Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Intimacy — but not insecurity — predicts relationship breakups, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
August 18, 2020
in Social Psychology
(Photo credit: rocketclips)

(Photo credit: rocketclips)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Boosting intimacy may be more important for maintaining long-lasting romantic relationships than reducing insecurities, according to new research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science.

“When we think about the question ‘why do couples break up?’ what we easily and mostly think of are some ‘negative’ events and feelings such as cheating, lying, fights and insecurities,” explained study author Yoo Bin Park, a PhD student at the University of Toronto and member of the MacDonald Social Psychology Research Lab.

“However, our team has been generally interested in the important role the ‘positives,’ and in particular feelings of intimacy, play in relationship maintenance. So we decided to address that question in a prospective study with participants currently involved in a relationship.”

The researchers recruited 4,105 adults and had them complete weekly surveys regarding their relationship until they broke up. Of the initial sample, 111 participants completed a 27-day daily diary study following their breakup and 76 of these participants also completed a follow-up survey one month after the conclusion of the daily diary study.

After controlling for gender, age, and relationship length, Park and her colleagues found that perceived intimacy predicted whether or not participants continued to stay with their partner.

Specifically, participants who disagreed with statements such as “It’s interesting to learn more about my partner”, “Being with my partner gives me opportunities for personal growth”, and “I enjoy sharing things about myself with my partner” tended to have shorter relationships. This was true even when the researchers accounted for other factors such as relationship satisfaction and attachment insecurities.

Surprisingly, the researchers found that concerns about negative evaluations (“I worry about what my partner thinks about me”) did not appear to significantly predict breakups.

“Especially for anyone who is thinking ‘something’s missing in my relationship,’ I think they should take away from this study that it might be the intimate connections that they are missing and they should do something about it rather than overlooking its importance just because it doesn’t come across as serious a red flag as frequent quarrels would, for example,” Park told PsyPost.

“Oftentimes, couples drift apart not necessarily because they hate each other but because they get used to and take for granted the reward they get from connecting with their partner. Intimate connection is more than a relationship luxury and may in fact be crucial to relationship longevity, so investing some time and efforts to experiencing that will be worth it.”

The researchers also found that perceived intimacy was unrelated to postbreakup attachment to an ex-partner, which could be because of how memories function.

“Just as specific details of an event or information are lost over time and only a global meaning or summary is retained, memories from the previous relationship that are left to affect postbreakup outcomes may be a global sense of how satisfying or positive the relationship experience was rather than specific aspects of the relationship,” the researchers said.

As with any study, the new research includes some caveats.

“We didn’t look at the partner’s part of the story in this research. It’s possible that the relationship one partner considers as sufficiently intimate is not at all fulfilling the other partner’s needs for intimacy,” Park said.

“So I think it’ll be important and interesting to look at how both partners’ level of intimacy contribute to the breakup decisions — is one partner’s lack of intimacy enough to fail a relationship or would the relationship survive if there’s at least one partner perceiving enough intimacy in their relationship?”

The study, “Lack of Intimacy Prospectively Predicts Breakup“, was authored by Yoobin Park, Emily A. Impett, Stephanie S. Spielmann, Samantha Joel, and Geoff MacDonald.

RELATED

Fetuses show preference for face-like patterns
Parenting

U.S. sees 5.7 million more childless women than expected, fueling a “demographic cliff”

September 17, 2025
Autistic individuals and those with social anxiety differ in how they experience empathy, new study suggests
Political Psychology

Higher cognitive ability and other psychological factors predict support for free speech

September 17, 2025
New study identifies sexual frustration as a significant factor in mass shootings
Racism and Discrimination

New study finds strong links between prejudice and support for political violence in the United States

September 16, 2025
The way you blink reveals how music is shaping your attention, new study finds
Evolutionary Psychology

Women often display more aggression than men toward their siblings, large global study finds

September 16, 2025
Both-sidesism debunked? Study finds conservatives more anti-democratic, driven by two psychological traits
Authoritarianism

New paper unpacks how Trump uses “strategic victimhood” to justify retaliation

September 15, 2025
Psychology researchers identify a “burnout to extremism” pipeline
Business

Psychology researchers identify a “burnout to extremism” pipeline

September 15, 2025
Want less conflict in your relationship? Try this simple perspective shift
Relationships and Sexual Health

“Love doesn’t thrive on ledgers”: Keeping score in relationships foreshadows decline, study finds

September 14, 2025
Study uncovers a gendered double standard for interracial relationships
Attachment Styles

Attachment insecurity shapes mentalization in interracial long-distance relationships

September 13, 2025

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New research finds the cumulative weight of social hardship across a lifespan shapes the aging brain

U.S. sees 5.7 million more childless women than expected, fueling a “demographic cliff”

AI hate speech detectors show major inconsistencies, new study reveals

New study sheds light on how sexual self-disclosure relates to relationship quality

Brain scan study connects parahippocampal cortex thinning with depression and neuroticism

People experiencing manic episodes have measurably higher skin temperatures

Higher cognitive ability and other psychological factors predict support for free speech

Autistic individuals and those with social anxiety differ in how they experience empathy, new study suggests

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy