Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Democrats and Republicans see each other as “more stupid than evil,” according to new psychology research

by Eric W. Dolan
February 24, 2022
in Political Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Republican and Democratic partisans tend to disparage each other’s intelligence more than each other’s morality, according to new research to be published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. The findings provide new details about political polarization in the United States.

“In recent years, there has been an alarming increase in animosity between political opponents,” said study author Rachel Hartman (@RachelXHartman), a PhD student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and member of the Deepest Beliefs Lab and the Center for the Science of Moral Understanding.

“Many researchers have focused on bridging moral divides between liberals and conservatives to reduce feelings of antipathy, but that seems to assume that the conflict is a moral conflict. I felt that that assumption is worth testing. If the conflict isn’t even about morality, then we might be wasting time trying to get people to see past their differences.”

Across four studies, the researchers found that liberals and conservatives both view each other as more unintelligent than immoral.

Hartman and her colleagues first set out to examine whether perceiving one’s political rivals as unintelligent and perceiving one’s political rivals as immoral were two distinct factors. They recruited 481 Americans from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform and used a statistical technique known as factor analysis to confirm that this was the case.

Next, Hartman and her colleagues investigated how North Carolinians perceived the unintelligence and immorality of liberals and conservatives shortly after a statewide vote on six amendments to the North Carolina constitution in 2018. In the study, 360 North Carolina residents read the six amendments, and were informed that conservatives generally supported the amendments while liberals generally opposed them. The participants were then asked why liberals and conservatives voted the way they did.

Liberal participants were more likely to perceive conservatives as unintelligent and immoral for supporting the amendments, while conservative participants were more likely to perceive liberals as unintelligent and immoral for opposing the amendments. Importantly, however, both liberals and conservatives rated unintelligence as a greater factor than immorality.

For their third study, the research team surveyed a nationally representative sample of 633 Americans. In line with their previous studies, they found that self-identified Democrats and Republicans rated each other as more unintelligent than immoral. Democrats’ judgments of Republicans tended to be more negative than Republicans’ judgments of Democrats.

Hartman and her colleagues also examined meta-perceptions. In their final study, they recruited 176 Americans from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk and asked them to rate how they thought the average Democrat perceived the average Republican and vice versa. Participants accurately thought that Democrats and Republicans viewed each other as more unintelligent than immoral, but they exaggerated the magnitude of disparagement.

“I want to be careful not to overclaim and draw conclusions beyond what we actually tested. Our main finding is that political opponents see each other as more unintelligent than immoral,” Hartman told PsyPost.

“We don’t have the data yet to support any specific recommendations for how people should change the way they engage with political opponents. But dismissing others as being unintelligent, misinformed, or brainwashed seems demeaning and dehumanizing. When you come across someone on the opposite side of an issue, try to communicate your reasons for holding your belief, and listen when they talk about their own reasons.”

“Very smart people can disagree with each other — that’s often a good thing! Having a well-functioning democracy means having a plurality of ideas that people can come together to discuss civilly,” Hartman added.

Like all research, the study includes some limitations. For example, it is unclear how well the findings generalize to political contexts outside the United States. The researchers also noted that is possible that momentous events, such as the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, could significantly alter people’s political perceptions. Future research is also needed to examine ways to effectively reduce polarization.

“As I alluded to above, we haven’t yet taken the next step of applying this work to interventions for reducing animosity,” Hartman said. “There’s some work from our center suggesting that recognizing that people have good reasons for their beliefs reduces animosity, but we would still like to directly test whether we can change perceptions of intelligence and the extent to which doing so is beneficial. It’s also likely that, while political opponents see each other as more stupid than evil overall, there may be particular issues or contexts where that difference goes away, or is even reversed.”

“As psychologists, our work focuses on a psychological understanding of partisan animosity, and the interventions we work with work at the level of changing the way people think about and interact with each other,” Hartman added. “But partisan animosity is a structural problem, and there’s only so much we can do at the individual level. To enact lasting change, our institutions and media environments need to change as well.”

The study, “People See Political Opponents As More Stupid Than Evil”, was authored by Rachel Hartman, Neil Hester, and Kurt Gray.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New study suggests Donald Trump’s “fake news” attacks are backfiring
Political Psychology

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

July 5, 2025

Why has politics become so personal? The answers may lie in our minds. These 13 studies from the new science of political behavior reveal the hidden psychological forces—from personality to primal fear—that are driving us further apart.

Read moreDetails
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Political Psychology

Despite political tensions, belief in an impending U.S. civil war remains low

July 4, 2025

A new national survey finds that only a small fraction of Americans believe civil war is likely or necessary.

Read moreDetails
Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails
Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders
Authoritarianism

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

June 20, 2025

A new study suggests that the way people learn to trust others early in life can shape their political ideology and preference for strong, dominant leaders—though not directly, but through dogmatic thinking and broader political attitudes.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Othello syndrome: Woman’s rare stroke leads to psychotic delusions of infidelity

How to protect your mental health from a passive-aggressive narcissist

Dark personality traits linked to generative AI use among art students

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

People with depression face significantly greater social and health-related challenges

Stress disrupts gut and brain barriers by reducing key microbial metabolites, study finds

New research reveals hidden biases in AI’s moral advice

7 subtle signs you are being love bombed—and how to slow things down before you get hurt

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy