![[Adobe Stock]](https://sp-ao.shortpixel.ai/client/to_webp,q_glossy,ret_img,w_750,h_375/https://www.psypost.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/sad-depressed-man-in-bedroom-750x375.jpg)
A new study published in the Journal of Affective Disorders has found that disruptions in daily activity and light exposure patterns are linked to an increased risk of depression. Researchers analyzed data from over 6,800 American adults and discovered that people with unstable daily rhythms and greater fluctuations in activity and light exposure were more likely to experience depressive symptoms. On the other hand, those with more consistent daily patterns had a significantly lower risk of depression.
The study was conducted to better understand how disruptions in the body’s natural daily cycles contribute to mental health problems. Previous research has shown that people with depression often have irregular sleep-wake cycles, reduced daytime activity, and disturbances in their circadian rhythm—the internal clock that regulates sleep, alertness, and various biological processes over a 24-hour period.
However, most prior studies focused on only one aspect of these daily patterns, such as sleep duration or nighttime light exposure. The researchers wanted to explore multiple aspects of daily rhythm, including both activity levels and light exposure, to see how their stability and fluctuations relate to depression risk. Given the increasing prevalence of depression and the modern lifestyle factors that contribute to disrupted daily rhythms, they aimed to provide insights that could inform future prevention and treatment strategies.
To conduct the study, the researchers analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey collected between 2011 and 2014. A total of 6,852 adults were included in the analysis. Participants wore a wrist-worn activity monitor for seven consecutive days, which recorded both movement and light exposure.
Using this data, researchers assessed three key aspects of daily rhythm: interdaily stability (which measures how consistent a person’s activity and light exposure patterns are from day to day), intradaily variability (which measures how fragmented and irregular these patterns are within a single day), and relative amplitude (which measures the strength of a person’s daily rhythm, comparing their most active and least active periods). Depression symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, a widely used screening tool for depressive symptoms.
The results showed strong associations between daily rhythm disruptions and depression risk. People with greater intradaily variability—meaning their activity or light exposure fluctuated unpredictably throughout the day—were significantly more likely to experience depressive symptoms. In contrast, people with higher interdaily stability and relative amplitude, meaning they had a more regular, predictable daily routine and a clear distinction between active and inactive periods, had a much lower risk of depression.
Specifically, individuals in the highest tertile of rhythm stability had a significantly reduced likelihood of depression compared to those with the most irregular rhythms. The findings were consistent for both rest-activity rhythms (daily movement patterns) and light exposure rhythms, suggesting that maintaining a stable and structured daily pattern in both domains may be important for mental health.
The study also identified differences in how these factors affected different groups of people. Younger adults were particularly sensitive to fragmented activity patterns, while men were more affected by irregular light exposure rhythms than women. Additionally, people with a lower body mass index appeared to benefit more from strong light exposure rhythms in terms of depression risk reduction. These findings suggest that the relationship between daily rhythm disruptions and depression may vary based on demographic and biological factors.
Despite its strengths, the study has some limitations. Because it was cross-sectional, it could not determine whether rhythm disruptions cause depression or whether depression leads to more irregular daily patterns. Additionally, the study relied on a seven-day monitoring period, which may not fully capture long-term patterns in an individual’s daily rhythm. The use of a self-reported depression scale also introduces the possibility of response bias.
Future research could explore these associations using longitudinal studies to track changes in daily rhythms and mental health over time. Investigating whether interventions that stabilize daily activity and light exposure can reduce depression risk would also be valuable.
The study, “Associations between rest–activity/light-exposure rhythm characteristics and depression in United States adults: A population-based study,” was authored by Yundan Liao, Wei Zhang, Shixue Chen, Xiaoxu Wu, Keyi He, Maoyang Wang, Yuanqi Lan, and Fang Qi.
