Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Artificial Intelligence

New research reveals how basic psychological needs influence attitudes towards artificial intelligence

by Eric W. Dolan
July 28, 2023
in Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

New research published in Telematics and Informatics provides evidence that the fulfillment of basic psychological needs through technology use is linked to changes in attitudes towards artificial intelligence over time. The findings indicate that self-determination, particularly feelings of competence and relatedness, plays a crucial role in shaping both negative and positive attitudes towards this emerging technology.

“We live in a world where artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more common and accessible than ever. People’s attitudes towards AI will most certainly have a huge effect on how fast and widely AI can spread in society and how the development of AI will turn out,” said study author Jenna Bergdahl, a researcher at the Emerging Technologies Lab at Tampere University.

“As a researcher, I work in the Emerging Technologies Lab at Tampere University, where we are particularly interested in the new technological forms of life that constantly challenge and transform human and post-human living. Two projects from the Emerging Technologies Lab, called UrbanAI and Self & Technology, are focusing especially on artificial intelligence in society and conducting cross-national social psychological research on human-technology interaction.”

“The Emerging Technologies Lab has a relatively long history of researching these topics and working on these projects, which has enabled us to identify a research gap,” Bergdahl explained. “Our study is the first to examine associations between basic psychological needs and attitudes toward AI. Furthermore, there was a lack of cross-national and longitudinal research on this topic, especially during this time when AI is becoming more important in all domains of life.”

The researchers conducted two studies to understand how people’s attitudes towards AI are influenced by their basic psychological needs and experiences with technology.

In the first study, they surveyed 8,806 people from different countries (Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and Poland) to gather their opinions about AI. Participants were asked about their attitudes towards AI using a scale that included both positive and negative statements. For example, they were asked to rate how much they agreed or disagreed with statements like “much of society will benefit from a future full of Artificial Intelligence” and “I think Artificial Intelligence is dangerous.” The researchers measured both positive and negative attitudes towards AI separately.

The researchers also asked about the participants about use of different smart technologies, such as smart robots, virtual assistants, and wearable smart devices. Finally, they assessed three psychological needs: autonomy (feeling in control of their actions), competence (feeling capable of using technology effectively), and relatedness (feeling connected to others through technology).

The findings from the first study showed that when people felt more competent in using technology and had a sense of relatedness with others through technology, they tended to have more positive attitudes towards AI. Likewise, when people’s autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs were met, they had fewer negative attitudes towards AI.

“We discovered that competence and relatedness were associated with AI positivity in all six countries,” Bergdahl told PsyPost. “This suggests that individuals who feel competent in using new technologies and have a sense of connection with other technology users tend to perceive AI more positively across these countries. The results indicate that experiencing competence and relatedness in relation to new technologies is linked to fewer negative attitudes towards them, particularly concerning AI.”

Additionally, they found that the relationship between these needs and attitudes towards AI can vary slightly depending on the country’s context and the participants’ exposure to technology.

“Notably, autonomy was only associated with AI positivity in Finland,” Bergdahl explained. “Contextual factors likely play a significant role in shaping Finnish participants’ views. Finland’s high ranking in digitalization and digital performance in Europe, according to the European Commission’s report in 2022, could be a contributing factor. Increased exposure to technology, personal autonomy, and experience in interacting with new technology and AI may explain this positive relationship in the Finnish context.”

In the second study, the researchers analyzed data collected from Finnish respondents over two waves, approximately one year apart (2021-2022), to see how their attitudes towards AI changed over time. They found that when people’s needs for autonomy and relatedness were fulfilled, their positive attitudes towards AI increased and their negative attitudes decreased.

The researchers concluded that when people’s basic psychological needs are met through technology use, they tend to have more positive attitudes towards AI. Understanding these factors can help in implementing AI technologies more efficiently and making them more acceptable to people.

“The findings of this study highlight the significance of self-determination in shaping both negative and positive attitudes towards AI,” Bergdahl said. “The fulfilment of basic psychological needs such as autonomy, competence, and relatedness can influence the acceptance of AI, thus influencing the adoption and rapid development of new AI applications. ”

“The study conducted comprehensive tests of AI acceptance in various settings, making it a robust cross-national and longitudinal investigation into the connection between basic social psychological needs and attitudes towards AI. The implications of these results are twofold, offering both theoretical and practical insights. They serve as a solid foundation for future research on this topic, helping to deepen our understanding of the complex dynamics between human psychology and AI acceptance.”

The study, “Self-Determination and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence: Cross-National and Longitudinal Perspectives“, was authored by Jenna Bergdahl, Rita Latikka, Magdalena Celuch, Iina Savolainen, Eerik Soares Mantere, Nina Savela, and Atte Oksanen.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Women favor men with attractive faces when making social bargaining decisions
Attractiveness

Women favor men with attractive faces when making social bargaining decisions

July 16, 2025

New research shows that women are more likely to accept offers from men with attractive faces and positive social interest in economic games, highlighting how appearance and perceived friendliness can influence fairness judgments in social decision-making.

Read moreDetails
Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors
Artificial Intelligence

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

July 15, 2025

Can an AI understand a political metaphor? Researchers pitted ChatGPT against the speeches of Donald Trump to find out. The model showed moderate success in detection but ultimately struggled with context, highlighting the current limits of automated language analysis.

Read moreDetails
Daughters who feel more attractive report stronger, more protective bonds with their fathers
Social Media

Moral outrage spreads petitions online—but doesn’t always inspire people to sign them

July 15, 2025

Posts expressing moral outrage were more likely to go viral but did not lead to more petition signatures, while posts using agentic, group identity, or prosocial language attracted more signatures despite receiving less online engagement.

Read moreDetails
Dark personality traits linked to “social zapping”: New study examines people who cancel plans at the last minute
Narcissism

Narcissistic individuals are more prone to maladaptive daydreaming

July 14, 2025

A new study suggests that narcissistic personality traits are linked to maladaptive daydreaming, with psychological defense mechanisms playing a key role in the relationship. The findings highlight how different defense styles may influence a person’s tendency to escape into fantasy.

Read moreDetails
Daughters who feel more attractive report stronger, more protective bonds with their fathers
Artificial Intelligence

People who use AI may pay a social price, according to new psychology research

July 14, 2025

Worried that using AI tools like ChatGPT at work makes you look lazy? New research suggests you might be right. A study finds employees who use AI are often judged more harshly, facing negative perceptions about their competence and effort.

Read moreDetails
New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election
Anxiety

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

July 13, 2025

Among young adults, stress from election news was linked to higher risks of depression and anxiety, while pre-election anticipatory stress was linked to depression only. Stress about the election outcome was not associated with either condition.

Read moreDetails
Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is
Psychopathy

Psychopathic personality and weak impulse control pair up to predict teen property crime

July 12, 2025

Psychopathic traits alone don’t always lead to serious offending—but when combined with weak self-regulation, they may significantly raise the risk. A new study reveals how these factors interact to shape property crime patterns in adolescents already involved in the justice system.

Read moreDetails
Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is
Political Psychology

Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is

July 12, 2025

New research finds that students with different political identities tend to engage in slightly different everyday behaviors. But students dramatically overestimate how much liberals and conservatives differ, fueling a distorted sense of social and political division.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Women favor men with attractive faces when making social bargaining decisions

Caffeine increases brain complexity during sleep, study shows

Psychedelic retreats show promise in easing depression, PTSD, and reintegration struggles among veterans

Neurons in an autism model fail to distinguish social from non-social touch

Medicinal cannabis may actually worsen sleep, a new study finds

Scientists identify the brain’s built-in brake for binge drinking

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

Childhood maltreatment linked to emotion regulation difficulties and teen mental health problems

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy