PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Artificial Intelligence

Decoding lies with AI? New machine learning model uses facial expressions and pulse rates to detect deception

by Rachel Schepke
July 30, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Researchers from the Tokyo University of Science recently published a study in the journal Artificial Life and Robotics where they explored how machine learning can help detect deception.

Machine learning is a subset of artificial intelligence (AI) that involves the use of algorithms and statistical models to enable computers to learn and improve from experience without being explicitly programmed. In other words, it is a method of teaching computers to perform specific tasks by learning from data, patterns, and examples, rather than relying on pre-defined rules.

Detecting deception can be important in various situations, like questioning crime victims or suspects and interviewing patients with mental health issues. Sometimes, human interviewers might struggle to ask the right questions or spot deception accurately.

To address these challenges, the researchers sought to develop an automated deception detection system using machine learning. The goal was to create a fair and accurate system that would assist interviewees in telling the truth while correctly identifying genuine suspects without wrongly accusing innocent people. The team, consisting of Kento Tsuchiya, Ryo Hatand, and Hiroyuki Nishiyama, focused on using facial expressions and pulse rates to identify deception.

In their study, they collected data from four male graduate students. Instead of using artificial interview scenarios, they took a more natural approach. The subjects were shown random images and asked to freely talk about them while making deceptive statements.

During these interviews, the researchers used a web camera to record the subjects’ facial expressions and a smartwatch to measure their pulse rates. The subjects were instructed to deceive the interviewer as they spoke. After each session, the subjects themselves identified which parts of the recorded video contained deceptive statements.

The researchers employed a machine learning technique called Random Forest (RF) to build the deception detection model. They used all the collected data, including facial expressions and pulse rates, to create a dataset for training the machine learning model.

To assess the model’s performance, they used a 10-fold cross-validation technique. This involved dividing the dataset into ten parts, using nine parts for training, and one part for testing. This process was repeated ten times, and the average performance metrics were calculated, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score (a performance metric that balances precision and recall).

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

The study’s results showed promising performance for the deception detection model. The accuracy and F1 score for each subject ranged from 75% to 80%, with the highest accuracy being around 87%. Some common cues the machine used to detect deception included changes in pulse rate, gaze movements, and specific facial areas around the eyes and mouth.

The researchers believe that their machine learning approach could be a valuable tool for detecting deception in human interactions. However, they noted that “to obtain statistically rigorous results using our approach, we essentially need several thousands of recorded videos and richer sensor data with the help of a huge number of subjects, who might have different cultural backgrounds and neurodivergent statuses, but it was difficult for us. Hence, we restricted our attention to providing some case-study style analysis with the help of few subjects based on the range of our proposed method in the present literature.”

Due to the difficulty in obtaining a vast and diverse dataset, the researchers had to work with limited resources. This restriction might impact the overall strength of their findings and limit the scope of their analysis.

In other words, they needed detailed data from a very large number of people to develop an accurate deception detection system. Due to the difficulty in obtaining a vast and diverse dataset, they focused on doing a smaller study with only a few participants. This limited their analysis but still provided some useful insights that could lay the groundwork for future studies.

The study, “Detecting deception using machine learning with facial expressions and pulse rate“, was authored by Kento Tsuchiya,Ryo Hatano, and Hiroyuki Nishiyama.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Kids’ aggression appears to shape parents’ discipline more than the reverse, study finds
  • One in three teen boys follows Andrew Tate at least a little, and those who do hold more rigid views of manhood
  • Neuroscientists uncover brain clues to why some people with childhood trauma struggle to look forward to things
  • How chronic drinking masks the brain’s hidden scars from childhood trauma
  • A bigger paycheck tends to come with personality changes, according to a large-scale analysis of psychology research

Science of Money

  • Does remote work increase birth rates? Census data points to the opposite
  • France cut the workweek to 35 hours to boost hiring, but new research suggests it failed
  • The hidden psychology behind pro-company misconduct
  • Feeling buried in debt hurts living standards more than the actual math
  • California’s proposed billionaire tax could cost the state billions more than it raises

Recent

  • People with psychosis and a history of aggression are more likely to mistake negative emotions for positive ones
  • Expecting to lose economic standing hurts well-being more than expecting to gain helps it
  • Breast reduction surgery is linked to improved sexual function
  • Emotional struggles are linked to vulnerable narcissism but not grandiose narcissism, meta-analysis finds
  • The psychology behind Taylor Swift’s billion-dollar media empire
  • Psychopathy scores run a bit higher among Americans still living in their home state, study finds
  • Psychologists showed extreme metal fans a series of disgusting images, and their reactions stood out
  • American Catholics reported a greater sense of meaning in life after Pope Leo XIV’s election, study finds
  • When politicians echo white replacement theory, extremist activity rises
  • College-educated people aren’t Big Tech’s biggest fans. They’re its most conflicted, study suggests

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc