PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Love isn’t blind: Romantic partners are fairly accurate judges of their better half’s abilities, study indicates

by Emily Manis
August 10, 2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Have you ever heard someone say that their significant other knows them better than they know themselves? A study published in the Journal of Research in Personality suggests that though that may not be true, romantic partners are generally just as accurate about their partners abilities as their partners are about their own abilities.

Feedback on our abilities from people close to us can be useful since our own perceptions may not always be fully accurate. Previous research has focused on the accuracy of self-perception and different factors that influence our perceptions of others. Self-other knowledge asymmetry, or SOKA, is a model that identifies four categories for traits: open area, blind spot, hidden area, and unknown area.

Open area traits are judged accurately by oneself and others, blind spots are only accurately judged by others, hidden area traits are only accurately judged by oneself, and unknown area is not appropriately judged by either. This study sought to understand the difference in accuracy between oneself, a romantic partner, a close friend, and an acquaintance.

For their study, Gabriela Hofer and colleagues utilized a sample of 238 participants between the ages of 18 and 45 who were recruited over social media, on-campus, and from mailing lists. Participants had to speak German and be in a romantic relationship of at least 6 months.

For each participant, data was collected from themselves, their significant other, their closest friend, and an acquaintance. Participants completed measures on intelligence, creativity, and emotional abilities. Participants and their chosen companions filled out estimates of ability.  Participants were also asked to assess the closeness of their relationships.

Results indicated that people were able to predict their own abilities to a moderately accurate degree. The participants’ romantic partners were able to predict the abilities of the participant with a similar level of accuracy. “All in all, it appears that the increased interpersonal intimacy between partners and targets—as compared to other informants—might not necessarily be detrimental when it comes to accuracy,” the researchers said.

Surprisingly, participants did not overestimate their abilities, but rather were more likely to underestimate themselves. People were especially able to accurately judge their own abilities when it came to numerical intelligence. Romantic partners were more accurately able to predict their partners abilities in every single domain measured compared to close friends or acquaintances. Romantic partners were able to shed somewhat accurate insight into intrapersonal skills of the participant, which the other groups were not.

This study took important steps into understanding the accuracy of self and other’s perceptions, there are limitations to be aware of. One such limitation is that the sample was smaller than originally targeted due to complications from COVID-19. Additionally, there are many different types of acquaintances, such as work friends or friends of friends, and it is possible their accuracy would differ due to nuances of the relationship.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“This study’s results suggest that people we are very well-acquainted with—like our closest friends or our partners—can provide at least moderately accurate assessments of a variety of our cognitive and non-cognitive abilities,” the researchers concluded. “Both types of sources might also be able to provide us with information about our abilities that we ourselves have no access to. In that, our partners also do not appear to idealize our abilities—at least not more than our close friends or acquaintances.”

“Indeed, people who we have just met or who we only interact with in very specific contexts—like at work or at university—are likely less accurate in their perceptions of our abilities. Our own knowledge of our abilities can be considered moderate across many areas and even high in the domain of numerical intelligence. Despite all that, the associations between our own and different types of others’ perceptions of our abilities and our actual standing on the same abilities are far from perfect. Thus, when we really want to know how well we are doing in a domain, our best option likely remains to take psychometrically sound performance tests.”

The study, “Love is not blind: What romantic partners know about our abilities compared to ourselves, our close friends, and our acquaintances“, was authored by Gabriela Hofer, Silvia Macher, and Aljoscha C. Neubauer.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Mapping the dark triad: Which countries have the most narcissistic and manipulative populations?
  • Study finds unpredictable childhood environments are linked to borderline personality traits in adulthood
  • Is intelligence related to happiness?
  • Anti-democratic attitudes are highly contagious, new psychology study finds
  • How the brain shifts gears to appreciate the beauty of poetry

Science of Money

  • New study blames authoritarian bosses for the quiet quitting trend
  • Three types of older jobseekers, three very different odds of getting hired
  • Can AI read the market’s mood? Researchers test DeepSeek sentiment scores against Shanghai stock returns
  • Do glowing words really sell? An economist finds a small but real puffery effect on Airbnb
  • Error tolerance: entrepreneurship booster or societal risk?

Recent

  • Internal expectations, not actual posts, drive how narcissists view their social media success
  • Female biology professors are now more likely to have a Wikipedia page than their male peers
  • Artificial intelligence reveals subtle movement differences in autistic toddlers
  • Adults with depression show a negative attentional bias, but new research suggests it is highly task-specific
  • Physically compressing peoples’ torsos reduces the riskiness of their decisions, study finds
  • The surprising disconnect between intense romance and a couple’s sex life
  • Does going to religious services actually improve your mental health?
  • Specific cognitive skills rival general intelligence in predicting socioeconomic success
  • Jealousy increases men’s support for feminine honor norms, study finds
  • Prenatal THC exposure drives teenage binge drinking in female rats

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc