PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Dark chocolate lovers show higher tolerance for bitterness in chocolate ice cream

by Elsevier
July 24, 2013
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Chocolate ice creamTo make the inherent bitterness of cocoa in chocolate ice cream more palatable, manufacturers add high levels of fat and sugar. Yet, bitterness is an integral part of the complex flavor of chocolate.

In a new study published in the August issue of the Journal of Dairy Science®, investigators report that consumers who prefer dark chocolate in solid form tolerate twice the amount of bitter ingredients in chocolate ice cream than those who prefer milk chocolate. Elimination of some added sugar and fats in chocolate ice cream may be acceptable, and perhaps preferable, to some consumers.

“Our primary goal was to determine whether rejection thresholds for added bitterness in chocolate ice cream could be predicted by individual preferences for solid milk or dark chocolate,” says senior author John E. Hayes, Assistant Professor of Food Science and Director of the Sensory Evaluation Center, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. “Estimating rejection thresholds could be an effective, rapid tool to determine acceptable formulations or quality limits when considering attributes that become objectionable at high intensities.”

The research team produced a control sample of plain chocolate ice cream and samples with varying levels of sucrose octaacetate, a food-safe bitter ingredient used to alter the chocolate ice cream’s bitterness without disturbing other the sensory qualities of the samples, like texture.

These samples were offered in pairs to 96 members of the Penn State community who were non-smokers between the ages of 18 and 45. Forty-six participants preferred milk chocolate. All participants were asked to indicate which of the two blind samples they preferred. They each tasted one spoonful of ten different samples, rinsing with water between pairs.

As expected, the group that preferred solid dark chocolate showed a significantly higher rejection threshold – about twice as high — for sucrose octaacetate in the chocolate ice cream than the group that preferred milk chocolate.

“These results suggest that this approach could be used to make chocolate ice cream with less added sugar to be marketed for dark chocolate lovers, though this needs to be formally tested,” says Dr. Hayes. “Rejection thresholds can also be applied to other dairy foods in quality control or product optimization applications as a means to determine specific concentration limits associated with preferences.”

Further, the research team has demonstrated that the use of the rejection threshold methodology can be used effectively with solid, and not just liquid, foods.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • People who favor dark humor tend to exhibit more problematic personality traits
  • Weight-loss drugs linked to rare eye condition in massive data review
  • The “sense of absence” may explain why disconnected teens turn to addictive behaviors
  • Caffeine might ease anxiety and depression by calming brain inflammation
  • Oxytocin has opposite effects on men’s generosity depending on a their childhood experiences

Science of Money

  • Seven decades of stock forecasts reveal a hidden divide between sophisticated analysts and everyday investors
  • When crypto traders are feeling optimistic, they pay less attention to the economy
  • Shoppers hate skimpflation more than shrinkflation, new research finds
  • When a CEO sounds upbeat, Wall Street analysts tend to follow, even when they shouldn’t
  • When central bank bond-buying pays for itself: A new look at QE’s fiscal scorecard

Recent

  • Shame and fear of false accusations deter male victims of intimate partner violence from seeking help
  • Mitochondrial protein in the brain regulates dietary fat intake and body weight
  • Study sheds light on what makes a location a good place to live
  • New research suggests women strategically use modesty to avoid backlash from female peers
  • Study finds AI chatbots can conduct basic therapy sessions but struggle to adapt to individual needs
  • Large new study reveals the hidden trade-offs of friends with benefits
  • Misjudging personal space drives the need for distance in socially anxious people
  • The physiological reasons the human brain struggles to process information in extreme heat
  • Breaking the law makes people seem less moral, even when the act is unchanged
  • Psychology researchers uncover an unexpected benefit of dance training

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc