Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive COVID-19

Multi-country study suggests that the psychological burden of COVID-19 has led to increased political unrest

by Beth Ellwood
August 31, 2021
in COVID-19, Political Psychology
(Photo credit: Geoff Livingston)

(Photo credit: Geoff Livingston)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

New findings published in the journal Psychological Science suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to upsurges of political unrest in many countries. The two-wave study surveyed residents of the United States, Italy, Denmark, and Hungary and found that the perceived psychological burden of COVID-19 was associated with increased antisystemic attitudes and stronger intentions to participate in political violence.

The year 2020 was marked by a coronavirus pandemic that shook the entire globe and was nothing short of catastrophic. At the same time, countries around the world faced an unusual number of demonstrations — some related to the pandemic, and others not. Some scholars have suggested that the COVID-19 crisis is partly responsible for this increased civil unrest, although limited evidence has emerged to support this claim.

Study authors Henrikas Bartusevičius and his colleagues describe a psychological pathway linking the mental burden of COVID-19 to anti-government attitudes. The researchers explain that the pandemic posed a significant threat to citizens’ financial, physical, and mental well-being and that these conditions may have led to increased feelings of social marginalization. This marginalization may have then led to aggression and rebellion against existing societal structures.

To explore this theory, Bartusevičius and his team distributed a two-wave survey among citizens from four different countries: the United States, Italy, Denmark, and Hungary. Notably, these countries differed in the extent they were affected by COVID-19 and the extent they were politically polarized. In April 2020, 6,131 people completed the first survey, and in June/July 2020, 4,568 completed a second survey.

The questionnaires assessed intentions to partake in peaceful political activism and political violence and additionally asked participants whether they had participated in any protests or political violence. The U.S. sample was additionally asked whether they had participated in the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests or counterprotests. The perceived COVID-19 Burden Scale was used as a measure of the perceived physical and mental health burden associated with the pandemic.

Across all four countries, the researchers found that perceived COVID-19 burden was associated with both intentions to engage in political violence and self-reports of having engaged in political violence. Among the U.S. sample, COVID-19 burden was also associated with the use of violence during the BLM protests and counterprotests (e.g., engaging in the destruction of property, engaging in physical confrontations with other citizens).

There was less evidence to suggest that COVID-19 burden was linked to peaceful activism. Only in Denmark and Hungary was COVID-19 burden related to nonviolent activism. In the U.S., COVID-19 burden was neither tied to participation in BLM protests nor protests against rioting and looting.

The researchers say it is possible that the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic stirred antigovernment attitudes and increased anger among already marginalized groups, arousing collective action. At the same time, lockdowns likely increased the perception that the government maintains power over citizens, which may have led citizens to feel powerless to create political change. These frustrations may have culminated in violent rather than peaceful demonstrations.

“Our findings constitute a reminder that the COVID-19 pandemic is an all-out crisis, carrying effects far beyond the domain of health . . . It is key to also repair the relationship between citizens and the political system,” Bartusevičius and his colleagues write.

The study authors acknowledge that the four countries they studied were Western, educated, industrialized, wealthy, and democratic and that the results do not generalize to less developed countries. They say that the countries they studied all have strong economies and political structures and countries without these conditions may have experienced even greater unrest in response to the pandemic.

The study, “The Psychological Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Associated With Antisystemic Attitudes and Political Violence”, was authored by Henrikas Bartusevičius, Alexander Bor, Frederik Jørgensen, and Michael Bang Petersen.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New study suggests Donald Trump’s “fake news” attacks are backfiring
Political Psychology

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

July 5, 2025

Why has politics become so personal? The answers may lie in our minds. These 13 studies from the new science of political behavior reveal the hidden psychological forces—from personality to primal fear—that are driving us further apart.

Read moreDetails
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Political Psychology

Despite political tensions, belief in an impending U.S. civil war remains low

July 4, 2025

A new national survey finds that only a small fraction of Americans believe civil war is likely or necessary.

Read moreDetails
Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
COVID-19

Frequent dreams and nightmares surged worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic

July 1, 2025

An international study of over 15,000 adults across 16 countries found that dream recall and nightmares became more common during the pandemic, with sleep duration, age, and gender all playing a role in how often people experienced them.

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

People with depression face significantly greater social and health-related challenges

Stress disrupts gut and brain barriers by reducing key microbial metabolites, study finds

New research reveals hidden biases in AI’s moral advice

7 subtle signs you are being love bombed—and how to slow things down before you get hurt

A simple breathing exercise enhances emotional control, new research suggests

Despite political tensions, belief in an impending U.S. civil war remains low

Girls are better than boys at detecting their own ADHD symptoms

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy