PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

GOP’s midterm hopes faltered as abortion outranked economy among key voters, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
November 4, 2024
Reading Time: 3 mins read
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

In the aftermath of the 2022 Congressional midterm elections, political analysts were surprised by the Democratic Party’s performance, which contradicted predictions of a strong Republican showing. A recent study published in the journal PLOS One presents evidence that voters were notably influenced by the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. The findings indicate that issue of abortion became a focal point in the midterms, helping Democrats attract swing voters, including Republicans in key races.

Historically, the president’s party usually loses seats during midterms, particularly when economic conditions are poor and the president’s approval ratings are low. In 2022, despite high inflation and President Biden’s relatively low approval ratings, Democrats held on to more seats than anticipated.

“Experts and scholars were generally convinced that the Democratic Party was poised to suffer defeats similar to what the President’s party experienced in the 2018, 2014, 2010, and 2006 midterm elections,” the study authors explained. “However, the actual election results caught pundits and scholars off guard. The Democratic Party only lost nine seats in the House of Representatives and managed to gain one seat in the Senate.”

Recognizing the need to understand what caused this deviation, the researchers sought to identify factors that may have influenced voting behavior beyond economic and presidential approval metrics. They were particularly interested in whether a single issue, like abortion, could sway voter decisions in a way that traditional models couldn’t predict.

The research team conducted a survey with 2,109 registered voters across the United States. This survey was conducted immediately after the 2022 midterm elections and focused on voters’ political preferences, party identification, and the significance they attached to various issues, such as the economy, immigration, crime, and abortion. By using a structured survey with a national sample, the researchers were able to obtain data that represented a diverse set of opinions and demographics.

Voters were asked not only whom they voted for but also which issues they felt were significant in their decision-making process. One of the key questions examined the importance of abortion in voters’ choices, particularly in light of the recent Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which removed federal protections for abortion rights by overturning Roe v. Wade. This focus allowed researchers to determine whether the court’s decision had heightened the issue’s importance for persuadable voters—especially Independents and Republicans who might not typically prioritize abortion.

The study found that abortion was indeed a decisive factor in persuading voters who typically are not strongly aligned with a particular political party. For Independent voters in particular, abortion emerged as a leading issue influencing support for Democratic candidates, marking a shift in voting patterns. The researchers observed that many persuadable voters, including Independents and some Republicans, were drawn to Democratic candidates as they prioritized the protection of abortion rights.

By comparing this midterm data to a similar survey conducted after the 2020 presidential election, the researchers found that abortion’s role in 2022 voting was significantly more prominent. Before the Dobbs decision, abortion was a much less influential issue. After the ruling, the topic gained significant importance among voters who were concerned about the potential rollback of reproductive rights.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

In terms of issue prioritization, abortion ranked closely with other traditionally high-priority issues such as crime and the economy, but it was particularly impactful among persuadable voters. The study also found that while economic factors remained a consistent concern, they did not have as much of an influence on voting behavior in 2022 as the issue of abortion did. This finding challenges the idea that midterm elections are mainly referendums on the economy and presidential performance.

“In the lead-up to the midterm elections, Republican leaders asserted that abortion would not be the determining factor for voters, emphasizing that crime and inflation would hold greater significance in the minds of the electorate,” the researchers wrote. “Nevertheless, our research uncovers a different reality, demonstrating that abortion, alongside crime and immigration, played a vital role in shaping the decisions of Independent voters. Particularly noteworthy was the substantial increase in the impact of the abortion issue compared to previous elections. In contrast, inflation emerged as a less dependable predictor of Independent voters’ choices, offering only ambiguous signals in comparison to the other issues.”

As with all research, there are limitations. Since the research relied on survey data, the team was dependent on participants accurately reporting their voting behavior and motivations. Additionally, the sample was collected online, which might affect the representativeness of the data if online respondents differ from the general population in terms of political engagement.

Looking ahead, researchers suggest that future studies could explore the influence of specific issues in even greater depth, particularly in elections with similar unexpected outcomes. They propose that subsequent research could analyze other factors, like social media and campaign messaging, which may also amplify the importance of certain issues during elections.

The study, “Persuadable voters decided the 2022 midterm: Abortion rights and issues-based frameworks for studying election outcomes,” was authored by Claudia Kann, Daniel Ebanks, Jacob Morrier, and R. Michael Alvarez.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Adults with ADHD who struggle to manage emotions face a higher insomnia risk
  • New study explores the psychological chain behind involuntary sexual thoughts
  • Narcissistic individuals are more prone to problematic use of generative AI
  • Wealth and air pollution emerge as top predictors of state autism rates
  • Scientists develop a groundbreaking vaccine that outsmarts illicit fentanyl analogs

Science of Money

  • Do 10-second ads work? A study finds shorter can mean stickier
  • What the 2021–2024 unauthorized immigration boom did to U.S. jobs, rents, and welfare spending
  • The “halo effect”: The face in the photo shapes your opinion of the outfit
  • Why some countries embraced remote work and others didn’t
  • What makes a salesperson persuasive? A survey explores how communication skills shape buying decisions

Recent

  • Neuroscientists find a teamwork paradox: highly synchronized brains perform worse at complex tasks
  • How different types of exercise impact mood and brain chemistry
  • Exposure to high temperatures during pregnancy is linked to slower thalamic growth in children
  • Brain structure variations are linked to different types of traumatic memories
  • New research warns of a looming partisan battle over artificial intelligence
  • Irregular daily rhythms and childhood trauma predict teen depression and anxiety
  • Donald Trump and Hunter Biden convictions shed light on the mental gymnastics of political scandals
  • Autistic brains show differences in a fetal fold linked to social cognition
  • Believing in hell is linked to fewer casual sexual encounters, study finds
  • Study finds complex association between dietary fat intake and brain atrophy in older adults

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc