily program”). Perseverance is the disposition to repeat a behavior despite changed circumstances, even when that behavior is not appropriate for the new situation and the inability to rethink previous decisions and change behavior accordingly.

“Our findings tentatively suggest that targeting certain cognitive styles (i.e., how an individual processes acquired knowledge) would more effectively diminish social intolerance, if supposing that there might be some causal relationships between cognitive styles and social intolerance,” the researchers said.

The study gives an important contribution to the study of psychological underpinnings of social intolerance. However, the study design does not allow for any cause-and-effect conclusions about the relationships between factors. Additionally, all the participants were ethnic Finns and results on other cultures might be different.

The paper, “Does social intolerance vary according to cognitive styles, genetic cognitive capacity, or education?”, was authored by Aino Saarinen, Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen, Henrik Dobewall, C. Robert Cloninger, Ari Ahola-Olli, Terho Lehtimäki, Nina Hutri-Kähönen, Olli Raitakari, Suvi Rovio, and Niklas Ravaja.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin22ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Infidelity

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

July 3, 2025

The online shaming of unfaithful celebrities is a modern spectacle, but why do some join in while others don't? Researchers exploring this puzzle found a key predictor: a belief in a just world, which unexpectedly dampens outrage and blame.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Social Psychology

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

June 30, 2025

Individuals with higher mortality risk—as judged by actuarial life insurance data—tend to care less about long-term consequences. They show more impulsivity and less future planning, consistent with evolutionary theories that link time horizon to environmental and internal health cues.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy
Evolutionary Psychology

Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy

June 28, 2025

Sugar relationships may be more about sexual attitudes than survival strategies. A new study shows people drawn to these arrangements tend to favor short-term mating, while early-life unpredictability plays only a small role—especially for men.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

Genetic factors may influence how well exercise buffers against childhood trauma

Tips for parents in talking with your kids about your partner’s mental illness

Subjective cognitive struggles strongly linked to social recovery in depression

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

FACT CHECK: Does cheese cause nightmares? Here’s what the science actually says

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy