PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Love isn’t blind: Romantic partners are fairly accurate judges of their better half’s abilities, study indicates

by Emily Manis
August 10, 2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Have you ever heard someone say that their significant other knows them better than they know themselves? A study published in the Journal of Research in Personality suggests that though that may not be true, romantic partners are generally just as accurate about their partners abilities as their partners are about their own abilities.

Feedback on our abilities from people close to us can be useful since our own perceptions may not always be fully accurate. Previous research has focused on the accuracy of self-perception and different factors that influence our perceptions of others. Self-other knowledge asymmetry, or SOKA, is a model that identifies four categories for traits: open area, blind spot, hidden area, and unknown area.

Open area traits are judged accurately by oneself and others, blind spots are only accurately judged by others, hidden area traits are only accurately judged by oneself, and unknown area is not appropriately judged by either. This study sought to understand the difference in accuracy between oneself, a romantic partner, a close friend, and an acquaintance.

For their study, Gabriela Hofer and colleagues utilized a sample of 238 participants between the ages of 18 and 45 who were recruited over social media, on-campus, and from mailing lists. Participants had to speak German and be in a romantic relationship of at least 6 months.

For each participant, data was collected from themselves, their significant other, their closest friend, and an acquaintance. Participants completed measures on intelligence, creativity, and emotional abilities. Participants and their chosen companions filled out estimates of ability.  Participants were also asked to assess the closeness of their relationships.

Results indicated that people were able to predict their own abilities to a moderately accurate degree. The participants’ romantic partners were able to predict the abilities of the participant with a similar level of accuracy. “All in all, it appears that the increased interpersonal intimacy between partners and targets—as compared to other informants—might not necessarily be detrimental when it comes to accuracy,” the researchers said.

Surprisingly, participants did not overestimate their abilities, but rather were more likely to underestimate themselves. People were especially able to accurately judge their own abilities when it came to numerical intelligence. Romantic partners were more accurately able to predict their partners abilities in every single domain measured compared to close friends or acquaintances. Romantic partners were able to shed somewhat accurate insight into intrapersonal skills of the participant, which the other groups were not.

This study took important steps into understanding the accuracy of self and other’s perceptions, there are limitations to be aware of. One such limitation is that the sample was smaller than originally targeted due to complications from COVID-19. Additionally, there are many different types of acquaintances, such as work friends or friends of friends, and it is possible their accuracy would differ due to nuances of the relationship.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“This study’s results suggest that people we are very well-acquainted with—like our closest friends or our partners—can provide at least moderately accurate assessments of a variety of our cognitive and non-cognitive abilities,” the researchers concluded. “Both types of sources might also be able to provide us with information about our abilities that we ourselves have no access to. In that, our partners also do not appear to idealize our abilities—at least not more than our close friends or acquaintances.”

“Indeed, people who we have just met or who we only interact with in very specific contexts—like at work or at university—are likely less accurate in their perceptions of our abilities. Our own knowledge of our abilities can be considered moderate across many areas and even high in the domain of numerical intelligence. Despite all that, the associations between our own and different types of others’ perceptions of our abilities and our actual standing on the same abilities are far from perfect. Thus, when we really want to know how well we are doing in a domain, our best option likely remains to take psychometrically sound performance tests.”

The study, “Love is not blind: What romantic partners know about our abilities compared to ourselves, our close friends, and our acquaintances“, was authored by Gabriela Hofer, Silvia Macher, and Aljoscha C. Neubauer.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Breathing exercises blunt the body’s physical reaction to acute stress
  • How sexual arousal distorts men’s perception of women’s boundaries
  • Early giftedness rarely lasts into adulthood, large developmental study finds
  • Scientists identify 19 core dimensions of positive mental health in new consensus study
  • Brain imaging study links childhood trauma to chronic procrastination in adulthood

Science of Money

  • Adding a human to oversee AI doesn’t automatically build trust, study finds
  • The networking blind spot that could be holding back your next big product
  • Did voters punish inflation or pay cuts? A county-by-county look at the 2024 election
  • Can criticism be a sign of brand loyalty? A study of gaming communities says yes
  • What a brainwave headset revealed about why some traders make money and others don’t

Recent

  • Women globally place higher importance on moral identity than men
  • Fluid brain circuits drive the formation of cocaine habits
  • Scientists found a subtle social cue that reveals your choices
  • Could a simple supplement combo help adolescents with ADHD stay on task?
  • Brief smartphone check-ins can forecast the return of psychotic symptoms
  • Neuroscientists uncover a universal mechanism for human decision making
  • Genetic data indicates distinct metabolic pathways for different mental health disorders
  • Breathing exercises blunt the body’s physical reaction to acute stress
  • Higher body fat in pregnancy may influence child ADHD risk through inflammation
  • Daily, but not weekly, psilocin mucate lowers cortisol and anxiety in stressed rats

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc